| Revision as of 23:45, 7 January 2008 editAnibot (talk | contribs)880 edits Delivering newsletter for the Military history WikiProject using AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:19, 12 January 2008 edit undoLantonov (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,703 edits →ТурцитеNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| :::You share with Monshuai your passion for historical truth, your Bulgarian background, and that you're not very prone to actually apologize for your misbehavior. :) ] (]) 17:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | :::You share with Monshuai your passion for historical truth, your Bulgarian background, and that you're not very prone to actually apologize for your misbehavior. :) ] (]) 17:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Турците == | |||
| Не е възможно турцита да се били повече от българите, а в цитирания източник няма данни, а просто се казва, че турците били повече. По тази логика могат да кажат, че шведите са били второто по големина малцинство. Ако мойеш намери данните от преброяването през 1880, аз не можах. --] (]) 11:16, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Ах, да и трябва да се спомене само за османските турци в историята, защото другите са тюрки и съвременните турци имат точно толкова право да се нарекат "най-преки наследници" на тюрките, колкото и всички други произлизащи от тях народи. Аз предлагам, като не може да се спори с този човек да се редуваме да премахваме редакциите му (доколкото съм тук).--] (]) 11:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Молба == | == Молба == | ||
Revision as of 15:19, 12 January 2008
| This is Lantonov's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: Index, 1 |
 |
|---|
| 15 January 2025 |
|
Welcome!
Hello, Lantonov, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Domitius 14:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Bulgarian views on the Macedonian language
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bulgarian views on the Macedonian language, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bulgarian views on the Macedonian language. Thank you.
Connection with User:Monshuai?
I found this user taking something I wrote in a debate with User:Monshuai, here User talk:Martijn faassen and using bits of it literally here Talk:Turks in Bulgaria. The text in question is: I won't go into a debate, but since you are talking to me about it, I'll try to explain what's going on. Cited sources are good. Cited sources don't make any text in Misplaced Pages immune to further editing. It depends on the quality of the text and the quality of the sources and whether what's in the sources matches the text. It depends on what other sources there are. Lantonov might just have been reading my edits and lifted this text as useful (without attribution). Since both users also seem to be interested in pushing POVs in connection to Bulgaria, there may be a deeper connection. I will definitely now be as wary of User:Lantonov as I already am of User:Monshuai. Martijn Faassen (talk) 19:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- A direct response to Martin Faassen. No, I am not Monshuai, Martin. I am what I have written on my talk page. If you continue to insist that I am Monsuai, I will initiate an investigation of IP addresses to prove that I am not, and then hold you responsible for your insinuations of dishonesty. As for the sentences that I copied, I admit that I copied some sentences from your response to Monshuai because I deemed them pertinent for the discussion with Nostradamus. I did not give credit because Misplaced Pages explicitly says that everything written here is not copywrited. If you still insist on giving you credit, this is it: the credit for the text: I won't go into a debate, but since you are talking to me about it, I'll try to explain what's going on. Cited sources are good. Cited sources don't make any text in Misplaced Pages immune to further editing. It depends on the quality of the text and the quality of the sources and whether what's in the sources matches the text. It depends on what other sources there are. goes to User:Martijn faassen. Lantonov
- My connection to Monshuai is only that I and him happen to have the same reverence for historical truth and distaste for people who try to distort it, and push their preposterous opinions here in Misplaced Pages. Lantonov (talk) 09:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- I share your passion for truth. You seem to think I insist you are Monshuai. Obviously I cannot know such a thing, which is why I didn't insist it. Note that separate or shared IP addresses both don't prove very much anyway. I just don't like my words being taken and reused just like that, and I wasn't going to let you get away with it. Next time if you like my words, the polite thing would be to ask me whether you can use them, or simply make clear you're quoting someone else. Thanks for the credit.
- You share with Monshuai your passion for historical truth, your Bulgarian background, and that you're not very prone to actually apologize for your misbehavior. :) Martijn Faassen (talk) 17:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Молба
Здравей! Би ли номинирал статиите battle of Pliska, battle of Anchialus и battle of Kleidion за избрани или поне А или GA? Нямам никаква представа как става и какви са процедурите, а съм виждал много по-лоши статии, които са FA. Поздрави, --Gligan (talk) 20:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Здравей! Не е лошо, че спориш с гърци, турци и "македонци" и дори е много полезно : ) Сега за статиите: за битката при Ключ можеш да погледнеш увода в българската версия и като като цяло статията там е добре написана. За битката при Ахелой според мен ще е добре да се направи отделен параграф за броя на войниците. Тези цифри, които ги има там можем да напишен, че са estimated. Такива приблизителни изчисления съществуват за много битки : ) Също можем да направим параграф там, озаглавен Historical sources, също като в битката при Траянови врата от българската версия. Според мен е по-добре да те оставя ти да направиш тези неща, понеже английският ти е на доста по високо ниво, но ще се опитам да помагам, както мога. Ако намериш схема на битката при Ключ, може пак да помоля Кandi да направи схема подобна на тази от Върбишкия поход.
- Освен това си мисля и друго - да направим портал Medieval Bulgaria, Bulgarian Empire или history of Bulgaria. Тъй като аз лично харесвам средновековната история, предпочитам да е някое от първите две, а за съвременната история и за древната да се направят отделни портали. Проблемът е, че нямам никаква представа как се прави такова нещо, тъй че ще се опитам да го разуча. Ако можеш да помогнеш тук, ще е много добре. Поздрави, --Gligan (talk) 19:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Human rights violation...
About the Turks in Bulgaria (durig communism) Can you find some sources about that, probably Bulgarians were archived this information? --Ilhanli (talk) 16:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I agree with the quote in principle. Will look were it was taken from. Lantonov (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
It appears for the first time here . No reference though. Lantonov (talk) 16:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm searching to give an refference that at that time there was human rights violation; Here it is, Cited in FindArticles.com from NATO,1986
Yes, it is "flagrant violation of human rights" there. Very relevant source. Lantonov (talk) 16:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks and Happy New Year
Firstly, let me wish you a very happy New Year and thank you for your help in the Milhist Tag & Assess 2007 drive.
Secondly, although the Tag & Assess 2007 drive is now officially closed, you are very welcome to continue tagging and assessing until 31 January 2008. Any articles you tag and assess during this time will be credited fully to your tagging tally for further award purposes.
Thirdly, if you can find the time, it would be great to have your feedback/comments and participation in the recently-set-up Tag & Assess workshop The idea is to see what lessons we can learn from the 2007 drive to make the 2008 one more efficient and enjoyable.
Thanks again for your help, --ROGER DAVIES 10:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
mediation
I have accepted the request for mediation at this page: Misplaced Pages:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2008-01-05_Turks_in_Bulgaria. If there are any issues with this, please let me know. docboat (talk) 01:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter — Issue XXII (December 2007)
 Issue XXII (December 2007) | ||
|
New featured articles:
New A-Class articles: | |
| ||
| ||
Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows:
Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes. We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants alike are very welcome and appreciated. | ||
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | ||
Note: This newsletter was automatically delivered. Regards from the automated, Anibot (talk) 23:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)