Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:48, 7 April 2008

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sefringle 02:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

This user was never attacked by me. He was asked about his recent vandalism of an article and self righteously, and quite smugly uses the royal "We" to lend credence to his asinine assertion that he was personally attacked. In reviewing his edits, I see that this user has a definite point of view that he wants to push, and any future comments by this user will be archived immediately.Die4Dixie 19:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Balmerino pictures

Hi, you asked for pictures of the River Tay from Balmerino. I live in Balmerino, so it shouldn't be a problem, however I am not quite sure where "Brownie's Bray" is. Is it in the Kirkton of Balmerino? If not, perhaps pointing it out in a satellite view (such as that from http://local.live.com/) would be useful!Cb43569 (talk) 14:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the directions. I'll try to take them as soon as possible, if weather allows!Cb43569 (talk) 12:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:Linda Gottfredson

I see that you were the last edit on this page. I would like to remove the disputed neutrality box. If you have no objections that you would care to discuss, that is.Die4Dixie 16:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Er im not sure what you are asking, the edit i made was purely to revert some vandalism. If you want to remove the neutrality tag just add a section on the pages talk page and see if other uses agree that it is now neutral. Or Be bold and remove the tag anyway =] --Childzy ¤ Talk 17:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Martin Luther King, Jr.

Please see Martin Luther King, Jr.#Plagiarism and Martin Luther King, Jr. authorship issues. Your addition of the phrase "after having plagiarized his dissertation" in the section concerning King's education suggests that you didn't read the article before you edited it or that you have a partisan agenda. Your claim on my Talk page that you have sources indicates that you still haven't read either article. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 20:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

I responded to this user on his talk page, where I originally posted.Please follow his link above to that page for my response, and for an up to date look at the discussion, please see the talk page for MLK.Die4Dixie 05:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

MLK

Seems to me that a parenthetical remark about plagiarism isn't out of line. I haven't been paying attention to the squabble, though, so I don't know what has sparked the disagreement. Phiwum 01:33, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

"Decanonized" saints

I've always had a problem with that category's name, because as you say, there's no such thing as "decanonization", though there is some attempt to explain this at the category page. Additionally different churches have different lists of saints. "Saints no longer in the universal calendar" will be able to include such things as Ursula and Christopher, on top of what we have there (mostly people related to the blood libels, ahistorical figures that were never on the calendar, and the dog saint). I'm for a change (pretty much any change). You may wish to bring this up at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Saints; I'm sure they'll agree, and we can take it up at categories for discussion.--Cúchullain /c 20:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Username Concern

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Misplaced Pages's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

• If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
• If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Misplaced Pages administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
• You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Misplaced Pages:Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Thank you. Jmlk17 06:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Your user name, in conjunction with the subjects you have edited, can be percieved as disruptive. Please consider changing your username to something like "DixiePride" or "Southern and Proud." Ursasapien (talk) 07:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

My user name comes from the refrain for "Dixie". My grandfather's grandfather was wounded at the Battle of Kennesaw Mountian defending Atlanta from Sherman's advance. I have chosen this name to honor his sacrifice, and for all those who sacrificed when they were called to serve. As to if the cause was just, who knows? but he served with honor, and was honorably discharged, and pensioned. As far as you inferring that my edits were not in good faith is in violation of the policy of assume good faith, and the implication that they might not be, based on my user name is a personal attack.I do not owe you (Ursasapien) an explanation of my choice of user name, but I do believe in being civil. If this doesn't meet your requirements, then I invite you both to request mediation. If you can point out something specific in my edits to articles or their talk pages, then i also invite you to bring this up on those talk pages.Die4Dixie 08:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

