| Revision as of 08:51, 12 June 2008 editRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 15 current discussions← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:43, 5 September 2008 edit undoHarej (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,255 edits redirect | ||
| (86 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| '''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:''' | |||
| * ] Is there enough support for alternative start dates to be considered the viewpoint of, at least, a significant minority? | |||
| * ] There is a dispute about the neutrality of the article between ] and ], with admin ] and a few others sometimes involved in the discussion. There are basically two versions being argued for here. [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title | |||
| * ] Need support of third party to request mediation unless you can think of a way to solve reversion and disputes | |||
| * ] Should order be described as "revived." Does it "claim" sovereignty or does it have sovereignty? | |||
| * ] This was a national troop type that can not be readily translated into English, with a variety of translations offered (see copious sources above). The naming in Misplaced Pages is based on the same principle as that used for ]s, ]s and ] | |||
| * ] GADA 601 is an article about a South American military unit, the majority of the article covers a war with the British. Which form of English spelling should be used? | |||
| * ] there are several issues involved 1)that at the operation was not a combine/joint operation between the Red Army and the Yugoslav Army at the planing involving higher headquarters, but only involved front-line incidental cooperation at tactical level as required on those occasions when the troops from the two forces encountered each other; 2) That when this encounter occurred, the Yugoslav troops came under command of the Red Army (I need to provide a source for this, but English sources seem rare); 3) that the sources provided by User:DIRECTOR are valid, one being derived from a very general reference in the Library of Congress country dara entry, and others from a site the owner of which admitted they are not referenced (even if true) | |||
| * ] The opposition to renaming this article is based on the suggestion that another article can not be created to list pre-1907 occupations due to difficulty in defining the term | |||
| * ] Is it appropriate to use a represntative quote by the book's author stated it's main thesis, as well as quotes from favorable book reviews, even if some editors find the POV of the book objectionable | |||
| * ] Is the "Master Mahan | |||
| * ] Deleting of WWII USHMM pictures | |||
| {{#ifeq:{{{hide_instructions}}}|yes| |{{RFC tagging instructions|RFChist}} }} | |||
| <noinclude>''For more information, see ]''</noinclude> | |||
Latest revision as of 23:43, 5 September 2008
Redirect to: