Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:46, 1 July 2008

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.

Military history: Russian & Soviet Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. Associated task forces: /  Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Requested move

Note: there's a related move request at Talk:Narodnoe_Opolcheniye#Requested_move. Biruitorul 14:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Leningrad Narodnoe Opolcheniye Army → Leningrad People's Militia Army — See WP:UE - English is preferred. —Biruitorul 03:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Biruitorul, you know full well this is not the only English translation used for the article as this was brought up on the main Project page. The function of the Narodnoe Opolcheniye was never that of a militia, and it does not translate as People's Militia either. This move is nothing but a cause to provoke conflict before an RfC has been conducted--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 00:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Kindly assume good faith and refrain from speculating on what I "know full well". I know of no RfC - I merely know that I saw a title I thought should be changed and brought it to RM for consideration. If you oppose the move, by all means say so, but do try and do this without veering into speculation on my motives. Biruitorul 03:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

I assume nothing. How did you come across the article? Its interesting how you are selective about preference for English--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 08:52, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:AGF is a fundamental guideline and you would do well to respect it. How I came across the page, and speculation about my alleged "selective preference" for English, is not germane to the topic at hand. Biruitorul 14:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Misplaced Pages's naming conventions.

Discussion

Any additional comments:

• Start-Class military history articles
• Start-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
• Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles