Revision as of 00:53, 3 February 2008 editAndyvphil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,372 edits Insight isn't neocon. Commentary is neocon. Distinction may not be clear to those who use it as an epithet, but some of us know better.← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:18, 3 February 2008 edit undoAndyvphil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,372 edits →Allegations against 2008 Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign: OK. I've looked. The Media Person blog isn't reporting, and the quoted text was intended as a joke. Insignificant cite.Next edit → | ||
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''''Insight''''' (formerly ''Insight on the News'') is an American ] Internet magazine now edited by ] and owned by ], described by the ] as |
'''''Insight''''' (formerly ''Insight on the News'') is an American ] Internet magazine now edited by ] and owned by ], described by the ] as "the media arm of Reverend Sun Myung Moon’s Unification Church".{{fact}} | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
''Insight'' was founded in the 1980s by ] as a print weekly called ''Insight on the News'', and |
''Insight'' was founded in the 1980s by ] as a print weekly called ''Insight on the News'', and was known for its reports about alleged scandals in the administration of ] ]. | ||
Originally, the magazine circulated midway in frequency between sister publications '']'' (a daily newspaper) and the monthly ] magazine. All three periodicals remain part of ], a media company owned and subsidized by the ] of ]. | Originally, the magazine circulated midway in frequency between sister publications '']'' (a daily newspaper) and the monthly ] magazine. All three periodicals remain part of ], a media company owned and subsidized by the ] of ]. | ||
In ], News World Communications closed the print magazine and hired ] to run it as a stand-alone ]. Under Kuhner, ''Insight'' |
In ], News World Communications closed the print magazine and hired ] to run it as a stand-alone ]. Under Kuhner, ''Insight'' eschews bylines, in what Kuhner describes as an effort to "encourage contributions from reporters who do not want to reveal their names". About ''Insight's'' policy, Kuhner has said:<ref>{{cite news | url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A04E2DD143FF93AA15752C0A9619C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all | title=Feeding Frenzy For a Big Story, Even if It's False | publisher=NY Times | date=January 29, 2007 | first=David D. | last=Kirkpatrick | accessdate = 2007-11-25}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/Kuhner_1.htm | title=Distortions and lies at The New York Times | publisher=''Insight'' | date=January 31, 2007 | first=Jeffrey T. | last=Kuhner | accessdate = 2007-11-25}}</ref> | ||
:“Reporters in Washington know a whole lot of what is going on and feel themselves shackled and prevented from reporting what they know is going on. ''Insight'' is almost like an outlet, an escape valve where they can come out with this information.” | :“Reporters in Washington know a whole lot of what is going on and feel themselves shackled and prevented from reporting what they know is going on. ''Insight'' is almost like an outlet, an escape valve where they can come out with this information.” | ||
⚫ | ==Print magazine era== | ||
Media scholars, professional journalists and many conservatives (typically, paleoconservatives) frequently describe these sourcing policies as intended to provide "cover" for Insight's brand of "whisper campaign" political attacks. Since it's founding, Insight has been criticized for it's role in creating, promoting or "amplifying" a wide variety of politically charged "Urban Legends"<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Google Scholar references | date= | publisher=Various published sources from Google Scholar database | url =http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=propaganda&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=myung+moon+&as_oq=neoconservative+neocon+GOP+neoconservatism+straussian&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=soc&hl=en&lr= | work = | pages = | accessdate = 2008-01-31 | language = }}</ref> and "smear campaigns", many of which became widely accepted as truth.<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Google Scholar references | date= | publisher=Various sources from Google Scholar database | url =http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=propaganda&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=myung+moon+&as_oq=neoconservative+neocon+GOP+neoconservatism+straussian&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=soc&hl=en&lr= | work = | pages = | accessdate = 2008-01-31 | language = }}</ref> | |||
⚫ | ==Print magazine |
||
===David Brock=== | ===David Brock=== | ||
] worked as a reporter for the print version of ''Insight'' during the late 1980s. Brock |