This contribution appears to be you arguing that Stormfront is not a hate site. Your campaign to edit Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.‎'s article, inserting derogatory information, would make some wonder about your intentions. Then you use the words, "fresh oot o' tha bogs" mick," on the talk page of Sean Hannity's article. I certainly assume that you are editing in good faith, but your username seems to imply that you are willing to "die" for the "cause" of Dixie. I understand Southern pride and honoring your forefather's sacrifice. I just think this username is needlessly polemic. Imagine if someone's username was "Würfel für das motherland," a phrase from a song of WWII origin. Despite the best of intentions, this editor may have difficulty editing articles about the Holocaust. Please consider what I am saying and be assured that it comes from a place of good faith and good intentions. Ursasapien (talk) 08:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

That is certainly cherry picking. Especially since the consensus on the Stormfront article is with me on that issue.Referenced third party sources that claim the organization is racist continue to appear in the article, which I'm not opposed to. My edit there has been taken out of context and mischaracterized.Die4Dixie 10:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

My concern on Hannity's page was that I thought that there was the continuous repetition of Irish ,Irish , and Irish. I would not characterize him as such( fresh oot o' tha bogs) or as a "mick", but it seemed to me that that was what the constant repetition of that was trying to say. i am of Irish descent, but my nationality is not Irish American. Unless I had an Irish passport, that is. As far as Stormfront, I think they are a bunch of azz clowns. I think they are misguided, and that there are haters on that site. But there are haters on Misplaced Pages, and I would be reluctant to describe this as a hate encyclopedia.I think it is POV to label the site as a hate site. The information i wanted to insert on MLK was only in reference to his plagiarism. If you have read my comments, then you will understand why.If you took the extra class option instead of the thesis option for you masters, then i could understand why plagiarism would not be worthy of mention at the same time as the degree.Die4Dixie 09:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Regardless, if I (who has many of the same preferences and political beliefs) read your username, look at your edits, and have questions, how will someone that is looking for racism under every stone percieve you as an editor? I would truly encourage you to consider changing your username. Don't start trouble for yourself. On another note, you may want to help me at Michael Savage (commentator) which recently recieved Good Article status. Ursasapien (talk) 09:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

We are playing tag. Kiss and make up. My comment on the "bogs" was to say that I thought someone was constantly repeating Irish to characterize him. It was not so long ago that people considered the Irish to be drunks, ignorant, and worthless. I felt that the constant adding of Irish was intended to imply that on the page. That is why I wanted at least two of the gratuitous mentions out.The nationality question was one of fact. That's all. I'll keep my user name, however.I use it on all the poker sites I play, on one of my email accounts, and in several places in my personal business.You take care, think about the small edit that I wanted to make on that page, and see if you could be gracious enough to allow me that.I'd agree to take out the whole nationality box rather than have one thing on Misplaced Pages be factually inaccurate.Die4Dixie 09:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

I have left you a comment on my talk page. I do not wish to "kiss and make up." I wish to avoid you and the articles you edit. I have too many other interests and do not wish to get caught up in endless arguments with someone who thinks so rigidly. Please enjoy editing WP and understand that we are here to biuld an encyclopedia, not battle to make a point. Ursasapien (talk) 05:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Black Cross of Declan

Oy! Thanks for the note. I was thoroughly unaware that symbol had been adopted by white power groups. I'm not removing it for now because a). the symbol has other associations and b). anyone who interacts with me will know I'm not a racist (also, I don't care about restrictions on the symbol in Europe, their laws don't apply to Floridians.) If it in the future it becomes such a problem that it takes time away from editing the encyclopedia, I'll remove it then.

All that said, you might want to reconsider your username if it' causing you problems in editing the encyclopedia. I don't think that user's case is very strong per the username policy, other than it can be seen as a violent reference. Additionally, the lyrics to Dixie are actually "live and die in Dixie", not "for Dixie". Just a thought.--Cúchullain /c 21:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

The battle version's chorus is a little differentDie4Dixie 22:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

No worries, it appears your name has been removed from Misplaced Pages:Usernames for administrator attention. I can help you archive your talk page if you want, but that would not remove the category entirely. If that's your issue, you ought to ask Jmlk17 about it, since he's the one who added it. He's a good user and should be able to help, especially now that the claim against your name was rejected.--Cúchullain /c 22:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Can you help me get rid of that annoying little box at the bottom of my user page that links to that list? And the list to which it links. It seems a terrible list to just appear on.Die4Dixie 22:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Martin Luther King, Jr. redux

I owe you an apology. I'm sorry that I didn't assume good faith regarding your initial edits to Martin Luther King, Jr.

