| Revision as of 07:07, 15 May 2008 editFilll (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,790 edits →the undertow: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:52, 15 May 2008 edit undoIndubitably (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,667 edits →the undertow: expandNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| Tsk tsk. What a post. From one of our ] patrol and champions of political correctness, and warriors against un] discourse. What am I to think?--] (]) 07:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | Tsk tsk. What a post. From one of our ] patrol and champions of political correctness, and warriors against un] discourse. What am I to think?--] (]) 07:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Go away. I don't need all you editors who spew your inaccurate bullshit trolling me. I'm not on the Wikilove patrol. I dropped that template on someone's talk page a grand total of once. It was the_undertow's, and it was a joke. And I don't fight for ]. I think that it's overused and a bullshit policy for this type of project. People need to be able to express themselves. And in the words of a great editor, ''WP:CIVIL does not say you have the right to be unoffended.'' Too often that's how it's taken. ''']''']''']''' 12:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:52, 15 May 2008
Φ
Continued Behaviour
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Child_pornography&action=history
A while ago, you gave her something of an ultimatum. 'Schelm appears to be doing virtually the same thing whilst gaming the 3RR in the process. She continues to insult IP editors and treat their edits as virtually meaningless "disruption". Maybe this should be discussed by others, but I personally do not see any value in this hardened and previously warned POV warrior. 82.25.179.169 (talk) 22:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: Complete fabrications/harassment from an IP with two edits--one to the article about the Dutch pedophile party that has three members, one to this talkpage.-PetraSchelm (talk) 22:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Lolcatting people's complaints
I won't edit war over this again - please, though, stop adding lolcats. They are insulting to good faith users who are upset and bring a complaint to AN or ANI. They want something constructive being done, not mockery. Neıl ☎ 09:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- And we'll agree to disagree here. I don't think they are insulting, and neither do quite a few others. Incidentally, if you'd like to further discuss the backstory behind the FBI cat image, Bstone, and the like, I'm on IRC right now. ⇒SWATJester 09:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- It would be good if you could refrain from using them when someone is complaining about death threats. I think that's the worst one (Threat Cat) - could you dial that one down, at least? When it comes to receiving death threats, you might think the complainant has simply been trolled, they may well have been trolled, but it's not a pleasant thing to receive for many people. Yes, some of them might need to not take things so seriously, but immediately responding with a lolcat isn't the best way to calm the situation down. I don't use IRC. You can discuss it here, if you like, or email me. Neıl ☎ 10:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- The point of IRC was to speed things up, but it's sort of a non-issue. I'll take your comments under consideration. ⇒SWATJester 10:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- That's a start - thank you. Neıl ☎ 10:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- And we'll agree to disagree here. I don't think they are insulting, and neither do quite a few others. Incidentally, if you'd like to further discuss the backstory behind the FBI cat image, Bstone, and the like, I'm on IRC right now. ⇒SWATJester 09:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
User:Swatjester/lolcats
Epic. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 10:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Psst
The secret no-watermark version of rolfbot is at http://wigflip.com/roflbot/no-watermark. Neıl ☎ 10:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey
Thanks for protecting Club Penguin. The vandalism is just too much to handle PepsiPlunge13™ 13:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the note. It is gratifying to learn that another editor has noticed my edits. Flatscan (talk) 00:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
the undertow
I thought you were just being sarcastic here. Then I checked out the diff. Why is this person still an admin? And what am I supposed to think of individuals who are want him to just get a peaceful time out? OrangeMarlin 06:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe if you people took the time to fucking read the link and the summary, you'd get it. What he said is that White pride and White supremacy are not the same. Something he'd been debating at the time with another user. The link, that you, SWAT, have ignorantly used as "evidence" of his alleged "supremacy" is actually detailing the fucking death of one of his good friends, a MEXICAN. That, FYI, is him letting everyone know that he's not a fucking white supremacist. Maybe you can go correct your libelous statement. Lara❤Love 06:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Tsk tsk. What a post. From one of our WP:Wikilove patrol and champions of political correctness, and warriors against unCIVIL discourse. What am I to think?--Filll (talk) 07:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Go away. I don't need all you editors who spew your inaccurate bullshit trolling me. I'm not on the Wikilove patrol. I dropped that template on someone's talk page a grand total of once. It was the_undertow's, and it was a joke. And I don't fight for WP:CIVIL. I think that it's overused and a bullshit policy for this type of project. People need to be able to express themselves. And in the words of a great editor, WP:CIVIL does not say you have the right to be unoffended. Too often that's how it's taken. Lara❤Love 12:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)