Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:12, 23 May 2008 editBedford (talk | contribs)30,292 edits Articles created/expanded on May 23← Previous edit Revision as of 01:24, 23 May 2008 edit undoWilhelmina Will (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers348,378 edits Articles created/expanded on May 23Next edit →
Line 68: Line 68:
*... that ''']''', a female pirate, is most well-known for being the last woman to be hanged in ]? Self-nom. ] (]) 00:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC) *... that ''']''', a female pirate, is most well-known for being the last woman to be hanged in ]? Self-nom. ] (]) 00:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
:Not sure about the reference, but the length is good. The fact she was the first American-born female pirate might be her more notable claim.--] <sup>]</sup> 01:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC) :Not sure about the reference, but the length is good. The fact she was the first American-born female pirate might be her more notable claim.--] <sup>]</sup> 01:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
::ALT:
**... that ''']''' was the first American-born female pirate? ] (])


=== Articles created/expanded on May 22 === === Articles created/expanded on May 22 ===

Revision as of 01:24, 23 May 2008

For discussion of the "Did you know" section, see Misplaced Pages talk:Did you know.
William Plumer JacobsWilliam Plumer Jacobs

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page. Eligible articles may only be up to 5 days old; for details see these rules.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main PageT:DYK
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or expanded (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles that have been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. (The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.)
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • preferably cited in the article with an inline citation.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely-licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as ] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by ]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by ] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by ]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by ] and ~~~~
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|January 21}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
] Yes No problems, ready for DYK
] Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
] Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix.
] No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

2025-01-21T00:00:00Z

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Misplaced Pages:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on May 23

Not sure about the reference, but the length is good. The fact she was the first American-born female pirate might be her more notable claim.--Bedford 01:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
ALT:

Articles created/expanded on May 22

Articles created/expanded on May 21

Double "close"? --74.13.130.176 (talk) 05:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
:) Thanks! Vishnava(talk) 12:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
How about "to commemorate" instead of "to memorialize"? --74.13.130.176 (talk) 05:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Benedict Arnold
Benedict Arnold

Articles created/expanded on May 20

Mary Shelley
Mary Shelley
  • ... that the Dictionary of Information Security by Robert Slade has five forewords? -self-nom, new article.
Minor disclaimer re: COI, once in the past week I saw an editor mention WP:COI here because they were related to the subject of their article: Mr. Slade mentioned me in one of his books, not this one, and besides one or two emails, I have never met him. Thanks. —SusanLesch (talk) 22:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • ... that World War II fighter ace Franz Barten is credited for shooting down a total of 55 enemy aircraft?
or,
(alt hook)*... that Major William Herwerth died while on duty as lighthouse keeper at Bluff Point Light in 1881? new, self nom TravellingCari 19:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • I think this is a POV. They are accused by who? Accused by Indian intelligence? Have they admitted to have a tie with ISI? If not, then why would a POV allegation be an interesting fact? --Ragib (talk) 18:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I agree that it is a loaded statement. Thus, I've changed the nom altogether. Vishnava(talk) 18:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC
New version *... that Bangladeshi intelligence agencies are responsible for gathering foreign intelligence, military intelligence as well as monitoring internal security? Vishnava(talk) 18:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
The new version sounds fine by me. --Ragib (talk) 18:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Article as written seems to fail WP:Band notability tests. --Stlemur (talk) 18:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
What? No, it meets criteria 1 (subject of multiple non-trivial published works - see articles in Guardian and Times), 11 (Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network - see appearances on BBC Electric Proms). Neıl 07:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
With the addition of those sources I agree it meets (1), thinly. --Stlemur (talk) 08:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Those sources have been in the article since it was created. Please review articles more carefully. Neıl 17:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 19

Currently up for AfD and therefore can't appear on the main page. I also unbolded the link to Morehouse College since it's not the new article. Olaf Davis | Talk 15:31, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Alt hook (moving an item that I added here independently -- not saying my hook is better, just putting them next to each other for comparison. -Pete (talk) 01:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC))


  • ... that the baesuk is a Korean traditional fruit punch made by simmering slices of Korean pear, black peppercorns, ginger, honey or sugar, and water? -Self-nom--Appletrees (talk) 13:54, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Nice article on a much needed area, but I am not sure about using another encyclopedia as a source. Misplaced Pages:Reliable_source_examples#History says: "General encyclopedias, like the Encyclopedia Britannica or Encarta, sometimes have authoritative signed articles written by specialists and including references. However, unsigned entries are written in batches by freelancers and must be used with caution." --BorgQueen (talk) 16:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
      • ???? The references which you're mentioning are Korean encyclopedia with high credential in South Korea. The articles are written by a lot of Korean experts and scholars, not written by just some freelancers or bloggers. Since Korean cuisine is not introduced to the West as much as those of Chinese/Japanese/Vietnamese/Thai cuisines, English resources are scarce except well known dishes. If I create or expand Korean related articles to some quality from stubs, I have to use very good Korean sources. I think you mistake the hosted portals such as naver and empas with the main information providers from the encyclopedias; Doosan Encyclopedia, EncyKorea. Besides, even Korean branches of Britannica, or Pascal do not state writers' names on their articles but emphasize the brand name. I think it is a cultural difference, not arguable distrust. I don't see what is problem with my writing except minor grammatical errors.--Appletrees (talk) 16:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
        • I was under the impression that general encyclopedias are not considered as best references, as it is written on the page I linked above. But I just realized that the page is not a guideline or policy... I suppose it is fine to use them as long as it does not contradict other sources. (No, I am not confusing those portals with the encyclopedias.) As I said, you've written a nice article. --BorgQueen (talk) 17:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Linden MacIntyre
Linden MacIntyre
Hotel Bellevue Palace
Hotel Bellevue Palace
Jacopo Sannazaro
Jacopo Sannazaro
Dutch Bantam rooster
Dutch Bantam rooster
This hook appears to be reporting some old sports news. Anything more interesting from this annual game? --74.14.17.166 (talk) 18:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Admiral Sir John Moore
Admiral Sir John Moore
Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich of Russia
Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich of Russia
Dow Ber Meisels
Dow Ber Meisels
  • ... that it is since Jayadeva Goswami wrote a famous poem Gita Govinda in the twelfth century of the Common Era, that the topic of the spiritual loving affair between the divine Radha Krishna, has become a theme celebrated throughout India for many centuries in ritual, festival, and all the arts?
  • 294 character hook. Also, "between the divine Radha Krishna" doesn't make sense in English. Between the divine Radha Krishna and whom? The article implies "Radha Krishna" means "Radha and Krishna", but Americans don't know that, and they would assume Radha Krishna is one being. Art LaPella (talk) 00:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 18

