Misplaced Pages

User talk:Kmweber: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:59, 16 May 2008 editUseight (talk | contribs)Bureaucrats, Administrators78,705 editsm added comment← Previous edit Revision as of 23:35, 17 May 2008 edit undoCattleMan (talk | contribs)1,271 edits →Wikiquette alert: new sectionNext edit →
Line 294: Line 294:
==]== ==]==
Hello again. ] project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on ]. I attempted to translate the data from to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. ] (]) 03:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Hello again. ] project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on ]. I attempted to translate the data from to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. ] (]) 03:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

== Wikiquette alert ==

I have filed a Wikiquette alert on you for your oppositions for self noms on rfas. If can be found W] <font face="Arial Black"> ] <sup>]</sup></font> 23:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:35, 17 May 2008

WikiProject Indiana Alerts have been posted:


Articles for deletion

(8 more...)

Categories for discussion

Good article nominees

Requested moves

Articles to be merged

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9

RFA

Right now I'm going thru an odd time. But, logging on and seeing the 1APR RFA made me laugh, and I needed it. Thank you for your sense of humor, sometimes we can use that. :) Regards, NonvocalScream (talk) 13:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD for Shalini Ganendra

I know you have a penchant for humor, but there's a fine line between being humorous and merely being a pest. You're inching perilously close to that line. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

What humor? I'm quite serious. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 21:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Someone hasn't read your userpage. :) Enigma 04:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Speaking of your userpage, the state flag image for the Wikiproject Indiana userbox appears to have been deleted. Enigma 04:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
"Oh my god! They killed png!" (use Image:Flag of Indiana.svg?) Shenme (talk) 05:11, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

ANI

Hello, Kmweber. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Tiptoety 21:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, that is correct. I have started the ANI thread Tiptoety mentioned. Sorry for not notifying you immediately, that was my bad. Nsk92 (talk) 22:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Don't worry about it. It really wasn't necessary, since Tiptoety already let me know, but thanks! Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 22:08, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

John Bot

Natural to ask ;-) The bot operator contacted me asking if I could revert a series of edits by the bot, as there appears to be some kind of problems. I must admit I haven't investigate further. Better to ask Compwhizii himself ;-) Snowolf 23:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry about that. My bot made a boo-boo :) CWii(Talk|Contribs) 00:11, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
I, Valtoras, hereby award a valued contributor with the original barnstar in recognition of all his outstanding contributions to Misplaced Pages. Valtoras (talk) 01:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

FYI

As an arch-inclusionist, you may be entertained by the matter of Ealing Broadway Platform 9 which continues to spawn remarkable developments like Station Jim. I am not soliciting your !vote since I suppose you have stalkers who would follow you there. I just thought it would entertain you. Colonel Warden (talk) 10:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Also, Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Drug Policy was speedily deleted in violation of policy (misapplication of G5). 129.174.91.119 (talk) 01:01, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Libertarian National Convention

Kurt, are you planning on attending the 2008 Libertarian National Convention? Maybe we can meet there... 129.174.91.119 (talk) 17:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

No, I'm not. I don't even know who you are, so why would I want to meet you? Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 18:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
for coming out of the oppose section in RFA's and supporting an RFA. Go Kurt!!! Dusti 18:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
He has already done so in the past, when he deemed the candidates worthy of his support ;-) Snowolf 23:56, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: The man who could have been

Thank you for your wise words. Gwynand | Talk/Contribs 11:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry -- my name certainly is a shortening of "Gail Wynand" from The Fountainhead. You're quote certainly seemed Rand-ian, although I didn't recognize it immediately (haven't actually read that novel in ages). Who says this in the novel? Wynand? Gwynand | Talk/Contribs 11:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Limits of inclusion

