Misplaced Pages

User talk:Date delinker: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:04, 14 November 2008 editOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,951 edits added← Previous edit Revision as of 05:03, 14 November 2008 edit undoOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,951 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock|unintentional sock puppet. Will be tagged with owner once block lifted. ] (]) 01:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)}}
:Are you the owner? And if so, you won't run the bot again until ], right? - ] (]) 01:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

:*I am the 'owner', and have been having an ongoing conversation with Luna by email on the matter. I am not running a bot, but using multi-windowed function of FF - please check the contributions which would demonstrate my editing pattern has none of the periodic pattern of bot edits. The account was newly set up three days ago so as not to interfere with my edit count, and I had omitted to properly tag that it belonged to me. ] (]) 03:01, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

<div class="user-block"> ] This account has been {{#ifeq:|yes|] indefinitely|{{#if:|''']''' for a period of '''{{{time}}}'''| ]}}}} from editing because it appears to be running a ] without ]. This is in violation of Misplaced Pages ]. All automated or semi-automated scripts must be approved by the ] to ensure that they are performing safe and useful functions, and are not abusing system resources. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|''']''' <sup>]</sup> 13:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-botblock --> <div class="user-block"> ] This account has been {{#ifeq:|yes|] indefinitely|{{#if:|''']''' for a period of '''{{{time}}}'''| ]}}}} from editing because it appears to be running a ] without ]. This is in violation of Misplaced Pages ]. All automated or semi-automated scripts must be approved by the ] to ensure that they are performing safe and useful functions, and are not abusing system resources. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|''']''' <sup>]</sup> 13:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-botblock -->


:I've checkusered this account, and am aware of the parent account's identity. In the interest of moving forward with a minimum of drama, I'm leaning ''against'' revealing that identity, but please do bear in mind that further socking will very likely change my mind on that count. &ndash; <span style="font-family: Garamond">] (])</span> 20:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC) :I've checkusered this account, and am aware of the parent account's identity. In the interest of moving forward with a minimum of drama, I'm leaning ''against'' revealing that identity, but please do bear in mind that further socking will very likely change my mind on that count. &ndash; <span style="font-family: Garamond">] (])</span> 20:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

{{unblock|unintentional sock puppet. Will be tagged with owner once block lifted. ] (]) 01:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)}}
:Are you the owner? And if so, you won't run the bot again until ], right? - ] (]) 01:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

:*I am the 'owner'. I am not running a bot, nor do I intend on ever running a bot. I use multi-windowed function of FF - please check the contributions which would demonstrate my editing pattern has none of the periodic pattern of bot edits. The account was newly set up three days ago so as not to interfere with my edit count, and I had omitted to properly tag that it belonged to me. ] (]) 03:01, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:03, 14 November 2008

This account has been blocked from editing because it appears to be running a bot script without approval. This is in violation of Misplaced Pages policy. All automated or semi-automated scripts must be approved by the Bot Approvals Group to ensure that they are performing safe and useful functions, and are not abusing system resources. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
I've checkusered this account, and am aware of the parent account's identity. In the interest of moving forward with a minimum of drama, I'm leaning against revealing that identity, but please do bear in mind that further socking will very likely change my mind on that count. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Date delinker (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

unintentional sock puppet. Will be tagged with owner once block lifted. Ohconfucius (talk) 01:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=unintentional sock puppet. Will be tagged with owner once block lifted. ] (]) 01:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=unintentional sock puppet. Will be tagged with owner once block lifted. ] (]) 01:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=unintentional sock puppet. Will be tagged with owner once block lifted. ] (]) 01:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Are you the owner? And if so, you won't run the bot again until it is approved by BAG, right? - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
  • I am the 'owner'. I am not running a bot, nor do I intend on ever running a bot. I use multi-windowed function of FF - please check the contributions which would demonstrate my editing pattern has none of the periodic pattern of bot edits. The account was newly set up three days ago so as not to interfere with my edit count, and I had omitted to properly tag that it belonged to me. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:01, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Category:
User talk:Date delinker: Difference between revisions Add topic