Revision as of 19:41, 31 July 2005 editTznkai (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,985 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:02, 31 July 2005 edit undoTznkai (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,985 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Legitimate difference is not vandalism.--] 19:41, 31 July 2005 (UTC) | Legitimate difference is not vandalism.--] 19:41, 31 July 2005 (UTC) | ||
<BR><br> | |||
Yeah right... my thesis was illegitimate, but his isn't. lol <br> | |||
I really want to see this. ;)<br> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
Read the applicable policies and guidelines please. We're here to be civil and work together.--] 19:46, 31 July 2005 (UTC)<br><br> | |||
I'm not going to read all these. | |||
As far as I know they had reported me for vandalism because I was changed an article too many times.<BR> | |||
So I'll do the same if they continue change it. <br> | |||
] | |||
I'm willing to cut you slack based on apparent age, newness, etc, but accusations of vandalism, failure to strive for ] engaging in ] is wearing that thin. You ''have'' violated our ]. I am giving you a fair warning. If you are unwilling to modify your behavior or atleast read our policies and guidelines, you may find yourself under ]--] 19:57, 31 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
<br><Br> | |||
"Manos, I am not about to waste time on the same topics over & over. If you want criticisms, why don't you read the articles themselves for now. Or go to a library or a bookstore, if you can bring yourself to open a book. Decius 19:57, 31 July 2005 (UTC)" <br> | |||
Is this a personal attack or what?<br> | |||
] | |||
:Highly irrelevant. There is no excuse for personal attacks, including retaliation.--] 20:02, 31 July 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:02, 31 July 2005
Plz leave a message and I might reply.
All old posts are in the Trash Bin.
MANOS
Legitimate difference is not vandalism.--Tznkai 19:41, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
Yeah right... my thesis was illegitimate, but his isn't. lol
I really want to see this. ;)
MANOS
WP:Vandalism
WP:Civility
Read the applicable policies and guidelines please. We're here to be civil and work together.--Tznkai 19:46, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
I'm not going to read all these.
As far as I know they had reported me for vandalism because I was changed an article too many times.
So I'll do the same if they continue change it.
MANOS
I'm willing to cut you slack based on apparent age, newness, etc, but accusations of vandalism, failure to strive for WP:NPOV engaging in personal attacks is wearing that thin. You have violated our Three Revert Rule. I am giving you a fair warning. If you are unwilling to modify your behavior or atleast read our policies and guidelines, you may find yourself under a request for comment--Tznkai 19:57, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
"Manos, I am not about to waste time on the same topics over & over. If you want criticisms, why don't you read the articles themselves for now. Or go to a library or a bookstore, if you can bring yourself to open a book. Decius 19:57, 31 July 2005 (UTC)"
Is this a personal attack or what?
MANOS
- Highly irrelevant. There is no excuse for personal attacks, including retaliation.--Tznkai 20:02, 31 July 2005 (UTC)