OR ... that Clan Campbell of Cawdor is a Scottish clan which currently does not have a recognised clan chief?
needs an inline citation per the Instructions. Date and length are fine. Olaf Davis | Talk 15:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Why on earth does this article, with its one reference, require an inline citation? The whole article is derived from and verified by the single cited source. -- Theramin (talk) 22:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment: Perhaps it should have more sources provided, so that they may be cited. The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! (talk) 22:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
What do you mean by "the more famous"? --74.13.130.176 (talk) 06:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
A fair point. However, the crux of the hook is that the two were separated by three hundred years, which First Congress of Vienna doesn't say at all (nor does its reference), and Congress of Vienna doesn't inline-cite. The anon above also makes a good point about the use of the phrase 'more famous'. I'm not really sure how one would cite that, though. Anyone have suggestions? Olaf Davis | Talk 10:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, you want a reference that 1815-300=1515? Try ghits for "more famous": "Congress of Vienna in 1815" = 24,600; "Congress of Vienna in 1515" = 9. This is getting ridiculous. The policy above only say hooks should "preferably cited in the article with an inline citation", and both these points are too well known to require citation under WP:REF. Johnbod (talk) 23:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Buckland Windmill
Buckland Windmill
Brixton windmill
Brixton windmill
Thomas Jefferson Ramsdell
Thomas Jefferson Ramsdell
Rotunda Museum
Rotunda Museum
All Saints Church, Patcham
All Saints Church, Patcham
Albert Memorial
Albert Memorial
Statue of Hippolyte Delaroche seated, Frieze Facing East
Statue of Hippolyte Delaroche seated, Frieze Facing East
Northeast? --74.13.130.176 (talk) 06:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I removed the image, because it is a non-free, which we can't use here. --BorgQueen (talk) 05:46, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
OR
OR

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on May 17

File:Ardents.jpg
St Patrick's Church, Hove UK
St Patrick's Church, Hove UK
  • →Another Brighton & Hove church with three possible hooks: (self-nom)
  • ... that most of the interior of the 19th-century St Patrick's Church, Hove has been rebuilt as a 22-bed night shelter which includes "MiPods", a variation on the 1970s "sleep capsule" concept?
  • ... that the extent to which music was used in services in the early years at St Patrick's Church, Hove led to it being referred to mockingly as "Paddy's Music Hall"?
  • ... that the north window at St Patrick's Church, Hove—a memorial to its first curate, Dr James O'Brien, and his wife—was installed 14 years before they died?
Self-nom. I don't know if the ref is good for the first (it's to the shelter's charity's own website), although it's very interesting! The second is relatively unexciting. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 23:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
OR
OR
IMdB is not a reliable source. 02:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 16

There are few more days to expand the article. --PFHLai (talk) 02:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Not anymore! --74.13.130.176 (talk) 06:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Why can't it go on the main page? It's long enough and the ref checks out! (lol) Mjroots (talk) 14:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I've bolded the RFA instead of the log ;). Mjroots (talk) 14:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
You've earned it with all of your hard work! Royalbroil 04:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Not sure if subject meets notability requirements. :D LOL --Bedford 00:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Jealous? --74.13.130.176 (talk) 06:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Samuel Huston
Samuel Huston
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Article mentions the county shift but not the change in political parties. Daniel Case (talk) 12:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Fixed, now shows Democrat first, then Republican. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Hook reference doesn't look reliable to me - correct me if I'm wrong. Olaf Davis | Talk 08:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
"poor tenants"? impoverished? ok. unfortunate? no. --74.13.130.176 (talk) 06:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on May 15

  • Actually, much of the article is based on geocities sites and other unreliable sources. Besides, relying solely on primary sources would also be problematic.--Carabinieri (talk) 00:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Which article? The359 (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
I assume its the Woodhouse Grove School, but it doesn't look like this is a five-fold expansion within the last five days. BuddingJournalist 19:38, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
It does appear to be the Woodhouse article. I think it's skirting the edge of the 5-day rule (21stCenturyGreenstuff's edits to this article began on May 9th, but he really only reached 5x expansion today). However, the hook used here is poorly worded and uninteresting. It presents no unique factoid other than saying exactly what the school is. The359 (talk) 21:26, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Reads like an ad anyhow, I've tagged it accordingly. Gatoclass (talk) 07:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, not a five-fold expansion. —SusanLesch (talk) 08:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Cited source for ranch size 404s; other one doesn't have a footnote. Daniel Case (talk) 13:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Also, ranches.org, which is used repeatedly in the article doesn't appear to be a reliable source to me.--Carabinieri (talk) 00:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Article started 16 May. Looked but I couldn't quickly fix the 404s. —SusanLesch (talk) 08:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
IMdB isn't an acceptable source for this sort of thing. Daniel Case (talk) 13:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

See also

Category:
Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions Add topic