] worked as a reporter for the print version of ''Insight'' during the late 1980s. After leaving Insight Brock wrote "Blinded by the Right: Conscience of an Ex-Conservative", and now runs ], an organization that describes itself as "a web-based, not-for-profit, ] research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media."<ref name=mediamatters></ref><ref>[http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=brock&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=blinded+by+the+right&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=soc&hl=en&lr= Google Scholar publications relating to "Blinded by the Right"</ref> | ||
Upon leaving Insight, Brock published "Blinded by the Right: Conscience of an Ex-Conservative", referring to his work for Insight. <ref name=mediamatters>[http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=brock&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=blinded+by+the+right&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=soc&hl=en&lr= Google Scholar publications relating to "Blinded by the Right"</ref> | |||
===Arlington National Cemetery=== | ===Arlington National Cemetery=== | ||
In 1997 ''Insight'' reported that the administration of President Bill Clinton gave political donors rights to be buried in ]. This charge was widely repeated on talk radio and other conservative outlets; but was later denied by the ], which has charge over Arlington Cemetery. Nevertheless, the "Arlington Controversy" was born, and took on a life of it's own. | In 1997 ''Insight'' reported that the administration of President Bill Clinton gave political donors rights to be buried in ]. This charge was widely repeated on talk radio and other conservative outlets; but was later denied by the ], which has charge over Arlington Cemetery. Nevertheless, the "Arlington Controversy" was born, and took on a life of it's own. | ||
Spurred on by Insight's |
Spurred on by Insight's report, a subsequent flurry of media investigations turned up the burial of ], a former ] to ] at Arlington, which in turn sparked a congressional investigation. ] members of congress searched military records and found no evidence that Lawrence was ever in the ]. As a result Lawrence's body was ] in 1997 at taxpayer expense and brought to ]. ], an assistant secretary of state, had helped attain the rights to bury Lawrence at Arlington, and had written a letter to the White House praising Lawrence and saying that he deserved burial at the National Cemetery.<ref>http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/11/21/arlington.folo/</ref><ref></ref><ref></ref><ref>http://compuserb.com/lawrence.htm</ref> | ||
===Paula Jones=== | ===Paula Jones=== | ||
In 1998 CNN reported that ''Insight'' |
In 1998 CNN reported that ''Insight'' "created a stir" when ], who had filed a ] lawsuit against President Clinton, was its guest at the annual ] dinner, where Clinton spoke.<ref> ] April 25, 1998</ref> | ||
==Internet magazine |
==Internet magazine era== | ||
=== |
===Allegations against 2008 Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign === | ||
{{see also|Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008#False claims concerning Obama's religious background}} | {{see also|Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008#False claims concerning Obama's religious background}} | ||
In January 2007, ''Insight'' published an anonymous article asserting that opposition research by presidential candidate Senator ]'s campaign team had discovered that rival candidate Senator ] had concealed that he was educated in an ] religious school (]) during his youth in ], and that Clinton's campaign intended to use the discovery against Obama.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/Obama_2.htm | title=Hillary's team has questions about Obama's Muslim background | publisher=Insight | date=Jan. 16-22, 2007 | first= | last= | accessdate = 2007-11-26}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.insightmag.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=7FD9C68AF0F844919BF0684F279BF505&nm=Subscriptions&type=Subscribe&mod=Subscribe&tier=1&id=C04C0465913949F49AA81CA9002986F4 | title=Last word: What Insight reported and what it did not (subscription required)| publisher=Insight | date=Feb. 1, 2007 | first= | last= | accessdate = 2007-11-25}}</ref> ''Insight'''s story was mentioned on ] television broadcasts, and elsewhere.<ref>For media responses to the ''Insight'' and Fox News Channel reports, see: {{cite news | first=David D | last=Kirkpatrick | title=Feeding Frenzy for a Big Story, Even If It's False | date=] ] | url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A04E2DD143FF93AA15752C0A9619C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all | work=New York Times | accessdate=2007-09-30}} {{cite news | title=Obama, School Deny Radical Islam Claim | date=] ] | publisher=WPVI-TV Philadelphia (ABC) | url=http://video.ap.org/vws/search/aspx/ap.aspx?t=s60&p=ENAPus_ENAPus&g=0125dv_obama_school&f=1165353 | work=Associated Press | accessdate=2007-11-18 | format=video}}</ref> | In January 2007, ''Insight'' published an anonymous article asserting that opposition research by presidential candidate Senator ]'s campaign team had discovered that rival candidate Senator ] had concealed that he was educated in an ] religious school (]) during his youth in ], and that Clinton's campaign intended to use the discovery against Obama.