Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:20, 21 October 2008 editNudve (talk | contribs)6,815 edits Articles created/expanded on October 21: nom Amos Keinan← Previous edit Revision as of 15:26, 21 October 2008 edit undoNvvchar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers41,625 edits Articles created/expanded on October 21Next edit →
Line 77: Line 77:
===Articles created/expanded on October 21=== ===Articles created/expanded on October 21===
<!-- PLEASE leave spaces between the nominations. It helps those reviewing ... and picking --> <!-- PLEASE leave spaces between the nominations. It helps those reviewing ... and picking -->
]
---that local people of ] has established a noble tradition of a compassionate act of ‘Bird Feeding’ by offering grains of 5 quintals every day to ]s.


] ]

Revision as of 15:26, 21 October 2008

For discussion of the "Did you know" section, see Misplaced Pages talk:Did you know.
Flag of MozambiqueFlag of Mozambique

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main PageT:DYK
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose main body text has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. For Mac users, Apple has a Word counter widget available for Mac OS X 10.4 or later. Note:The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely-licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as ] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Suggested sounds should have similar qualities to pictures, and should be formatted using the format {{DYK Listen|filename.ogg|Brief description}}
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by ]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by ] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by ]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by ] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|January 22}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.

Symbols

  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Next update

DYK queue status

There are currently 6 filled queues – all good, for now!

Earliest time for next DYK update: 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Current time: 20:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Update frequency: once every 24 hours

Last updated: 20 hours ago( )


Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Misplaced Pages:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on October 21

---that local people of Khichan has established a noble tradition of a compassionate act of ‘Bird Feeding’ by offering grains of 5 quintals every day to Demoiselle Cranes.

widthpx
widthpx
Abies mariesii
Abies mariesii
- evidence here all fine. Suggest lose "by scientists" as obvious Victuallers (talk) 11:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
  • A note here: the statement is not referenced explicitly at the beginning, but the site rests in the second para of the lead (Puerto Ricos DANFS article)
  • Second note: "large cruiser" redirects to the Alaska-class article.
  • Third note: the class were officially designated as "large cruisers", but they were basically battlecruisers (which is referenced in the article)...would it be better to use "battlecruiser" in place of "large cruiser"?
  • Fourth note: a very similar hook for Puerto Ricos sister ship, Samoa, can be found in the October 20th section...if you want me to think of an alternate hook for one, I will. —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 02:58, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on October 20

  • ... that Valvata piscinalis (pictured), "European stream valvata", is nonindigeous and widely distributed in some areas in North America, has declined in some parts of its native distribution, and in some areas it is endangered? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by Snek01 (talk) 08:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
facial bones
facial bones
Self-nom. moved from userspace 10/20. delldot ∇. 21:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- all fine - suggest a picture? Victuallers (talk) 12:02, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Done Gary King (talk) 04:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
  • A note here: the statement is not referenced explicitly at the beginning, but the site rests in the second para of the lead (Samoas DANFS article)
  • Second note: "large cruiser" redirects to the Alaska-class article.
  • Third note: the class were officially designated as "large cruisers", but they were basically battlecruisers (which is referenced in the article)...would it be better to use "battlecruiser" in place of "large cruiser"? —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 21:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on October 19

- nice article about something clever. Pity no on line cites. Victuallers (talk) 22:09, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
...page numbers? —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 03:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Napoleon Diamond Necklace
Napoleon Diamond Necklace
Nice article, but is it's status downgraded? Status is a measure of threatenedness, and vulnerable is a step down in terms of danger from endangered. Sabine's Sunbird talk 19:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
I see what you are saying, but I am not sure what the appropriate term is, since "downgrade" can imply that its status "worsened". Maybe I should just say "revised". Rlendog (talk) 01:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Downlisted? I guess revised works too. Sabine's Sunbird talk 22:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Parikrama 2008
Parikrama 2008
  • ... that Mickey Rooney's 1964–1965 ABC series Mickey co-starred his second son, Tim, who died at the age of fifty-nine in 2006 on his surviving father's 86th birthday?--self-nom 03:05, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
OR
OR
OR

