Revision as of 05:38, 2 December 2007 editJinxmchue (talk | contribs)1,677 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:46, 2 December 2007 edit undoFeloniousMonk (talk | contribs)18,409 edits decline, time has not run out by my count and you've ignored warningsNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{unblock reviewed|1=Previous block period had ended. This is nothing more than a biased attack against me.|decline= Block appears to be still in place, and you were warned on this page previously , which you ignored and deleted: — ] 05:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)}} | |||
{{unblock|Previous block period had ended. This is nothing more than a biased attack against me.}} |
Revision as of 05:46, 2 December 2007
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Jinxmchue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Previous block period had ended. This is nothing more than a biased attack against me.
Decline reason:
13:17, 30 November 2007 Adam Cuerden blocked "67.135.49.177 with an expiry time of 31 hours Block appears to be still in place, and you were warned on this page previously , which you ignored and deleted: — FeloniousMonk 05:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.