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A04E2DD143FF93AA15752C0A9619C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all | title=Feeding Frenzy For a Big Story, Even if It's False | publisher=NY Times | date=January 29, 2007 | first=David D. | last=Kirkpatrick | accessdate = 2007-11-25}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/Obama_2.htm | title=Hillary's team has questions about Obama's Muslim background | publisher=Insight | date=Jan. 16-22, 2007 | first= | last= | accessdate = 2007-11-26}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.insightmag.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=7FD9C68AF0F844919BF0684F279BF505&nm=Subscriptions&type=Subscribe&mod=Subscribe&tier=1&id=C04C0465913949F49AA81CA9002986F4 | title=Last word: What Insight reported and what it did not (subscription required)| publisher=Insight | date=Feb. 1, 2007 | first= | last= | accessdate = 2007-11-25}}</ref> ''Insight'''s story was mentioned on ] television broadcasts, and elsewhere.<ref>For media responses to the ''Insight'' and Fox News Channel reports, see: {{cite news | first=David D | last=Kirkpatrick | title=Feeding Frenzy for a Big Story, Even If It's False | date=] ] | url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A04E2DD143FF93AA15752C0A9619C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all | work=New York Times | accessdate=2007-09-30}} {{cite news | title=Obama, School Deny Radical Islam Claim | date=] ] | publisher=WPVI-TV Philadelphia (ABC) | url=http://video.ap.org/vws/search/aspx/ap.aspx?t=s60&p=ENAPus_ENAPus&g=0125dv_obama_school&f=1165353 | work=Associated Press | accessdate=2007-11-18 | format=video}}</ref> | ||
Soon after, ] reporter ] visited the school and was told, "This is a public school. We don't focus on religion."<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/index.html | title=CNN debunks false report about Obama|publisher=] | date=January 22, 2007 | first= | last= | accessdate = 2007-01-26}}</ref> |
Soon after, ] reporter ] visited ], where each child received two hours of religious instruction per week in his or her own faith,<ref>http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-070325obama-islam-story,0,7180545.story</ref> and was told, "This is a public school. We don't focus on religion." The CNN story also quoted a spokesperson for Clinton, who dismissed the allegation as "an obvious right-wing hit job" on both candidates.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/index.html | title=CNN debunks false report about Obama|publisher=] | date=January 22, 2007 | first= | last= | accessdate = 2007-01-26}}</ref> ''Insight'' responded that, "To simply take the word of a deputy headmaster about what was the religious curriculum of a school 35 years ago does not satisfy our standards for aggressive investigative reporting", and said that "Although we are not able to send correspondents to places like Jakarta to check out every fact in a story, we harness our resources for what we do best—providing our readers with political intelligence."<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/CNNResponse2.htm | title=Hats off to CNN, but... about Obama|publisher=Insight | date= January 23-29, 2007 | first= | last= | accessdate = 2007-11-25}}</ref>. | ||
A ] story in '']'' quoted ''Insight'' editor ] as saying he considered the article is "solid as solid can be", but said of Kuhner: | A ] story in '']'' quoted ''Insight'' editor ] as saying he considered the article is "solid as solid can be", but said of Kuhner: | ||
:"Jeffrey T. Kuhner, whose Web site published the first anonymous smear of the 2008 presidential race, is hardly the only editor who will not reveal his reporters’ sources. What sets him apart is that he will not even disclose the names of his reporters." | :"Jeffrey T. Kuhner, whose Web site published the first anonymous smear of the 2008 presidential race, is hardly the only editor who will not reveal his reporters’ sources. What sets him apart is that he will not even disclose the names of his reporters." | ||
During the Times interview, Kuhner stated that he "meant to focus on the thinking of the Clinton campaign", and declined to say whether he knew the identity of his unnamed reporter’s sources. The ''Times'' commented "perhaps only that reporter knows the origin of the article’s anonymous quotes and assertions. Its assertions about Mr. Obama resemble rumors passed on without evidence in e-mail messages..."<ref name="feed">{{cite news | url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/29/us/politics/29media.html?_r=1&oref=slogin | title=Feeding Frenzy for a Big Story, Even if It’s False|publisher=New York Times | date=29 January 2007 | first= | last= | accessdate = 2007-01-29}} |
