| Revision as of 14:11, 10 November 2008 editCapricorn42 (talk | contribs)Rollbackers63,117 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Gaidanchai.WP:TW | Revision as of 00:19, 11 November 2008 edit undoSilkTork (talk | contribs)Administrators104,160 edits →Gaidanchai: pause for thoughtNext edit → | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :{{la|Gaidanchai}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Gaidanchai}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| I'm not saying this is a ]. I just couldn't find many sources to consider this ] and ]. returns 4 results to Chinese blogs and the author has provided as a source. ] (]) 14:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC) | I'm not saying this is a ]. I just couldn't find many sources to consider this ] and ]. returns 4 results to Chinese blogs and the author has provided as a source. ] (]) 14:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - no assertion of notability and no reliable sources. By the article's description this appears to be the Cantonese word for pancake - though the only sources are 3 blogs. <s>Possible hoax. Possible speedy.</s> <span style="border: 1px #F10; background-color:cream;">''']''' *]</span> 00:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Doing a search on 雞蛋仔 returned , which gives this spelling: Gai daan jai which then returned , while this spelling Gai dan jai, returned . Now, I'm still not certain that this is a notable subject - the sources are mainly blogs - but this is not a hoax, and it's not a speedy. <span style="border: 1px #F10; background-color:cream;">''']''' *]</span> 00:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:19, 11 November 2008
Gaidanchai
- Gaidanchai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I'm not saying this is a hoax. I just couldn't find many sources to consider this verifiable and notable. Google returns 4 results to Chinese blogs and the author has provided this picture as a source. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 14:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - no assertion of notability and no reliable sources. By the article's description this appears to be the Cantonese word for pancake - though the only sources are 3 blogs.
Possible hoax. Possible speedy.SilkTork * 00:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Doing a search on 雞蛋仔 returned these results, which gives this spelling: Gai daan jai which then returned this, while this spelling Gai dan jai, returned this. Now, I'm still not certain that this is a notable subject - the sources are mainly blogs - but this is not a hoax, and it's not a speedy. SilkTork * 00:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)