| Revision as of 00:14, 28 June 2008 editEmpireForever (talk | contribs)84 edits ←Blanked the page← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:49, 28 June 2008 edit undoC.Fred (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators278,355 edits Please don't provoke other editorsNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Your comment at User talk:Bardcom== | |||
| Re: | |||
| :90% of the pages Bardcom edits, ] may be a good place to begin. EmpireForever (talk) 00:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| You know rather a lot about the situation for an account so new to Misplaced Pages. While I want to ] that you stumbled across the debate by accident, I must also consider that you were either recruited to join in this discussion by another involved party, or that you are another party looking to join in the discussion with an account with a clean edit summary. | |||
| Regardless of why you made the account, your edit history—including the accusatory talk page comments and the edit summaries that accuse another editor of trying to "flout policy"—give the appearance that you're trying to bait said user into a edit that's over-the-line. And that is a problem: such conduct is a breach of ]. | |||
| If you're here to work ''with'' other editors and build Misplaced Pages together, then welcome. If you're here to work ''against'' other editors and provoke them, I would encourage you to reconsider. —''']''' (]) 00:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:49, 28 June 2008
Your comment at User talk:Bardcom
Re:
- 90% of the pages Bardcom edits, Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Bardcom may be a good place to begin. EmpireForever (talk) 00:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
You know rather a lot about the situation for an account so new to Misplaced Pages. While I want to assume good faith that you stumbled across the debate by accident, I must also consider that you were either recruited to join in this discussion by another involved party, or that you are another party looking to join in the discussion with an account with a clean edit summary.
Regardless of why you made the account, your edit history—including the accusatory talk page comments and the edit summaries that accuse another editor of trying to "flout policy"—give the appearance that you're trying to bait said user into a edit that's over-the-line. And that is a problem: such conduct is a breach of the civility policy.
If you're here to work with other editors and build Misplaced Pages together, then welcome. If you're here to work against other editors and provoke them, I would encourage you to reconsider. —C.Fred (talk) 00:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)