During the Times interview, Kuhner stated that he "meant to focus on the thinking of the Clinton campaign", and declined to say whether he knew the identity of his unnamed reporter’s sources. The ''Times'' commented "perhaps only that reporter knows the origin of the article’s anonymous quotes and assertions. Its assertions about Mr. Obama resemble rumors passed on without evidence in e-mail messages..."<ref name="feed">{{cite news | url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/29/us/politics/29media.html?_r=1&oref=slogin | title=Feeding Frenzy for a Big Story, Even if It’s False|publisher=New York Times | date=29 January 2007 | first= | last= | accessdate = 2007-01-29}}</ref> | ||
On ] Kuhner responded to the Times story, suggesting that it's expose of Insight was an attempt to "obscure the real issue", which he asserted was the intentions of Hillary Clinton.<ref></ref> | |||
John Moody, a senior vice president at Fox News, said Fox had erred in mentioning the Insight allegations, stating that Fox had "reported information from a publication whose accuracy we didn’t know."{{fact}} | |||
===SANE Project=== | ===SANE Project=== |
Revision as of 02:18, 3 February 2008
For other uses, see Insight.Type | weekly online magazine |
---|---|
Format | magazine |
Owner(s) | News World Communications |
Editor | Jeffrey T. Kuhner |
Founded | 1980s |
Political alignment | conservative |
Headquarters | 3600 New York Avenue NE Washington DC 20002 |
Website | insightmag.com |
Insight (formerly Insight on the News) is an American conservative Internet magazine now edited by Jeffrey T. Kuhner and owned by News World Communications, described by the Columbia Journalism Review as "the media arm of Reverend Sun Myung Moon’s Unification Church".
Background
Insight was founded in the 1980s by News World Communications as a print weekly called Insight on the News, and was known for its reports about alleged scandals in the administration of U.S. President Bill Clinton.
Originally, the magazine circulated midway in frequency between sister publications The Washington Times (a daily newspaper) and the monthly World&I magazine. All three periodicals remain part of News World Communications, a media company owned and subsidized by the Unification Church of Rev. Sun Myung Moon.
In 2004, News World Communications closed the print magazine and hired Jeffrey T. Kuhner to run it as a stand-alone website. Under Kuhner, Insight eschews bylines, in what Kuhner describes as an effort to "encourage contributions from reporters who do not want to reveal their names". About Insight's policy, Kuhner has said:
- “Reporters in Washington know a whole lot of what is going on and feel themselves shackled and prevented from reporting what they know is going on. Insight is almost like an outlet, an escape valve where they can come out with this information.”
Print magazine era
David Brock
David Brock worked as a reporter for the print version of Insight during the late 1980s. After leaving Insight Brock wrote "Blinded by the Right: Conscience of an Ex-Conservative", and now runs Media Matters for America, an organization that describes itself as "a web-based, not-for-profit, progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media."
Arlington National Cemetery
In 1997 Insight reported that the administration of President Bill Clinton gave political donors rights to be buried in Arlington National Cemetery. This charge was widely repeated on talk radio and other conservative outlets; but was later denied by the United States Army, which has charge over Arlington Cemetery. Nevertheless, the "Arlington Controversy" was born, and took on a life of it's own.
Spurred on by Insight's report, a subsequent flurry of media investigations turned up the burial of Larry Lawrence, a former United States Ambassador to Switzerland at Arlington, which in turn sparked a congressional investigation. Republican Party members of congress searched military records and found no evidence that Lawrence was ever in the Merchant Marine. As a result Lawrence's body was disinterred in 1997 at taxpayer expense and brought to California. Richard Holbrooke, an assistant secretary of state, had helped attain the rights to bury Lawrence at Arlington, and had written a letter to the White House praising Lawrence and saying that he deserved burial at the National Cemetery.
Paula Jones
In 1998 CNN reported that Insight "created a stir" when Paula Jones, who had filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against President Clinton, was its guest at the annual White House Correspondents Association dinner, where Clinton spoke.
Internet magazine era
Allegations against 2008 Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign
See also: Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008 § False claims concerning Obama's religious backgroundIn January 2007, Insight published an anonymous article asserting that opposition research by presidential candidate Senator Hillary Clinton's campaign team had discovered that rival candidate Senator Barack Obama had concealed that he was educated in an Islamic religious school (madrassa) during his youth in Indonesia, and that Clinton's campaign intended to use the discovery against Obama. Insight's story was mentioned on Fox News Channel television broadcasts, and elsewhere.
