Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:53, 10 July 2005 edit86.129.112.59 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:00, 10 July 2005 edit undoOmbudsman (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users7,258 edits updateNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<div style="display:block;border:1px solid #aaaaaa;vertical-align: top;width:99%; background-color:#f9f9ff;margin-bottom:10px;margin-top:5px;padding-left:5px;padding-right:4px;">		<div style="display:block;border:1px solid #aaaaaa;vertical-align: top;width:99%; background-color:#f9f9ff;margin-bottom:10px;margin-top:5px;padding-left:5px;padding-right:4px;">
	<h1 style="padding:3px; background:#077cd0; color:white; text-align:center; font-weight:bold; font-size:100%; margin-bottom:5px;margin-top:0;margin-left:-5px;margin-right:-4px;">Notice board for vaccine-related topics.</h1 >		<h1 style="padding:3px; background:#077cd0; color:white; text-align:center; font-weight:bold; font-size:100%; margin-bottom:5px;margin-top:0;margin-left:-5px;margin-right:-4px;">Notice board for vaccine-related topics.</h1 >

			{{Shortcut\|]}}

	<center>'''If you are Wikipedian interested in vaccination related topics, this notice board is for you. See also ].'''</center>		<center>'''If you are Wikipedian interested in vaccination related topics, this notice board is for you. See also ].'''</center>
Line 10:		Line 12:

	==Discussions==		==Discussions==
⚫	I believe that editors need to keep a close watch on Ombudsman's activities with regard to vaccines. Examination of his edits and many of the topics he has started show a clear agenda of alleging that autism is an epidemic, that it is substantially caused by vaccines, that there is a "medical establishment" cover-up, and that those who try to edit wiki along lines of established evidence - which does not support any of his propositions - are malign, if not corruptly influenced. In pursuit of this, he has created page after page overlapping with existing subjects, generally creating alternative narratives to those worked on by others over many months. He has also added a network of links that would tend to lead readers away from the contributions of others. He has repeatedly deleted links on such pages - most often to delete links to the ] page, where he has been unable to gain influence. He has repeatedly breached the three-reversion rule in his attempts to promote a handful of anti-vaccine activists, edited comments on his own page, making it difficult for readers to follow what's going on. He plainly has no specialist knowledge of any of these topics, and in the rare cases where he references a claim, it will generally be to an anti-vaccine opinion website. I am all for free speech and multiple viewpoints, but I would hope that those with real knowledge of autism can find the time to follow this phenomenon. Misinformation on these topics has caused real distress to parents, and, in my view, exposed children to real risks. ]



		⚫	I believe that editors need to keep a close watch on Ombudsman's activities with regard to vaccines. Examination of his edits and many of the topics he has started show a clear agenda of alleging that autism is an epidemic, that it is substantially caused by vaccines, that there is a "medical establishment" cover-up, and that those who try to edit wiki along lines of established evidence - which does not support any of his propositions - are malign, if not corruptly influenced. In pursuit of this, he has created page after page overlapping with existing subjects, generally creating alternative narratives to those worked on by others over many months. He has also added a network of links that would tend to lead readers away from the contributions of others. He has repeatedly deleted links on such pages - most often to delete links to the ] page, where he has been unable to gain influence. He has repeatedly breached the three-reversion rule in his attempts to promote a handful of anti-vaccine activists, edited comments on his own page, making it difficult for readers to follow what's going on. He plainly has no specialist knowledge of any of these topics, and in the rare cases where he references a claim, it will generally be to an anti-vaccine opinion website. I am all for free speech and multiple viewpoints, but I would hope that those with real knowledge of autism can find the time to follow this phenomenon. Misinformation on these topics has caused real distress to parents, and, in my view, exposed children to real risks. ]

			:It would be nice if you placed informative explanations in your edit summaries 86.129.121.*; it would be even nicer if you also acquired a user name, rather than using a dynamic IP. It is interesting you appear bent on thinking for readers, intent on deleting salient information, content instead with adding disinformative inuendo and smearing those whose views apparently offend you. Millions of parents are already extremely distressed by the epidemic of neurological disorders afflicting their children. Their needs are not well addressed by patronizingly obstructionist editing. Exposing children to far too many vaccines - whose benefits are often dubious when taken individually (especially when consumed in massive quantities), is a grave danger you seemingly are unwilling to consider. ] 21:00, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

	<!-- For particular article-specific discussions, use the corresponding article's talk page -->		<!-- For particular article-specific discussions, use the corresponding article's talk page -->
Line 21:		Line 22:

	===Open tasks===		===Open tasks===

			* ]

	===Expansion requests===		===Expansion requests===

			* ]
		⚫	* ]

	===NPOV requests===		===NPOV requests===

			* ]
	* ]		* ]
	* ]		* ]
Line 33:		Line 40:
	===Vaccine-related articles in need of attention===		===Vaccine-related articles in need of attention===

			* ] maternal transmission of toxins section
⚫	* ]

	===New vaccine-related articles===		===New vaccine-related articles===
Line 40:		Line 47:
	* ]		* ]
	* ]		* ]
			* ]

	===Requested moves===		===Requested moves===

Revision as of 21:00, 10 July 2005

Notice board for vaccine-related topics.

Shortcut

]

If you are Wikipedian interested in vaccination related topics, this notice board is for you. See also Vaccine controversy.

You may also choose to watch the List of vaccine topics.

References

Misplaced Pages:Notice board for vaccine-related topics/References: a list of reputable websites, books and other encyclopedic resources that you can consult to help you write articles.

Discussions

I believe that editors need to keep a close watch on Ombudsman's activities with regard to vaccines. Examination of his edits and many of the topics he has started show a clear agenda of alleging that autism is an epidemic, that it is substantially caused by vaccines, that there is a "medical establishment" cover-up, and that those who try to edit wiki along lines of established evidence - which does not support any of his propositions - are malign, if not corruptly influenced. In pursuit of this, he has created page after page overlapping with existing subjects, generally creating alternative narratives to those worked on by others over many months. He has also added a network of links that would tend to lead readers away from the contributions of others. He has repeatedly deleted links on such pages - most often to delete links to the autism page, where he has been unable to gain influence. He has repeatedly breached the three-reversion rule in his attempts to promote a handful of anti-vaccine activists, edited comments on his own page, making it difficult for readers to follow what's going on. He plainly has no specialist knowledge of any of these topics, and in the rare cases where he references a claim, it will generally be to an anti-vaccine opinion website. I am all for free speech and multiple viewpoints, but I would hope that those with real knowledge of autism can find the time to follow this phenomenon. Misinformation on these topics has caused real distress to parents, and, in my view, exposed children to real risks. 86.129.121.203

It would be nice if you placed informative explanations in your edit summaries 86.129.121.*; it would be even nicer if you also acquired a user name, rather than using a dynamic IP. It is interesting you appear bent on thinking for readers, intent on deleting salient information, content instead with adding disinformative inuendo and smearing those whose views apparently offend you. Millions of parents are already extremely distressed by the epidemic of neurological disorders afflicting their children. Their needs are not well addressed by patronizingly obstructionist editing. Exposing children to far too many vaccines - whose benefits are often dubious when taken individually (especially when consumed in massive quantities), is a grave danger you seemingly are unwilling to consider. Ombudsman 21:00, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages