| Revision as of 06:05, 7 May 2008 editJPG-GR (talk | contribs)Administrators55,120 edits →Removal of templates: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:17, 7 May 2008 edit undoSchwalker (talk | contribs)958 edits →Removal of templatesNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| ::Pleases read the request again, it is linking to a section named "lower case 't'" on the talk-page. You can't expect me to file the same request again while other you remove it. You're interventions are quite time consuming for me. There is no consensus since one user don't want or is not able to understand or accept the reasonable arguments for a move back to the old title. Greeting, --] (]) 06:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | ::Pleases read the request again, it is linking to a section named "lower case 't'" on the talk-page. You can't expect me to file the same request again while other you remove it. You're interventions are quite time consuming for me. There is no consensus since one user don't want or is not able to understand or accept the reasonable arguments for a move back to the old title. Greeting, --] (]) 06:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::If there's no consensus, then there's no move and the process is complete. Hence why I recommend you complete a proper request to see if there consensus for your side. ] (]) 06:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | :::If there's no consensus, then there's no move and the process is complete. Hence why I recommend you complete a proper request to see if there consensus for your side. ] (]) 06:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::My request is proper, and it has been filed for two times. I won't file it a third time. If there is no consensus, then it must be achieved. That is why I have requested the move. You can't expect me to do the same thing again and again. --] (]) 06:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:17, 7 May 2008
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:JPG-GR. |
| This is the User talk page for JPG-GR, where you can send messages and comments to JPG-GR. |
 Archives |
|
2006 Archives |
commons:User:JPG-GR
I assert to be the same user as commons:User:JPG-GR JPG-GR 07:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
meta:User:JPG-GR
I assert to be the same user as meta:User:JPG-GR JPG-GR 00:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
RM page
I don't think you should edit the formatting of my move request, as long as it is clear. There is another combined move request in the previous day, May 3, and it is formatted approximately the way I wanted to, with the page names at the top. I think the other way looks ludicrous and seems as if it is improperly done.
To fix it, I have moved the disambiguation page myself and changed it to make only one explicit request. Please don't remove the template from Talk:Speech (disambiguation), though, it's needed to alert readers. I know you rejected my move of Sex primarily for the reason that readers may not have seen it as it was on only one page, Talk:Sex (disambiguation). The way, the truth, and the light (talk) 00:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Are you ignoring me here? The way, the truth, and the light (talk) 06:03, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, since you hadn't asked any question... if you prefer to believe that, go right ahead. JPG-GR (talk) 06:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Mover?
Are you the only one doing the moves currently?--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 05:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sometimes I wonder the same thing haha. JPG-GR (talk) 05:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- In reality, there are fewer and fewer WP:RM regulars. User:Anthony Appleyard is usually still around taking care of the uncontroversials (the one section I usually avoid). JPG-GR (talk) 05:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
contested move
I do not understand one of your edits:
Am I understanding correctly it is not possible to contest a move? Thanks in advance for your reply. V8rik (talk) 17:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- The article has already been moved to Triplet state so I removed the request to move it there. JPG-GR (talk) 17:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Removal of templates
Hallo, at 05:41, 6 May 2008 you've removed two templates which I had inserted on the page to request a move of the article. Since this templates have been removed several times before by other users, I ask you to stop this removal. The argument given on the Talk:On the Jewish Question page are in my opinion convincing enough to move the article back to the title which it has had for almost three years now. Greeting, --Schwalker (talk) 06:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- There is no centralized area for discussion nor is there any consensus (that I can find on that cluttered talk page). If you are still interested in this move, please file a proper request at WP:RM. JPG-GR (talk) 05:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Pleases read the request again, it is linking to a section named "lower case 't'" on the talk-page. You can't expect me to file the same request again while other you remove it. You're interventions are quite time consuming for me. There is no consensus since one user don't want or is not able to understand or accept the reasonable arguments for a move back to the old title. Greeting, --Schwalker (talk) 06:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- If there's no consensus, then there's no move and the process is complete. Hence why I recommend you complete a proper request to see if there consensus for your side. JPG-GR (talk) 06:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- My request is proper, and it has been filed for two times. I won't file it a third time. If there is no consensus, then it must be achieved. That is why I have requested the move. You can't expect me to do the same thing again and again. --Schwalker (talk) 06:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Pleases read the request again, it is linking to a section named "lower case 't'" on the talk-page. You can't expect me to file the same request again while other you remove it. You're interventions are quite time consuming for me. There is no consensus since one user don't want or is not able to understand or accept the reasonable arguments for a move back to the old title. Greeting, --Schwalker (talk) 06:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)