I'm not going to add my voice to those calling for you to change your Username, because I think editors should call themselves whatever they'd like, within the limits of obscenity and threats. But you may want to consider the first impression other editors may get when they see your Username. (And I speak from experience.)

When I review changes to an article, I usually look at an editor's past contributions. When I saw that an editor named "Die4Dixie" added material about King's plagiarism to an article that already mentioned it, and I saw the edit that you had reverted at Stormfront (website), I jumped to the same conclusion that Orangemike described at Talk:Martin Luther King, Jr. — that your intentions were malicious.

I was wrong, and I apologize for that.

By the way, we probably agree about more things than you know. Except that "dying for Dixie" business. That doesn't sit so well with a Black Jew from New York. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 04:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

You need to read my posts a bit closer, Malik: I never made that assumption about Die4, and I don't think my posts convey otherwise. While my family lost two sons fighting the Secessionists, in the 7th Tennessee Cavalry, I understand that a person can easily get tired of the way in which mainstream U.S. culture considers it acceptable to mock Southerners in a way that no other U.S. minority can be mocked. --Orange Mike 04:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

There may be a misunderstanding here, and I want to clear it up. I jumped to the conclusion that Orange Mike described at Talk:Martin Luther King, Jr. — that somebody who was interested in writing more about King's plagiarism probably was trying to knock King — but I didn't mean to suggest that Orange Mike felt that way about Die4Dixie. I'm sorry if I wasn't clear, because Orange Mike specifically wrote that he wasn't including in his generalization those of us who were discussing the issue, including Die4Dixie. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 04:47, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

The Algerian NLF/FLN:

Was the NLF in algeria ever a marxist group/ the article is unclear.ThanksDie4Dixie 23:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

No, it was not, even if it had a few Marxist members. It did describe itself as Socialist, but never Marxist, and among its first actions after independence was to ban the Moscow-backed Algerian Communist Party. (If you have any further questions, please continue on my talk page, but please be aware that I check it very irregularly...) Arre 07:57, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Category removed

I saw your request to remove this page from the username category it was automatically placed in, so I did it for you. Happy editing. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 17:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Your Username

It's not clear to me that you're aware of this and I think in all fairness that you should be. There is still a discussion regarding your username going on here. Cheers, Into The Fray /C 20:43, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

I am going to respond to your most recent post to WP:RFCN here, because I don't want to further disrupt the process there. Please understand that, though you may not agree on Ursasapien, the rest of the editors who have commented there are doing so in good faith. The process is in good faith, whether you believe the original report to WP:UAA was or not. I personally find nothing wrong with your name, but I can see where it might damage your credibility at times, which was why I recommended you change it. If you do not, that's fine, not the end of anyone's world and I hope the discussion doesn't make you feel unwelcome. That's not the point. Also, because you seem to be under the impression that it is, WP:RFCN is not for administrators only to comment. I am not an administrator, neither is ArielGold. Jmlk17 happens to be one, Hmwith is...the rest? I don't know. Doesn't matter. Just a discussion board. Sometimes, those discussions result in blocks. "Homophobically Speaking", for instance, did. Yours doesn't appear to be going that way. Consensus seems to be to recommend a change and, if you don't want to, to let you go on your way. If you feel you are being harassed by Ursasapien (and I haven't looked at edits, so I don't have an opinion either way), then my recommendation would be that you visit Misplaced Pages:Dispute Resolution or if you feel that it is ongoing and harsh enough to warrant it, consider making a report to the Administrator's noticeboard for incidents. I strongly recommend against both, but they are available avenues to you. Always best if you can work out your differences together. Hopefully this clarifies things for you. Feel free to contact me on my talk page any time if you have questions. Cheers, Into The Fray /C 04:09, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Please allow me to state for the record that I have no doubt of the good faith of every editor on that page except the one that I have so vociferously excluded. I have assumed the good faith on that since the first second that I was made aware of the discussion there, with the one exception. We are not required to continue to assume good faith in the presence of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.. Anyone interested in understanding my objection to changing my user name based on the original complaint by Ursasapiens can follow this here. As I find typing laborious with two fingers, I will not repeat my objections here.Die4Dixie 05:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. All that aside, I'll echo what A.D. has said below and want to assure you that I wasn't trying to bite you. Welcome to Misplaced Pages and if there's anything I can do for you, just let me know. Cheers, Into The Fray /C 11:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

