Misplaced Pages

User talk:Arcayne: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:14, 20 November 2007 editThuranX (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers20,147 edits Heroes: reply← Previous edit Revision as of 23:32, 20 November 2007 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits Re: Robin Hood edits: new sectionNext edit →
Line 89: Line 89:


:I replied before checking page history, but I'm sure you would've reverted, as you seem to be on-board with the credits now. As to former, as I said, creating a former cast list is fine by me, but check the TVWP first. ] (]) 21:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC) :I replied before checking page history, but I'm sure you would've reverted, as you seem to be on-board with the credits now. As to former, as I said, creating a former cast list is fine by me, but check the TVWP first. ] (]) 21:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

== Re: Robin Hood edits ==

Re : Ah, I see. I wasn't aware that were were content issues with the article. My revert was prompted by the childish vandalism preceding my revert, not the section in question. -- ] (]) 23:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:32, 20 November 2007

This user values third opinions and occasionally provides one.
Caveat
This user reserves the right to be more fun than you.
File:Skull logo.jpg CruftEater™ Local 665
Eating cruft since 2007






Howdy!
Click here to leave a new message.
Rude messages will be deleted at my whim.


Archive
♦My Spellbook♦
(Or, "How I Learned to Stop Hatin' & Love All the Crazy")
Arc 000
Arc 001
Arc 002
Arc 003
Arc 004

Arc 005
Arc 006
Arc 07
Archive 8
Archive 9
Archive 10
Archive 11
Archive 12
Archive 13
Archive 14
Archive 15
Archive 16
Archive 17
Archive 18
Archive 19
Archive 20
Archive 21
Archive 22
Archive 23
Archive 24
Interlude: Textboxes

What was archived

Nancy Reagan FAC

Nancy's back up at FAC here; just thought you might like to comment. And thanks so much for pitching in on discussions I give you links to. They really help me out, as you so often have. Thanks a lot. And sorry about the accusation of sockpuppetry. I just checked out that guy's page, and he seemed a little crazed :) Best of luck. --Happyme22 (talk) 05:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

No worries. It's my first abusive puppetmaster. When I was at ArbCom contributing to a complaint there, I read about some instances of far more insidious and complex puppetry. This guy was a gerbil by comparison. . I will stop by the FAC on Sunday. I still want my zen award, tho'... ;) - Arcayne () 07:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

A Sale of Two Titties

Interestingly enough, I did find an article that compares Harry to Sydney Carton, but not ol' Snivellus. faithless () 08:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Arcmeister

After I read what you were attempting, it certainly sounded just like it. Got me to laugh. You know me, keeping my cool until someone really annoying comes along, like Robinepowell. Yourself?  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, apparently, there's an Admin list with my name on it somewhere.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 22:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to butt in here, but there is no such subpage, otherwise it'd show up in a search of user pages on WP. The anon is lying unless there's a diff or link that can be shown. --健次(derumi) 00:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
B-b-b-but... there's a cabal!!! I just know they're watching us. Misplaced Pages's own Illuminati, I tell ya... —Erik (talkcontrib) - 01:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Fnord. - Arcayne () 02:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Nov. 2007

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Braveheart. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please don't remove maintenance tags, unless a fix has been made. Thanks. --Madchester 02:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Lol, um, okay, Mad. Perhaps you may have missed my message, but its considered impolite to drop generic tags in an experienced editor's talk space over a simple mistake. the cn tag got caught in a larger revert. Anyone here can tell you i am a citation-tagging monster. After all, I am fairly sure you make mistakes as well, and I would know better than to drop a generic tag on your page and call the mistake POV. Have the respect to talk to a fellow editor the way he's earned, okey-doke? - Arcayne () 03:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Harry and Ron

Thank you for this edit summary. Tvoz |talk 07:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

No worries. sometimes, i think that if Dateline NBC held a "Harry Potter: to Catch a Predator" episode, they could fill a season's worth of episodes. I actually feel sorry for Emma Watson. All that money and fame, and the pervs are never going to go away. - Arcayne () 11:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Elric

