| Revision as of 14:42, 2 November 2008 editPcap (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,285 editsm Listing on WP:DELSORT under Transportation← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:52, 2 November 2008 edit undoSilkTork (talk | contribs)Administrators104,160 edits →Remote Indicating Systems: responseNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| *'''Keep''' - there are enough reliable to indicate there is the possibility that this could be built into a decent article. <span style="border: 1px #F10; background-color:cream;">''']''' *]</span> 14:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' - there are enough reliable to indicate there is the possibility that this could be built into a decent article. <span style="border: 1px #F10; background-color:cream;">''']''' *]</span> 14:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Hi SilkTork, could you name a single reliable source that provides non-trivial coverage? Are you suggesting the article should rely on sources from before 1945? ] (]) 14:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC) | ::Hi SilkTork, could you name a single reliable source that provides non-trivial coverage? Are you suggesting the article should rely on sources from before 1945? ] (]) 14:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::The date of the reliable source has never been an issue - we use Britannica 1911, though admittedly that's a problematic source. The dates of the books in that search vary and a good number are from the 1960s and 1970s. Doing a quick search by one of the trade names turned up this - and this - , and a search on the other turned up this - . That's enough to convince me that there's enough material out there to build this article when someone is interested or motivated enough. The system existed, has been written about by enough reliable sources to establish it's significance and notabilty, and forms part of the history of aviation. I can see someone coming upon the term and wishing to discover more - which is where we come in. <span style="border: 1px #F10; background-color:cream;">''']''' *]</span> 14:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] ] 14:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] ] 14:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)</small> | ||
Revision as of 14:52, 2 November 2008
Remote Indicating Systems
- Remote Indicating Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) –
Notability concerns - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 14:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - there are enough reliable sources to indicate there is the possibility that this could be built into a decent article. SilkTork * 14:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hi SilkTork, could you name a single reliable source that provides non-trivial coverage? Are you suggesting the article should rely on sources from before 1945? PhilKnight (talk) 14:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- The date of the reliable source has never been an issue - we use Britannica 1911, though admittedly that's a problematic source. The dates of the books in that search vary and a good number are from the 1960s and 1970s. Doing a quick search by one of the trade names turned up this - and this - , and a search on the other turned up this - . That's enough to convince me that there's enough material out there to build this article when someone is interested or motivated enough. The system existed, has been written about by enough reliable sources to establish it's significance and notabilty, and forms part of the history of aviation. I can see someone coming upon the term and wishing to discover more - which is where we come in. SilkTork * 14:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hi SilkTork, could you name a single reliable source that provides non-trivial coverage? Are you suggesting the article should rely on sources from before 1945? PhilKnight (talk) 14:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 14:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)