Revision as of 12:11, 19 June 2008 editSpecies8473 (talk | contribs)Rollbackers1,200 edits edit war← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:17, 19 June 2008 edit undoAndonic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users36,449 edits →Block.: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== Edit war == | == Edit war == | ||
Hello, I have ] you for violation of the ] with your edits on ] -. I believe the other editor was correct on the issue with the sources you introduced, and the version you reverted to also has a dead link in the ''See also'' section of the article, while removing other appropriate links. I would also appreciate if you remove the warning from my ], as I have done no edits at all to the article. The extra warning you put on my user page was already identified as vandalism and removed by another editor . ] (]) 12:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC) | Hello, I have ] you for violation of the ] with your edits on ] -. I believe the other editor was correct on the issue with the sources you introduced, and the version you reverted to also has a dead link in the ''See also'' section of the article, while removing other appropriate links. I would also appreciate if you remove the warning from my ], as I have done no edits at all to the article. The extra warning you put on my user page was already identified as vandalism and removed by another editor . ] (]) 12:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Block. == | |||
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|· ] <sup>]</sup> 12:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> · ] <sup>]</sup> 12:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:17, 19 June 2008
Thank you for experimenting with the page Enron on Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 18:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Misplaced Pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Emperor Genius (talk) 11:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --Emperor Genius (talk) 10:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Great power
Would you mind actually checking the talk page for once instead of saying that I never do? -- UKPhoenix79 (talk) 10:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
- Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- UKPhoenix79 (talk) 10:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Edit war
Hello, I have reported you for violation of the three revert rule with your edits on Great power -123456. I believe the other editor was correct on the issue with the sources you introduced, and the version you reverted to also has a dead link in the See also section of the article, while removing other appropriate links. I would also appreciate if you remove the warning from my talk page, as I have done no edits at all to the article. The extra warning you put on my user page was already identified as vandalism and removed by another editor 7. Species8473 (talk) 12:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)