Articles created/expanded on October 18

  • Could you confirm that the bird's appearance facts are sourced with the bird Handbook ref? I'm figuring that the article is essentially based off that book, but I just wanted to make sure. Otherwise it looks good. Thanks, JamieS93 12:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment Nothing unusual about small planes crashing, which is why they generally fail WP:AIRCRASH. Mjroots (talk) 07:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Except this one was carrying relief aid. And the article isn't about the crash; it's about the quake. ~one of many editorofthewikis ~ 16:24, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
ALT:
... that the portraiture of Elizabeth I (pictured) contains complex iconography of empire and virginity that conveyed to Elizabethans the majesty and significance of the Virgin Queen? - PKM (talk) 19:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
ALT:... that NASA Astronaut Group 8, selected in January 1978, included NASA's first female astronauts? -MBK004 00:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
File:Akon2.jpg
Fixed Gary King (talk) 05:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Shay duplex
Shay duplex
Warehouse/stable
Warehouse/stable

Articles created/expanded on October 17

Altgeld Hall
Altgeld Hall
Alt hook: ... that in the first discovery of natural gas that led to the Indiana Gas Boom, the miners thought they had breached the ceiling of Hell and left the hole plugged for a decade? Image optional, Self Nom by Charles Edward 15:16, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
(alt hook)... that modern experts estimate that around 90% of the natural gas discovered in the Indiana Gas Boom was wasted in flambeau displays?--Gen. Bedford 00:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Brashlyan
Brashlyan
I assume that more specifically he joined the Royal Navy? David Underdown (talk) 09:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Yes. -- How do you turn this on (talk) 10:53, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Refs 1 and 5 say he joined the Royal Navy at age 11. --Bruce1ee 14:04, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

--new article by Dudemanfellabra and Parkwells (moved from sandbox upon its NHL designation announcement). doncram (talk) 05:54, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Date, length, ref. --maclean 05:52, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Date and length, hook and references verified. Oceanh (talk) 18:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC).
Too short (around 700 characters when 1500 characters are needed), no references in the article. Royalbroil 17:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on October 16

  • First hook ok, foreign language ref accepted in good faith. The "debated in Europe" part of the second hook is not present in the article. --Bruce1ee 06:44, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Self-nom. Sorry for the slightly longer hook - the length is mainly due to the fact that the article title is itself so long, and had to be piped. The actual displayed text is only 187 chars. Fut.Perf. 11:23, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

All ok, print refs. Link to feast added, and perhaps a "probably" should be added, as it is not certain the motet was written before the feast. But ok as it is. Johnbod (talk) 13:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Date, expansion, size and ref OK. Kablammo (talk) 01:17, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
A sunflower starfish is regenerating arms that were lost to predators
A sunflower starfish is regenerating arms that were lost to predators
Tide pools
Tide pools
He was a top diplomat? Not too sure about that. Otherwise, fine. -- How do you turn this on (talk) 15:02, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the query, and for reviewing the article. I wrote "top diplomat" simply on the assumption that a country's permanent representative to the UN is one of its most important diplomats. Van Lierop was the diplomat who voiced Vanuatu's position on international affairs throughout the 1980s. If that's not OK, though, it can be rephrased, of course. How about "one of Vanuatu's senior diplomats"? Or even "Vanuatu's Permanent Representative to the United Nations"? Aridd (talk) 18:25, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
I prefer the first one. -- How do you turn this on (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Fine by me. Does it get the yes tick, then? ;) Aridd (talk) 16:27, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
"Unwritten" Rule H1. Art LaPella (talk) 03:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Not in the slightest. But your apology for your misapprehension is accepted in advance. Aridd (talk) 09:25, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
??? Whatever. Art LaPella (talk) 06:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Make sure you reword the original hook for clarity. -- How do you turn this on (talk) 22:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks; done. Aridd (talk) 00:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
The Two Working Men in Cork
The Two Working Men in Cork
Your suggestion is fine by me. :bloodofox: (talk) 17:15, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

