| Revision as of 19:18, 10 September 2008 editTiptoety (talk | contribs)47,300 edits →Bogorm: cm← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:12, 10 September 2008 edit undoHodja Nasreddin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers31,217 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| 209.172.104.100 is probably a proxy of some kind and I have blocked it for 6 months. As such, a relationship between these users is {{inconclusive}}. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | 209.172.104.100 is probably a proxy of some kind and I have blocked it for 6 months. As such, a relationship between these users is {{inconclusive}}. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *{{takenote}} I think ] pretty much covers it though. ] <sup>]</sup> 19:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | *{{takenote}} I think ] pretty much covers it though. ] <sup>]</sup> 19:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Either that was Bogorm, or that was his impostor who acted very quickly to get Bogorm blocked for block evasion. Either way, it was right to block this IP.] (]) 22:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:12, 10 September 2008
Bogorm
| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 18:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC) |
- Bogorm (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 209.172.104.100 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- Code letter: FG
- Supporting evidence: I need to verify if I should revert a block extension:
- Bogorm was recently briefly blocked by Tiptoety (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) and upon expiry, he/she immediately launched into attacks on Tiptoety, both on his talk page, and bringing ridiculous allegations to ANI.
- This eventually led to me blocking Bogorm, immediately after which, this IP popped up and made similar allegations on my talk page. Both unrelated user Biophys (talk · contribs) and I concluded that the IP was Bogorm (per WP:Duck), which Bogorm denies.
- As a result, I extended Bogorm's block and if I was incorrect, I should reduce it back to the original length I had set. Please verify that I made the right call or prove me wrong. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 18:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
209.172.104.100 is probably a proxy of some kind and I have blocked it for 6 months. As such, a relationship between these users is 
Inconclusive. Sam Korn 18:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Note: I think this pretty much covers it though. Tiptoety 19:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Either that was Bogorm, or that was his impostor who acted very quickly to get Bogorm blocked for block evasion. Either way, it was right to block this IP.Biophys (talk) 22:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)