Hi Arcayne, Why did you delete my comment under the "Elric drug addict" section? I was trying to illustrate how ridiculous it was. I assume you took it another way? Ethan a dawe (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Since you haven't edited here a lot, you might not be aware that instructional sarcasm is not really an effective tool of persuasive argumentation, Ethan. Your stated intention was to use irony to illustrate your point. However, it came across as unnecessarily rude and inappropriately unfriendly to your fellow editors. I can understand how it can be difficult to hold both your temper and your tongue (believe me, I really, really do), but the effort has to be made. As it wasn't a helpful remark, and seemed more malicious than playful, I yanked it as likely trolling. Perhaps in the future, you could strive to either communicate your irony more pithily, or simply do away with it altogether. I hope that explains matters better. - Arcayne () 15:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

I swear...

...that when Misplaced Pages and the rest of the world has gone to dust, post-apocalyptic tribes will sing tales of the woeful clashes of Arcayne and Viriditas. :-P —Erik (talkcontrib) - 16:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, when you say stuff like "emotionally stunted", it really doesn't show that you've moved on. ;) When you reach a point where all dialogue with him is focused on the content and disregards the past in its entirety, that may be a strong step -- even if the other side continues targeting you personally. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 17:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Arcayne, This kind of stuff crosses the line: "maybe its something simple, like you are just infatuated and have a boy-crush on me, While I am indeed flattered, you should know that I am a guy and just not that into you, and you are far too young." Please don't say stuff like that to other editors, ok? There's no excuse for it. --MPerel 03:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Yep, that wasn't very nice; it was also something that I apologized to Viriditas for on his User Talk page,. However, it hasn't escaped my notice how you haven't offered a similar counseling for Viriditas' personal attacks. I mean, it isn't as if you don't have enough opportunities, editing alongside him in a few different articles, trading user Talk page chit-chat and awards and all. I think perhaps you aren't being very neutral here. I didn't choose to start a fight with viriditas, and indeed have even taken steps to disengage from such contact and de-escalate the situation. Your non-AGF contributions to the matter has not served that intent. - Arcayne () 12:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
It's apparent you two don't seem to like each other, and it affects not only the both of you, but surrounding editors and the editing environment in general. What can be done to heal this rift between you two? Can I help? I have some ideas, if you're open to it would you email me through my profile? --MPerel 16:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Smile

Viriditas has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Elric

No need to watchlist, I blocked the IP for 48 hours. Let me know if he keeps at it, but I will be travelling extensively in the coming week so any longer term action might need to be given to another admin. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 03:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

No 3RR report needs to be filed, however, it would be a helpful piece of information in discussing this IP address in the future if need be. You are right in that a note is usually left on the page of the blocked IP, I must admit that I am extremely lazy in leaving blovk/warning notes. If you've never seen it before, MediaWiki:Blockedtext is usualy more informative than any note I would have to write myself. Just be sure to mention this to another admin if they are considering a block, although most admins would check the block log for an IP long before the IP's talk page. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 03:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Heroes

The precedent and consensus, as well as guidelines for TV, is that credits count over all else. When/if an actor is given opening credits, they should be in the 'main cast' list. Consult someone at the TV Wikiproject for help with seasonal cast chagnes and how that should be presented, but the 'credits count' theory has worked well so far. Last season, this frustrated editors who wanted Ando in, but also helped us preclude the inclusion of actors who, while promiinent, appeared seldom, like George Takei. It's the simplest litmus test around, a clear brightline distinction, and removes any judgements by editors or shifting consensus lines. I'll leave it to you to revert yourself until a good plan for the seasonal stuff can be edited out. I'd personally accept a 'Former Cast Members' list which contains main cast members from previous seasons and/or volumes. ThuranX (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

I replied before checking page history, but I'm sure you would've reverted, as you seem to be on-board with the credits now. As to former, as I said, creating a former cast list is fine by me, but check the TVWP first. ThuranX (talk) 21:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Robin Hood edits

Re your message: Ah, I see. I wasn't aware that were were content issues with the article. My revert was prompted by the childish vandalism preceding my revert, not the section in question. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Arcayne: Difference between revisions Add topic