::not enough wikify--JackyCheung (talk) 09:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

I've split this article into sections, which is what I believe Jacky is referring to. I don't have access to the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, so source accepted in good faith. -- How do you turn this on (talk) 15:25, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
OK,now there is no problem.--JackyCheung (talk) 08:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
As I have pointed out at User talk:Ironholds#Copyright concerns, the original article created by Ironholds is basically a very thinly rewritten version of the ODNB entry (not a straight copy and paste, but the same facts, presented in pretty much the same order, often using the same or very similar words). Some additional sources have been added to verify particular points, but the text still essentially parallels the ODNB entry. There is some further discussion about some other recent articles by Ironholds here. -- Testing times (talk) 09:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Is the current article at all similar to the ODNB one? -- How do you turn this on (talk) 13:26, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
(example moved to talk page) -- How do you turn this on (talk) 13:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Due to plagiarism concerns, this article is now This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues not eligible. If the article is seriously reworked, it may have a chance to be. -- How do you turn this on (talk) 14:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
For the avoidance of any doubt, I am quite sure this was a good-faith attempt to write a new article based on the ODNB entry. The ODNB was clearly given as a reference, so plagiarism is not the issue really. My concern is that "based upon" in this case amounts to "very thin rewriting of" (not quite a cut and paste, but not very far away from that either). -- Testing times (talk) 14:04, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Looks good, though I don't think the picture should be used on the main page. -- How do you turn this on (talk) 15:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
From the BRIT Awards? Shouldn't it be at? Otherwise, ok. -- How do you turn this on (talk) 15:41, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Done Gary King (talk) 17:42, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
The article is fine, but this hook isn't particularly interesting, or catching imo. I'm not particularly creative, but I wonder if a better hook can be thought of? Best wishes, -- How do you turn this on (talk) 15:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
I'm very open to a better hook, I'm sometimes not very catchy. She was known as the "Poison lady" since she was the Poison Control Center's go to person for 40 years, so maybe there's something there? There's a claim she haunts her old lab but that's not much use, it's only cited in a student paper so I didn't even include it. Or how about that she got a honorary Doctorate from a University which was a rival to where she was already a professor, despite never having gone to college? The hook I gave stems from the chain of coincidences that started much of it... if her husband, who apparently wanted to be a camp DJ, hadn't failed his induction physical into the Canadian Army, they wouldn't have moved to the Bahamas, and if they hadn't moved to the Bahamas (and remembered to take the applicable parts of their Collectanea (a word they apparently coined or reused as it is very uncommon, try Google searching for it) with them) they never would have wrote the first book... which led to 9 more, 12 collaborations on other books, and over a hundred scientific papers... That is all inference, not sourced, but it's pretty obvious. It also won't fit in a hook. Ideas? She's a remarkable person and I could not BELIEVE we didn't have an article on her already! (Try running a google search on her name inside WP, it comes up a LOT, anything to do with tropical fruits seems to cite her work. ... I linked some just now using AWB but I only did a quarter of what I could have) ++Lar: t/c 17:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
How about something like: ... that Julia Morton, founder of the Morton Collectanea, prolific author and expert on the subject of medicinal and toxic plants, first garnered attention for writing Fifty Tropical Fruits of Nassau after her husband failed a Canadian military physical and they moved to the Bahamas at the start of WW II? Well, it sounded good in my head. And now, since Lar has made me look up the Morton Collectanaea, I may just have to see if there's enough source material to justify its own article. --InkSplotch (talk) 19:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Art will have your head for that hook, it's WAY over 200 chars :) I like it though! :) As for the Collectanea, I've written the University of Miami librarians to see if we can get a free license for this pic: which would be a good image for the lede of such an article. Say... did you know ... that the Morton Collectanea remained uncomputerized as late as 1996, relying on manual indexing and information retrieval? :) ++Lar: t/c 20:03, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Eeee..this is where I admit I don't even know the guidelines for a DYK hook. Alright then, we pare it waaaay down: ... that Julia Morton first gained attention for her work on medicinal and toxic plants after writing Fifty Tropical Fruits of Nassau, because her husband failed a military physical? --InkSplotch (talk) 22:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Fine, offline reference accepted in good faith. -- How do you turn this on (talk) 16:43, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
added that it's a bird. Johnbod (talk) 13:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Hate the new wording. How would ...did you know that the Bald Eagle bird is the national symbol of the United States? look? If you must state that it is a bird (and what is the harm in leaving some uncertainty, you are trying to pique curiosity) a less clumsy way of doing so must be possible. Sabine's Sunbird talk 05:07, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
OR *... that The Californians, a 1957–1959 NBC western, was set in San Francisco during the gold rush and vigilante days of the 1850s?--self-nom Billy Hathorn (talk) 04:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
OR *... that The Californians, a 1957–1959 NBC western drama, was particuarly known for its rich theme song, the work of Harry Warren and Harold Adamson?--self-nom Billy Hathorn (talk) 05:01, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on October 15