I never felt bitten by you. I appreciated the sense of fair play that you showed when I missed the link to the discussion page. I hope I haven't caused you to regret having brought it to my attention.Die4Dixie 11:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Not in the slightest; It's been a thought-provoking discussion since you arrived there. I just didn't want to see it disintegrate from the point. It's drawn attention, which is great, because the more voices, the broader and better the consensus. So, no, I don't regret it at all. Take good care, Into The Fray /C 12:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Username discussion

No problem. I only wrote what I felt. I honestly don't have a problem with your Username, it's just not a sentiment I share. :-) I hope you stick around, because you shouldn't let a bunch of closed-minded editors drive you away. If you do choose to take a break, I hope you come back. All the best. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 03:55, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

No worries

No worries. You seem to be a good faith contributor who is doing good things, and I don't lkike to see someone like you penalised for only a possibly borderline user name. -- Anonymous Dissident 09:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Please see my reply at WP:RFCN. I have decided that the name is fine. -- Anonymous Dissident 11:34, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

I did, and I thank you for it. I saw it shorty after you made it. I am not going to comment there for a while to allow others to reflect on what you've said, and hopefully come out directly for or against changing my username. This is not intended to at all be patronizing, but I am extremely impressed with your wisdom and maturity. I had taken the liberty of moving through some of the things you are working on. Take care and thanks for the kind wordsDie4Dixie 11:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

No, not patronizing in the slightest, but taken as a compliment, and I thank you. I hope the community shares my re-evaluated view on your username, which I think is just a harmless and unoffensive expression of your view of the War. -- Anonymous Dissident 11:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Username debate

Hi... you asked a question of me during the user name debate... but before I had a chance to respond the debate was closed. The problem reason why people view Dixie (song) as racist is well outlined in the article on the song. In essence, the song is from the point of view of a former slave who is saying he misses his slavery. I'm sure that it's not how you meant it, but I think there is a fair chance that some people will take it that way. Have a nice day, ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 00:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi J. Smith. I saw your link to that troubling article. I had added a disputed neutrality tag to that article earlier today, and am discussing some of my concerns on that talk page now. The section in which it claims the song to be racist currently has no reliable third party cites, and appears to be the original research of an editor. I address my concerns about that on that articles talk page. I am also nominating the article for review of its good article status because the first part of it where most of the assertions are, is unsourced. The dancing is mentioned twice, which I see as gratuitous, since it appears to be trying to give undue weight. That the dialect used was exaggerated is unsourced too. Mark Twain( Samuel L. Clemens) was quite careful and faithful in his reproduction of the AAVE geolects of his time, and they don't appear to be much different to my untrained eyes. Suffice to say, I welcome another eye as we try and edit that article. Do I think black face to be a problematic issue in the history of the US? Unquestionably. I would be more inclined to say the attitude was more racialist. There are those who do not see a distinction; however, I find it curious when we impose our enlightened 21st century standards to an era had a different world view. I think that today Dixie is an accepted euphemism for the South, and does not attach, when used in that context the things that you are trying to impute to it. Might be because I'm from South Georgia, and live right down the road from Dixie, Georgia and a very short drive from Dixie County, Florida. Both Blacks and Whites here drink out of Dixie cups at family reunions. There have been no mass exoduses from either of these Dixies, nor calls for boycotts of plastic cups. I appreciate, in honesty that your concerns came from a good faith effort to help improve the community. I may yet change the name; however, if there are lingering concerns about my good faith, you are much better with me with this name. I rather imagine I have 20 sets of Wiki eyes following my edits. An anonymous editor would have the potential to be far more disruptive.Die4Dixie 01:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Mentoring