I noticed your vote here, which seems to boil down to "if it is verifiable and excists, we should have an article about it". I have been thinking on things related to the issue, and I'd like to hear your opinion on the following: In the area of Alkmaar, the town I live in, every week about 20 soccer matches are played in the amateur competitions. The outcomes of those matches are all published in several newspapers, 2 or 3 each, of which one "real" one, and 1 or 2 sunday only mainly adds, free door to door newspapers. I was wondering what your opinion on those matches is. Do you think we should have articles on those matches? Cheers, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, of course. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 22:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, of course is a bit of a strech here, I think most wikipedias would disagree with you there (and though I haven't found my exact stance on in/exlusionism yet, I also believe we should not have those articles), but thank you for your opinion! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Please consider taking the AGF Challenge

I would like to invite you to consider taking part in the AGF Challenge which has been proposed for use in the RfA process by User: Kim Bruning. You can answer in multiple choice format, or using essay answers, or anonymously. You can of course skip any parts of the Challenge you find objectionable or inadvisable.--Filll (talk) 14:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Even though it failed with 28 supports, 42 opposes, and 15 neutrals, I am grateful for the suggestions and advice I have received and I do hope to improve as a Wikipedian. If you ever need my help in any endeavor, feel free to drop me a line. --Sharkface217 19:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

My RfA...

Thank you... ...for your participation in my RFA, which closed with 85 supports, 2 neutrals and 1 oppose. I'm extremely grateful for all the the kind comments from so many brilliant Wikipedians I've come to respect and admire, as well as many others I've not yet had the pleasure of working with, and I'll do my best to put my shiny new mop and bucket to good use! Once again, thank you ;)
EyeSerene 16:49, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Resilient Barnstar
For not letting crap from people responding to your RFA comments get to you Phoenix-wiki 19:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment

A new template for your convenience and greater speed of commenting, which will make it possible to cover more ground in a shorter time with respect to RFAs...Give this a try! User:Kmweber/Adminship comment‎. Invoke it with {{subst:Kmweber/Adminship comment‎}} Personal use (talk) 21:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Kurt, I deleted this from your talkpage once already, and I'll do it again. Just say the word. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
And Kurt I deleted the said page, as it was a page created by another user in your own userspace. If for some reson you want it undeleted, just ask. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) 23:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

International Negotiation Institute

Sometimes it doesn't hurt to actually check whether something exists before you assert it does.  RGTraynor  14:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Response

The comment was not notable, as I also stated in the edit summary. -- JT 16:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Saying so doesn't make it so. Any relevant information is valid, no matter how "notable" you or anyone else thinks it might be. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 16:59, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:NN would disagree with you. -- JT 17:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Irrelevant. We're not obligated to abide by it. It's meaningless. So-called "rules" are not important; what's best for the encyclopedia is. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 17:24, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Alright, well, if you add it back in, I expect to see every single town in the Midwest added to the list of towns where 911 calls were placed. -- JT 17:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Mount Carmel photos

You're welcome go ahead across the bridge, because as I said on the talk page, I couldn't find the find the cord to the digital camera. However, I did find something that could have saved me $20 if I found it a couple of months ago! I have a nasty cold, so don't expect to do to much editing anytime soon. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 22:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I found the cord to the digital camera, but I'm still sick. I might be able to take a few pictures at some point. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 21:19, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

"Recher theatre" deletion

Hi. With all due respect, this is very much a clear-cut A1 with "little or no context." This doesn't even qualify as a valid stub IMO. Thanks.  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion is inherently wrong. Therefore, it doesn't matter whether it "qualifies" or not. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 20:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Erm... Usually, people use "Therefore" if they're making a conclusion that is supported and based on facts. The statement "Speedy deletion is inherently wrong" is subjective and is not supported by these things known as facts. Thanks. 81.105.28.52 (talk) 08:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Incorrect. Nothing is ever subjective. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 13:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Your comment

Your comment here was a little harsh. While I agree that the user is out of line, a little more courtesy should be expected. Malinaccier Public (talk) 16:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Heads up

Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#KMweber.27s_welcome_template.

