User talk:Satori Son: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:17, 27 June 2008 editSindhian (talk \| contribs)596 edits →Being bullied and ganged up against ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:03, 27 June 2008 edit undoSatori Son (talk \| contribs)Administrators23,261 edits →Being bullied and ganged up: reply and refer to WP:MEDCAB Next edit →
Line 53:		Line 53:

	I need your help. If you look at CPI(M) page you will see my edits have been reverted by a number of people which include at least		I need your help. If you look at CPI(M) page you will see my edits have been reverted by a number of people which include at least
		⚫	*Soman
		⚫	*Ism schism
		⚫	*75.175.29.40
		⚫	They have been reverting my edits and seem to be working in Tandem to block users. Please look into the history of CPI(M) page and see how many times Soman and other users have blanked edits which is critical of CPI(M). I see many good authors have been forced to leave and a lot of intresting material lost. Kindly investigate so that we can ensure that the article is balanced and no one is victimized. {{unsigned\|Sindhian\|18:16, June 27, 2008 (UTC)}}

			:Hello Sindhian. I am sincerely sorry you are feeling bullied. Most editors here on Misplaced Pages are reasonable and collaborative, so please try to keep an open mind about what others are saying to you. Also, I fully realize that Misplaced Pages can be a tough place for newcomers who don't yet know all the customs and procedures. It can be difficult, but try not to take the criticism and rule-citing personally.
⚫	Soman
			:I don't know all the facts of the situation, but my suggestion to you is this: Go to ] and submit a request for assistance. The MedCab is staffed with volunteer editors who are extremely experienced in this sort of dispute resolution. If they are unable to informally help you resolve the situation, they can direct you to other processes which may be more helpful.

			:Also, please remember to follow all relevant Misplaced Pages policies, especially ] and ]. By following the rules, other editors are more likely to listen to your opinion and help you implement your edits in the proper way. Good luck! — <span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">]</span> 19:03, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
⚫	Ism schism

⚫	75.175.29.40

⚫	They have been reverting my edits and seem to be working in Tandem to block users. Please look into the history of CPI(M) page and see how many times Soman and other users have blanked edits which is critical of CPI(M). I see many good authors have been forced to leave and a lot of intresting material lost. Kindly investigate so that we can ensure that the article is balanced and no one is victimized.

Revision as of 19:03, 27 June 2008

Please click here to leave me a new message. I will reply here on this page, so please temporarily watch this page.
If you are here to reply to a comment I left on your talk page, please reply over there — I will watch your page.

Archives

Fair use rationale for Image:Auto Mag.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Auto Mag.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Misplaced Pages's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Y Fixed for Automobile Magazine article. — Satori Son 21:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

AC/DC

Vandalism has picked up again; I think you should semi-protect it. indopug (talk) 15:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected for one month. — Satori Son 17:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Re Your message to User 129.62.170.157

You should back off from User 129.62.170.157. May I remind you of Misplaced Pages's policy concerning blanking user talk pages?

"User talk pages Users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages, though archiving is preferred. They may also remove some content in archiving. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. This specifically includes both registered and anonymous users."

24.155.14.119 (talk) 02:41, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your message.

First of all, that addition to the language of Misplaced Pages:User page was made just three months ago. For several years, it has been widely accepted that "IP talk pages" are not "user pages" that fall under the guidelines of WP:USER. I do not believe there is an established consensus for that change, and I have raised the matter with editors who know a little more of the recent conversations.

Second, you are incorrect in stating WP:USER is a policy. It is only a guideline, and that distinction is quite significant.

Finally, even if this change to the advisory guideline stays, which I am not convinced it will, it is one that I will occasionally choose to ignore when I believe my edits are in the best interests of the project. Thank you. — Satori Son 15:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Thank you for the note on my talk page. Rather than run a parallel discussion, I replied to your query at WT:UP. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 16:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Great - thanks so much. — Satori Son 17:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Dottie Rambo

Hey Satori Son! Long time no talk to. I wanted to ask why the edit was done to the Dottie Rambo page in reference to the Hall of Fame? The reasoning was that it was mentioned in the list. Well, if we go with that argument, then we will have to remove the Grammy and Dove Award verbiage as well. They too are mentioned in the list. I think we could have a compromise here and find a better way of saying it so that it too can be left in the header. Thought? It is great to see you again! Canyouhearmenow 18:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Good to hear from you again! Hope all is going well.

You're talking the Dottie Rambo's awards article, right? I do think more needs to be trimmed from the introduction. Since it's a list article, the intro should be very brief instead of listing awards then redundantly listing them again below. Similar to List of Björk awards and nominations, List of Christina Aguilera awards, List of Carrie Underwood awards, List of Frank Sinatra awards, etc. Also, the article name needs to be changed to List of Dottie Rambo awards. — Satori Son 19:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

OK I fixed the header and the link as well. I think you should be happy with that kind sir! Again, its great to run into you again. Canyouhearmenow 20:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Looks great. I went ahead and did a history merge so now the new article has the full history and Dottie Rambo's awards is a redirect. Thanks. — Satori Son 20:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Culzean clock tower.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Culzean clock tower.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

This bot is woefully inadequate for this purpose... — Satori Son 21:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Being bullied and ganged up

Dear Satori Son,

I need your help. If you look at CPI(M) page you will see my edits have been reverted by a number of people which include at least

Soman
Ism schism
75.175.29.40

They have been reverting my edits and seem to be working in Tandem to block users. Please look into the history of CPI(M) page and see how many times Soman and other users have blanked edits which is critical of CPI(M). I see many good authors have been forced to leave and a lot of intresting material lost. Kindly investigate so that we can ensure that the article is balanced and no one is victimized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sindhian (talk • contribs) 18:16, June 27, 2008 (UTC)

Hello Sindhian. I am sincerely sorry you are feeling bullied. Most editors here on Misplaced Pages are reasonable and collaborative, so please try to keep an open mind about what others are saying to you. Also, I fully realize that Misplaced Pages can be a tough place for newcomers who don't yet know all the customs and procedures. It can be difficult, but try not to take the criticism and rule-citing personally.

I don't know all the facts of the situation, but my suggestion to you is this: Go to Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal and submit a request for assistance. The MedCab is staffed with volunteer editors who are extremely experienced in this sort of dispute resolution. If they are unable to informally help you resolve the situation, they can direct you to other processes which may be more helpful.

Also, please remember to follow all relevant Misplaced Pages policies, especially Misplaced Pages:Three-revert rule and Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view. By following the rules, other editors are more likely to listen to your opinion and help you implement your edits in the proper way. Good luck! — Satori Son 19:03, 27 June 2008 (UTC)