Soon after, CNN reporter John Vause visited the school, where each child received two hours of religious instruction per week in his or her own faith, and was told, "This is a public school. We don't focus on religion." The CNN story also quoted a spokesperson for Clinton, who dismissed the allegation as "an obvious right-wing hit job" on both candidates. Insight responded that, "To simply take the word of a deputy headmaster about what was the religious curriculum of a school 35 years ago does not satisfy our standards for aggressive investigative reporting", and said that "Although we are not able to send correspondents to places like Jakarta to check out every fact in a story, we harness our resources for what we do best—providing our readers with political intelligence.".
A January 29 story in The New York Times quoted Insight editor Jeffrey T. Kuhner as saying he considered the article is "solid as solid can be", but said of Kuhner:
- "Jeffrey T. Kuhner, whose Web site published the first anonymous smear of the 2008 presidential race, is hardly the only editor who will not reveal his reporters’ sources. What sets him apart is that he will not even disclose the names of his reporters."
During the Times interview, Kuhner stated that he "meant to focus on the thinking of the Clinton campaign", and declined to say whether he knew the identity of his unnamed reporter’s sources. The Times commented "perhaps only that reporter knows the origin of the article’s anonymous quotes and assertions. Its assertions about Mr. Obama resemble rumors passed on without evidence in e-mail messages..."
On January 31 Kuhner responded to the Times story, suggesting that it's expose of Insight was an attempt to "obscure the real issue", which he asserted was the intentions of Hillary Clinton.
John Moody, a senior vice president at Fox News, said Fox had erred in mentioning the Insight allegations, stating that Fox had "reported information from a publication whose accuracy we didn’t know."
SANE Project
In June of 2007, Insight reported on an undercover investigation of the Dar Al-Hijrah Islamic Center, located in Falls Church, Virginia, a suburb of Washington, D.C., by the group Society of Americans for National Existence (SANE). David Gaubatz, a spokesperson for the group, said:
- “The ultimate goal for those at Dar Al-Hijrah is to instill Sharia law in the U.S. and have America adhere to the Islamic faith. They want America to be an Islamic state.”
Insight's story was denounced by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
In February 2007 SANE had released a policy paper stating that the objective of SANE is to banish Islam from the US by making "adherence to Islam" ("defined as any act, including any written or oral declaration, in support of Shari’a or in furtherance of the imposition of Shari’a within any territory of the United States of America.") punishable by 20 years in prison.
References
- Kirkpatrick, David D. (January 29, 2007). "Feeding Frenzy For a Big Story, Even if It's False". NY Times. Retrieved 2007-11-25.
- Kuhner, Jeffrey T. (January 31, 2007). "Distortions and lies at The New York Times". Insight. Retrieved 2007-11-25.
{{cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
(help) - About Media Matters
- [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=brock&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=blinded+by+the+right&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=soc&hl=en&lr= Google Scholar publications relating to "Blinded by the Right"
- http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/11/21/arlington.folo/
- CNN, Arlington Controversy Stirs Again, Dec. 4, 1997
- CNN, Arlington Controversy Continues, Dec. 11, 1997
- http://compuserb.com/lawrence.htm
- Paula Jones Rubs Shoulders With Washington Elite At Dinner CNN April 25, 1998
- Kirkpatrick, David D. (January 29, 2007). "Feeding Frenzy For a Big Story, Even if It's False". NY Times. Retrieved 2007-11-25.
- "Hillary's team has questions about Obama's Muslim background". Insight. Jan. 16-22, 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-26.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - "Last word: What Insight reported and what it did not (subscription required)". Insight. Feb. 1, 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-25.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - For media responses to the Insight and Fox News Channel reports, see: Kirkpatrick, David D (January 29 2007). "Feeding Frenzy for a Big Story, Even If It's False". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-09-30.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) "Obama, School Deny Radical Islam Claim" (video). Associated Press. WPVI-TV Philadelphia (ABC). January 25 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-18.{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-070325obama-islam-story,0,7180545.story
- "CNN debunks false report about Obama". CNN. January 22, 2007. Retrieved 2007-01-26.
- "Hats off to CNN, but... about Obama". Insight. January 23–29, 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-25.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: date format (link) - "Feeding Frenzy for a Big Story, Even if It's False". New York Times. 29 January 2007. Retrieved 2007-01-29.
- Kuhner: Distortions and lies at The New York Times
- "Insight Magazine Mapping Sharia Project Uncovers Jihadists near DC".
- "Washington Times Promotes Hate Group That Would Outlaw Islam".
- CAIR Attacks SANE and the Washington Times for Mapping Sharia Article