Could you please add a link to IAR just for a bit of extra clarity...otherwise, nice work, I like it! dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 11:21, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Heh...by the time I woke up this morning it was already closed. Anyway, I'm not so sure about that...IAR implies that there are in fact rules in the first place, which I categorically deny. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 13:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

I love your new template. I'd like to start using it instead of {{subst:W-basic}}. Please could you give me the code that I'd need to copy and paste? Thank you. Dan Beale-Cocks 13:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

{{subst:User:Kmweber/Welcome template}} Thanks! Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 15:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I also have come to express admiration for your new template. It's very cool. --Sharkface/C 02:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Bamblerose

I'm asking you nicely, Please do not start an edit war over welcome templates. In case you are afraid I'm singling you out I'm placing the exact same message on 87.112.5.130's page. Thank you. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

It's not an edit war. The IP is a known sock of banned user Fredrick day. This particular IP address has already been blocked. His placing of a welcome template himself was fine; his removing my own was not, and so what I am doing is perfectly legitimate. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 14:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I agree that him removing your template was inappropriate. My concern is that by simply reverting his edit it looks like the beginnings of an "edit war" (please forgive me if there is a policy addressing that which I'm unaware of). I've seen most of the discussion going on at AN or ANI and although I may not agree with some of your opinions but, I'm fully behind you expressing them and welcoming new users is always a good thing in my eyes. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Singular They

Hi Mark, I was enjoying reading the boxes on your user page and noticed a conflict - sorry, I am a former copy editor. One box is against the singular they (I agree with you on that) - but another box says the user would choose "their (versus 'his') employess over a one-night stand." Good user page.Kek15 (talk) 15:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

I think you have me confused with another editor. My name is not "Mark." Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 15:38, 25 April 2008
I'm sorry Kurt, but I did mean you and your user page. My apologies for getting your name wrong. Kek15 (talk) 13:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
P.S. I saw your user name at the following thread:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Keeper76&diff=prev&oldid=208142214 I took exception with the way Keeper76 addressed you and also his promise to quash your free speech - just because he didn't agree. In the end, he deleted the thread from his talk page.Kek15 (talk) 13:44, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello

Thanks for the warm welcome. I was just wondering if your message meant i broke a rule or if u were just informing me. Thanks anyway, Jurj (talk) 06:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Deletionpedia Patrol

Deletionpedia Patrol has been launched; I invite you to become a part of this groundbreaking effort. Chin Chill-A Eat Mor Rodents (talk) 15:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

EoGuy

Although I acknowledge a bit of gray area, I mostly disagree. If you look at common usage in respected publications, you are far more likely to see plural used. Each of them was a Beatle, and collectively it simply sounds better to a native English speaker to say that The Beatles are performing rather than The Beatles is performing. The vast majority of English grammarians would agree with that statement. Ward3001 (talk) 17:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Yep, British bands are referred to as "are" instead of "is". This is trodden ground. "The Rolling Stones are", "the Beatles are", and "Oasis are" all British bands. "Foo Fighters is", "Metallica is", and "Kiss is". Get the gist of it now? British grammar treats bands plurally. Hope this clears up any confusion you might have, Kurt. Scarian 17:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Then the British are wrong, aren't they? I see no need to perpetuate wrong grammar. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 17:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Haha, good one. Your sense of humour is immense. Consensus states it on Misplaced Pages. You will be reverted by numerous different editors if you attempt to change British bands from "are" to "is". Additionally, there is no such thing as "incorrect" grammar. I believe it's called "standard" and "non-standard". Thanks! Scarian 17:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
How dare those nasty Brits, trying to change American English! Don't they know that English started ... uh oh ... never mind. Ward3001 (talk) 18:10, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Misplaced Pages namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 02:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

If there was anything that made my day yesterday, it was a support from you :D Thanks Kurt! -- Naerii 15:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter, Issue 4

Apologies for the late delivery; my internet connection went down halfway through the delivery process.