The Chernoznamentsy of Minsk, 1906
The Chernoznamentsy of Minsk, 1906
Is this funny enough for April Fool's Day DYK? I'm very interested with that hook! Royalbroil 19:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
It would actually be a cool April Fool's Day TFA! :-) –Juliancolton 00:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Haha! Indeed, very interesting, and now verified. – RyanCross (talk) 22:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Struck out and moved to April Fool's Day main DYK discussion so it can be featured then. PLEASE DO NOT RUN NOW. Royalbroil 04:26, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Length, reference and history (created afresh from redirect stub of former article) verified. Daniel Case (talk) 14:50, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on October 14

This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues 225 character hook. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, this was my "first draft" hook; I wrote a <200-character version, but I must have copied and pasted the wrong one. I'll try to remember what the condensed version was... Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 21:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
OK, from memory it was something like this:
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Can the hook fact be given an inline citation immediately after it in the text, please? (See the rules above) I can't find one at present. Date and length are both fine. Olaf Davis | Talk 10:29, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Refs now moved around to more appropriate places; a combination of refs 3/5/6 and 7 should do it, but pls let me know if more support is needed for the hook. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 11:53, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Article and image meet date and 5x expansion criteria, reference checks. Royalbroil 03:18, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Alternate hook: ... why the Capitol Loop, a state highway in Lansing, Michigan serving the State Capitol (pictured), was designated by the Michigan Department of Transportation? Same fact cited by the previously approved hook. Imzadi1979 (talk) 09:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


The article is marked as a stub, both in the main body and in the rating on the talk page, and thus is currently ineligible for a DYK listing. See Misplaced Pages:Did you know#DYK rules. Also, the article is currently too short, only 1091 characters in the narrative section (excluding the infobox and References), which is below the absolute 1500 charcter minimum. Nsk92 (talk) 04:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Length, history and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 14:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
ALT - that the Laughing Baby (pictured) opens with the Swedish text: "kan man ha roligare" which translates as "Can you have any more fun?"
(self nom) --Flewis 15:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
I nominated the image for deletion at Commons because I feel it is a fair use case and not free use. Royalbroil 14:58, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
I prefer the first version. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Following the Queen's recent visit to Google HQ, where she saw the video (and laughed), could we modify to the following? This has been cited in the article:
Length, history and reference verified. Although, can we get rid of "the laughing baby is one of the few internet memes that have entered popular culture" in the intro? When internet memes and viral videos have been parodied and alluded to on shows like Arrested Development, The Simpsons and Family Guy are often shown on TV news ("Bride Has Massive Hair Wig Out"), and as I type MSN.com has this story linked from its main page, that must either be the biggest "few" in the world or the person who wrote that either in the source in the article just woke up after falling into a coma back in 1994. Daniel Case (talk) 14:37, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Large but not quite 5x expansion: ~6KB to ~20KB so far. Ref verified via Spanish-language website. Converting the Landmarks para into prose and expanding it may be enough. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 11:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Expansion, creation history and ref check out in respect of both articles. Both hooks are <200 characters, so either is fine. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 11:44, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
File:26th North Carolina Infantry Band.jpg
How about:
The article just passed GA, so making it the lead hook might be a good idea; thus, I added a pic for the first hook.--Gen. Bedford 16:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
All three hooks verified AGF with offline sourcing. My personal favourite is the Alt 2. Length and creation date are fine. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 11:49, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
To preempt an obvious objection, the other two U.S. Navy four-star admirals who fathered four-star sons were either promoted to that rank posthumously or at retirement; neither served in that rank while on active duty. - Morinao (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
This point is referenced directly by offline ref , so that's fine. Length and creation history confirmed as well. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 11:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
No qualifying article. Art LaPella (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
No qualifying article. Art LaPella (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
oops Ryan shell (talk) 02:03, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Very slightly too short at the moment @ 1467 bytes. Ref, creation date and history verified. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 11:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Entrance to Window on the Plains Museum in Dumas, Texas
OR
Length, history and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on October 13