I don't think I'm active enough these days to do any extensive mentoring, but I think it is a good idea in general. A few suggestions:

1. Someone once said that the bulk of what is required from Misplaced Pages contributors can be summed up in one statement: "Don't be a dick."
2. Half of that is "Assume good faith", at least in the absence of strong evidence to the contrary.
3. If you want to change what a page says not just for the next few hours but on a long term basis, citations are essential. Uncited information is always liable to be removed, especially if it is controversial.
4. Conversely, if (as in Dixie (song)) you think material already in the article is poorly cited (rare in a featured article, and I haven't really looked closely at the details myself), it helps to be very concrete about what statement you think is ill-cited and request that the specific citation for that material be provided.

Hope that helps. Feel free to ask me any reasonably specific questions, but I'm not "living in Misplaced Pages" these days, so (as I said above) I won't have time to be a full-fledged mentor. - Jmabel | Talk 16:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

WP:RPP

For future reference, whenever you request page protection, put the request at the top of the list so that the bot will not accidentally move it down with the completed ones above it. I have moved it there for you this time. Regards, Jéské 21:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism and West Monmouth School

Hi. Vandal fighting is, of course, much appreciated, but please be careful when using the 'undo' reature to revert. Sometimes people vandalise pages over a series of edits and undo will only revert one edit at a time. See example: vandalism, vandalism, undo. Do check the history to make sure you've reverted everything. – Steel 21:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

thanks.. I'll work on it.:)Die4Dixie 22:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 09:40, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

email

I did respond to the email you sent me, did you not receive it? Please feel free to email me your specific questions and I'll do my best to help. By the way you can sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) this is a good idea because it time stamps your post and links to your user page. It's considered good wikiquette to do this. All the best. Alun (talk) 06:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Slavery in the United States

Hi. I'm glad to see that you stuck around, despite the welcoming committee. I think you made the right call on Slavery in the United States. That article made assertions about Jefferson and Hemings that went beyond what the Sally Hemings article says. Thanks. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 00:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

The link in your message didn't work, but I suspect you're referring to Born in Slavery: Slave Narratives from the Federal Writers' Project, 1936-1938. It's certainly an invaluable resource, but it's also come under some criticism for a number of reasons. It had been 70 years since Emancipation, and many of those interviewed had been children when they were slaves. Their remembrances may not have been entirely accurate, especially under the circumstances of the Great Depression (which may have made the "bad old days" seem not quite as bad as the "bad new days"). Also, I think many or most of the interviews were conducted by white questioners, which may have led the former slaves to discuss some things and hold back about other things. Still, except for the few books written in the 19th century, the WPA interviews are the best we have.

In any event, it's not my article but you might want to consider adding a section toward the bottom of the article about the slave narratives (there's also a collection of recorded interviews I stumbled across). You might want to mention earlier slave narratives (some of which were important in the abolitionist movement) as well as the 20th century narratives. Just a thought. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 01:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Dunning

what do you want me to do? how can i help? WillC (talk) 23:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

why me? WillC (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Because you edited one of the talk pages I'm talking about. I'll find one and give you the link. I,m not asking for you to interject, although it is welcomed, but more a third party opinion.Die4Dixie 00:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

How to Strike

Like this As far as the rest of your comments, it's fine with me to go back to square one and see if things work out more cooperatively. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 02:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Recent edits to Jeremiah Wright