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 4 • 30 April 2008 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot (talk) 22:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Arbitrary Committee

Not sure whether you are still following this ANI thread, but I'm letting you know here, for the record, that I've commented there, initially in your defence and then to object to your use of the phrase "Arbitrary Committee", which I managed to miss entirely when reading that thread (I must have misread it as "Arbitration Committee"). It all got a bit confused, really, but I notified those who I said should apologise to you, so in fairness I'm coming here to ask if you will apologise for what you said? Carcharoth (talk) 09:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC) PS. Sorry this notice is late, but the servers had problems yesterday about the time I was trying to leave you a note.

I have done nothing that requires an apology. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 16:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
As I said, I left the note for the record, because I left similar notes for others. They also didn't see a need to apologise for what they said about you, or they explained why they had said what they said. I'm not going to ask you to explain right now what you mean by "Arbitrary Committee", but do you think you could in future articulate your concerns somewhere relevant, rather than taking pot shots? Carcharoth (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
You may think that you've done nothing that requires an apology Kurt, but continuing to take potshots when you've been asked nicely not to, is something at least I think you should be apologizing for. Again, cut it out. If you have suggestions to improve the ArbitraTION Committee, I suggest that you bring it forward. if all you have is potshots and attacks, I think that it'd be best if you didn't say any thing at all. SirFozzie (talk) 03:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

When an admin removes your comment...

....it's not generally considered a 'smart' move to put it back. HalfShadow (talk) 03:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

It is when there's no valid reason for it to be removed. That you disagree with it does not make it "trolling"...my severe objections to the existence of the Arbitrary Committee and my denial of its legitimacy are well-known, and you're the first to try any stunt like this. Stop it. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 03:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I believe you'll find I am surprisingly apathetic when it comes to what you think; my only interest is in keeping the peace as I see it. If an admin feels your comment is unnecessary, it stays that way until another admin decides otherwise. HalfShadow (talk) 04:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
OK, Kurt, the softsoap approach didn't seem to work, so time to put a bit of steel behind it. Do not continue to edit-war and reinsert potshots at people or institutions that you don't agree with. SirFozzie (talk) 03:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Replacing comments that should not have been removed is not edit-warring. Those who insist on removing those comments are the ones in the wrong. And "Arbitrary Committee" is a perfectly appropriate moniker for an entity for which every single facet of its existence is, indeed, arbitrary. Don't tell me what to do. If the community has a problem with it, I will answer to them. I do not answer to anyone else. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 03:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Considering the members of the community have spoken above, several times over, and told you in no uncertain terms to quit it, I would hope that you would indeed cut it out. SirFozzie (talk) 03:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Two individuals do not a consensus make. I answer to the community, not to two individuals. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 04:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I removed it on the basis of soapboxing at AN/I. Want to whine and complain? There are more appropriate venues, such as WT:RFARB. Ranting in various threads that have no relevance to your topic will only see your discussions removed without notice, and as what has happened at various RFAs and at AN/I, a precedent has already been initiated. seicer | talk | contribs 03:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Actually, this is the first time anything I've said has been removed. It was a perfectly appropriate venue--it was a discussion of a block of one individual, and I was giving my reasons as to why that individual should be unblocked. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 04:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Please don't assume I'm dumb, Kurt. I know about your history, and your bloody minded stubborness on principle. (oppose, self nom=power hunger, etcetera?) All I care about is that you cut out the potshots and not edit war those potshots back in where they don't belong. You haven't so there's nothing that needs to happen. SirFozzie (talk) 08:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
You are a servant, not a master; therefore, you are not entitled to enforce your own will but only the will of the community. Show me the community at large has a problem with it. So far every indication is that it doesn't. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 14:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Your edit to User:SirFozzie/Accountability