Length, creation history and ref verified. The hook wording could be a little clearer; perhaps "...that can include penalties excluding those who do not..." → "...that can exclude people who do not..." Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 12:31, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
The others weren't reported?--Wetman (talk) 15:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
You mean there were only three formed that year? --74.13.131.22 (talk) 16:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Please specify country. --74.13.131.22 (talk) 16:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
The correct spelling of the place is "Tahawus". This should probably be fixed before being accepted. Also, please resolve the merger issue with the already existing article at Tahawus, New York. --Polaron | Talk 16:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Will this be a 5X expansion after merge? --74.13.131.22 (talk) 21:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Halloween DYKs

See also: Misplaced Pages:Did you know/Halloween 2008

Note: We are "breaking the rules" (including the unwritten ones) these articles were prepared in under 5 days but are being delayed. (We are allowed to break the rules if we decide to do so.)

A pumpkin in Lake Pisaquid in 2008
A pumpkin in Lake Pisaquid in 2008
  • ... that the Windsor Pumpkin Regatta is a race featuring large hollowed out pumpkins in which contestants paddle a half mile course across a lake? The annual race is held in Windsor, Nova Scotia. self nom Verne Equinox (talk) 01:48, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
    • This is maybe short but is an excellent article for Halloween. If Verne Equinox and someone else (you?) agrees then can we just break the rules and move this back a week or more? Oh and I added a pic with an orange pumpkin which I think would be more eye catching. Victuallers (talk) 10:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
      • - I've been clearing articles toward the bottom (and the rest of you guys should too!) but I have to weigh in on this one.... the article newness and length are fine. The hook is in the article and there is adequate sourcing to support what it says (which in essence is that there is a race, it is held in place X, and uses equipment Y... normally that's rather ho num but not in this case!) even though it's not exactly sourced directly from the hook's sentence. So this article is all set. The added pic is awesome (although I like the other one in the article slightly better). I strongly support bending the rules a bit and putting this one up on 31 October if there is no compelling reason not to (other than rules) and meanwhile maybe people can expand it even further? I want to hear about the other classes, motor and experimental!... I'd also say if we can find other thematics, let's have at least one Halloween related article in each update on 31 October... what do you all think? (Maybe take that to WT:DYK... ) ++Lar: t/c 12:43, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
      • - Note...this article was from 13th Oct ... we're breaking the rules!! Victuallers (talk) 17:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
        • I had never thought about the Hallowe'en connection. I think its a great idea! Since your discussion, I have added 2 more images to Commons and changed the one on this page. It might suit the theme better .. The other one that I added is of a motorized competitor in response to one of the comments above. I really have no other information at the moment regarding the motorized class. The particular boat shown failed to make the finish line though - I think he got lost in a fog ... Verne Equinox (talk) 00:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: It can wait until Oct. 31, but it would be well past the five to seven day limit.Billy Hathorn (talk) 00:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC) Don't worry! You created it in less than 5. Its us who are late. Thx. Victuallers (talk) 08:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

See also

Category:
Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions Add topic