Hello, Die4Dixie. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. TheslB (talk) 05:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

thank you. Please see my response there. I want it linked one time when it is mentioned in the quote--Die4Dixie 05:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Some folks have been trying to revert all of the edits which you've made on Jeremiah Wright's article-- particular Grsz, who is quite the spin doctor. Just though you'd like to know.-Schlier22 (talk) 17:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. --Tkhorse (talk) 12:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Signatures

Hm...Have you changed your signature on your Special:Preferences page? That could be the problem. --jpgordon 18:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Let's see if thats it.Die4Dixie (talk) 18:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

YEAH! you're the greatestDie4Dixie (talk) 18:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Out of Courtesy

A thread has been opened at AN/I, the thread can be found here. Rgoodermote  23:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Was just about to leave the notice, thanks for leaving it Rgoodermote.¤~Persian Poet Gal 23:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Ditto Balloonman (talk) 23:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

TUCC

Let me know your opinion of the edit I made about the paragraph we were talking about. Grsz11 18:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Perfect. Clears up my concerns . the tag has been removed. Sorry for biting--Die4Dixie (talk) 18:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop wasting space at WP:ANI. The section isn't about what you accuse others of doing. If you feel like you need to, start a new section about me, but stop bringing up irrelevant issues under Carlos' section. Grsz11 19:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

You and another ding-a-ling have certainly wasted enough space on me there.The edit warring was not my accusation, but the informed opinion of a true administrator. After reading your wannabe admin. warnings, I think that the distinction might impress you.--Die4Dixie (talk) 19:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I have a real problem with your continued irrelevant posts. If you have a problem with me, start your own section there about it. What you're doing borders on personal attack, as you came to that page with the sole purpose of criticizing me, which is irrelevant to Carlos' behavior. Please stop stalking me, especially if all you're going to do is harass. Grsz11 20:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

you are welcome to start yet another complaint in the same place. I see your crystal ball is working and you have correctly deduced my fell intentions<end sarcasm>--Die4Dixie (talk) 20:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Hey, can you stop attacking] me? Ya, thanks. Grsz11 02:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I saw your userpage. your userbox says you are agnostic. How is this an attack?--Die4Dixie (talk) 02:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Because you know damn well how you meant to say it. Also, these: , , . That's a pretty decent collection. Grsz11 02:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

you have ceaselessly reverted my edits because they did not mtch the POV that you want pushed. I admit that I have over reacted some, but between you, Thes and C.K Jones and the way ya'll act like you own the project, I've been where I can't see straight. you have reverted several of my good faith edits with out reading them, or completely reading them. You have called sourced material vandalism without even reading the cited material. I promise you that it gives me no pleasure to edit with your group. You can both give yourselves reach around barnstars from here until the convention comes.Your click started editwarring so noone could get an edit in until you got the whole article locked for three days and warned.I have never been involved with an article that couldn't be discussed without being locked. Congradulations, you made it happen.If you don't like how people react to your behavior, maybe you might try modifying it some.I see that you haven't tried to blanket my page with your officiously worded warnings the way you have used them to harass other editors.I'm not sure why not, perhaps you could tell me? When its all said and done, this is something that you have percipitated.I have some papers to write, so I'm not thinking that I can be involved in a project that through editors like yourself, has brought out the very worst in me. Good luck, enjoy your editing, obfuscate the truth, find God and a meaningful purpose for yourself, or whatever makes you happy.--Die4Dixie (talk) 02:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Please, the whole "I'm a victim" deal is getting incredibly, incredibly old. Can you even provide a place where I reverted one of your edits for no reason? Grsz11 02:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

After taking a quick look at about 500 of your last edits, I haven't reverted one of your edits once. Grsz11 02:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, On my talkpage, you can go fuck yourself. The real crying has been by youwith your "please Mr. Dixie, don't be mean to me" routine.You are a douchebag. So why don't you put the nozzle back in your buddy's ass?--Die4Dixie (talk) 02:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)