Please explain this to SirFozzie. I'm not sure whether it's a joke or serious. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 15:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

He's serious. While I consider it frivolous and unsupportable, it's his right, per the terms I've set. SirFozzie (talk) 23:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
I added my request. It was based on the exchange above. It was not appropriate for SirFozzie to threaten Kmweber as he did. This is a request that SirFozzie relinquish his admin bit, per his promise to do so if requested by five users in a two week period. I'm certainly not going to campaign for this, and I have little opinion about SirFozzie in general, but the little example I saw here raised concern already, for me, and when I saw this questioning of Kmweber for making the request, I looked, and thought about it carefully. On the one hand, I congratulate SirFozzie for his courage in making the Accountability promise. On the other, the promise is there for a reason. If SirFozzie apologizes to Kmweber, I expect I would withdraw my request. As to being "frivolous and unsupportable," there is a real issue here, and that SirFozzie thinks it frivolous is one reason I'm taking it seriously. It is like some actual removals of the sysop bit I've seen: an initial offense, relatively mild, becomes a real problem when the offender doesn't get it and defends and even responds more intensely (though the threats may have stopped). Administrators are properly servants of the community, not of their own opinions, and should tread lightly and carefully. If Kmweber committed some offense, pursue it. Don't threaten him for doing what he has a right to do. And if you make a mistake, admit it and we can all move on.--Abd (talk) 02:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I asked him not to edit war his attacks (Arbitrary Committee, etcetera) back in, he didn't any further (he was at 2 or 3 Reverts when I asked, (note, none of the reverts were mine)) and as far as I was concerned the issue was resolved, and I never followed up on it or anything, until Mr Weber showed up on my recall page. I can show you the time stamps of the whole thing, if you want. I honestly do not think that I've done anything wrong here (of course, I would say that, wouldn't I?). My frivolous and unsupportable comment was that I found it unusual that he wanted to have me recalled for enforcing policies on civility and personal attacks, that's all. SirFozzie (talk) 02:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Vivio Testarossa

Your oppose here made me giggle. Just FYI. Qb | 15:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

question

I'm just curious as to why you have a big, ugly, red linked image in one of the infoboxes on your userpage (the infobox saying you're a member of WikiProject Indiana). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 18:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi :)

Hi Kurt!

Missed some debates lately :) Was wondering if you could kindly point me of where you explained you reasons why you dislikes the coachees :)

Also, when you're around on IRC, could you give me a ping? ;-)

See you, Snowolf 04:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

WBOSITG's RfA

Hello Kmweber, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for your participation in my RfA which was passed with a final tally of 114/10/4. I'm both shocked and honoured to gain so much support from users whom I admire and trust, and I hope I can avoid breaking that backing by being the best administrator I possibly can. I will take on board the opposition's comments and I hope to improve over the coming months and years. Once again, thank you! weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 20:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Wow

What can I say? One the one hand I applaud your ability to pierce Obama's rhetoric and shake off his Svengali-like influence. On the other, I fear you've gone so far over the top, there's no more up or down! Dlohcierekim 18:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

AN/I

Someone's calling for your head on AN/I. Just FYI, WilyD 21:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

As a followup to that: If Travellingcari (talk · contribs) expresses an opinion saying some article should be deleted, it does not make her a "deletionist vandal". Misplaced Pages is a community, and as such the community can make up its own viewpoints of what articles are notable. Misplaced Pages is also an encyclopedia, and the community is formed to support the encyclopedia. I'm starting to wonder if you have an interest in supporting either. --Elkman 22:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

As an FYI

You are the subject of a thread on ANI (that I didn't start) located here. Saw that you weren't yet informed. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind, above post links to the same thing (not sure why it wasn't an edit conflict...) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:HAU

Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 03:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikiquette alert

I have filed a Wikiquette alert on you for your oppositions for self noms on rfas. If can be found WHere Trees Rock 23:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Kmweber: Difference between revisions Add topic