Misplaced Pages

User talk:Arcticocean: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:00, 4 September 2008 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits FYI: Response← Previous edit Revision as of 20:41, 4 September 2008 edit undoArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators46,424 edits FYI: Clarify.Next edit →
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 34: Line 34:
:::I am saying no more about the matter, pending Fyslee's response. ] ] 19:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC) :::I am saying no more about the matter, pending Fyslee's response. ] ] 19:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
::::Frankly, it is irrelevant any kind of response by Fyslee. This is about a sockpuppet is editing on Misplaced Pages. If you are not interested in dealing with this matter you could of just explained that from the beginning. Again, I have provided solid evidence CorticoSpinal has returned. Is the evidence satisfactory for you? Or, you are not interested in dealing with this matter anymore. ] 20:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC) ::::Frankly, it is irrelevant any kind of response by Fyslee. This is about a sockpuppet is editing on Misplaced Pages. If you are not interested in dealing with this matter you could of just explained that from the beginning. Again, I have provided solid evidence CorticoSpinal has returned. Is the evidence satisfactory for you? Or, you are not interested in dealing with this matter anymore. ] 20:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
:::::Apologies, I should have mentioned that from the start: no, I didn't intend to deal with this (from a blocking point of view, that is), and won't be taking any action on the matter. I have just noted Vassyana's message, and respectfully defer back to him again, or any uninvolved administrator. Fresh eyes are what's needed here, however: I've already dealt with this matter once; somebody totally uninvolved should process the remainder of the issues outstanding. Oh, and yes, with respect, I do find Fyslee's opinion important, QuackGuru. ] ] 20:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:41, 4 September 2008

User:AGK/Header

FYI

User:Soyuz113 User talk:208.101.118.33 CorticoSpinal has returned. QuackGuru 18:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Why are you supporting a sockpuppet? QuackGuru 19:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
I am not supporting him; I am choosing to extend a second chance here. We'll see how it goes for him.
Anthøny 19:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
FYI, I have contacted a top ranking admin by e-mail about the disruptive sockpuppets. QuackGuru 21:21, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you mean. My judgement with this is not acceptable? I'm very sorry if that's true. Anthøny 21:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
FYI, User_talk:Vassyana#Protection. Vassyana (talk) 03:20, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
This is a rather shocking development, when an admin single-handedly ignores a three time community sanction and violates its trust by allowing abusive sockpuppetry, thus becoming a party to the crime. More. This is pretty serious and I will support any attempts to get this dealt with at the highest levels, including removal of admin tools and rights. -- Fyslee / talk 14:29, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
What can I say, but "that's simply preposterous," Fyslee. I'm not seeing any disruption from that account. It's not been confirmed as a sock puppet, and indeed there's no evidence been presented thus far to suggest that the account is owned by the user that it is.
Going along with the suggestion that it was, I left a message that was angled towards a "you are Cortigo, I presume?", with no hinting of my intention to block. Tricky, I suppose, but also gaining his trust; if he truly wants to edit, perhaps I could offer the chance for him to do so.
Then again, he hasn't edited since 2 September. This isn't a currently pending issue. That you are calling for desysoppings is frankly insulting, and I would suggest you retract that statement. There is no evidence at present (bar two editors' blank statements that he is a sock puppet -- I prefer to see solid evidence, regardless of the standing of the editors), and I am not going to take action on your instruction.
Anthøny 19:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Here is solid evidence CorticoSpinal has returned to Misplaced Pages. It seems like he forgot to log in. QuackGuru 19:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
I am saying no more about the matter, pending Fyslee's response. Anthøny 19:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Frankly, it is irrelevant any kind of response by Fyslee. This is about a sockpuppet is editing on Misplaced Pages. If you are not interested in dealing with this matter you could of just explained that from the beginning. Again, I have provided solid evidence CorticoSpinal has returned. Is the evidence satisfactory for you? Or, you are not interested in dealing with this matter anymore. QuackGuru 20:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Apologies, I should have mentioned that from the start: no, I didn't intend to deal with this (from a blocking point of view, that is), and won't be taking any action on the matter. I have just noted Vassyana's message, and respectfully defer back to him again, or any uninvolved administrator. Fresh eyes are what's needed here, however: I've already dealt with this matter once; somebody totally uninvolved should process the remainder of the issues outstanding. Oh, and yes, with respect, I do find Fyslee's opinion important, QuackGuru. Anthøny 20:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Arcticocean: Difference between revisions Add topic