Misplaced Pages

User talk:Satanoid: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:07, 9 December 2008 editSatanoid (talk | contribs)691 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:22, 9 December 2008 edit undoVanished User 1004 (talk | contribs)24,859 edits Only warning: Page blanking, removal of content on Sikh Extremism. (TW)Next edit →
Line 44: Line 44:


I don't know how to contribute to it, they reject every source we bring, we are getting no where. And they check my userpage to see whatever you say to me, and then link each other to it, it's eerie. That's why I was trying to get you to confirm your e-mail, so I could e-mail you privately without our every word being scrutinized. I can't stand this, count me out of this article. Good luck, and please don't insult them or break rules, once you're banned that article may never make a return. --] 09:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC) I don't know how to contribute to it, they reject every source we bring, we are getting no where. And they check my userpage to see whatever you say to me, and then link each other to it, it's eerie. That's why I was trying to get you to confirm your e-mail, so I could e-mail you privately without our every word being scrutinized. I can't stand this, count me out of this article. Good luck, and please don't insult them or break rules, once you're banned that article may never make a return. --] 09:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. <br> The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Misplaced Pages{{#if:Sikh Extremism|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-delete4im --> ''Leave the flags in the article. Stop the personal attacks. Now.'' ] (]) 17:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:22, 9 December 2008

Sikh Extremism

Hi, I have had a lot of questions and comments on the subject matter of Sikh Extremism

Its wish to be deleted (by some) has been declined and will continue remain on Misplaced Pages.

If you want to discuss the subject matter please feel free to do so on the relevant discussion page.

As far as I am concerned, the issue of deletion is now closed.

Finally, I would like to thank all the admins who decided and voted to keep, and contributed to the article. Thank you. Satanoid (talk) 14:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Islam and Sikhism

Proselytizing of Muslims or the generally Misplaced Pages population? Because I've never heard of the former from the Sikhs, even in their history it has been a movement primarily but not exclusively made up of Hindu converts. Either way, the article is something we can improve together. --Enzuru 22:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

I am familiar with the dynastic and political aspects of Sikhism that you mentioned, in fact I recently visited Amritsar on my way to Pakistan, and got some interesting books there, though nothing special you couldn't get anywhere else. My father, who loves Guru Nanak, was upset to find out that the later Gurus turned it into a dynastic institution. He blames the Mughals for the militization of the faith, which is reasonable from the literature we read. --Enzuru 10:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Sikh Extremism

copied from User talk:Doug Hi Doug, thank you for your attention ref Sikh Extremism I would like to point out that admins Flewis and DJ Clayworth voted to keep the article along with many editors, and the final decision was not to delete. Unfortunately the article is continually subject to vandalism by user Sikh-History Satanoid (talk) 11:20, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

  • Hi, I have no idea what you are talking about. I did not participate in this debate. I closed an MFD that may have somehow been related. I am not sure what the relevance of the fact that certain votes were made by admins is, but you certainly seem to be going a bit overboard on this campaign against User:Sikh-History. If you are asking me to act against perceived vandalism, I will not. You have presented no evidence and if you continue to feel that some action is necessary you should be taking it to WP:AIV or some other appropriate forum. If you are asking for advice, on the other hand, then please WP:CHILL.  :-) Cheers!--Doug. 14:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pidhu The Great

A tag has been placed on Pidhu The Great requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial 21:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Uncivil remarks

Comment like this from you are hideous insults against another editor. It is an insult in the culture that the editor whom you called by the name comes from and most apparently yours too. Therefore, despite the fact how you choose to hide, ""Pidhu the great of Youtube" still remains an insult. Be WP:CIVIL in your comments and refrain from flaming on wikipedia. --RoadAhead 21:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey...Whats wrong with Pidhu The Great ? He seems like a nice friendly jolly chap to me ??? Incidentally if you think he's a good stand up comedian as I'm sure you do, I'd be more than happy to welcome you in contributing some info on this funny person, thanks Satanoid (talk) 21:36, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Verification

Please verify your e-mail address so I can contact you through Misplaced Pages. Go to my preferences and you can put it and save it there, and then verify it when the e-mail comes to you. --Enzuru 11:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. For cracking racist and religious jokes and calling other editor "extremist" RoadAhead 17:12, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

You are ignoring all wikiquette by continuously involving in personal attacks like calling other editors "extremists" once again here after you have been informed several times. --RoadAhead 06:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Since you have continued hurling personal attacks on other editors after repetitive warnings, I have reported you at ANI here.--RoadAhead 16:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Leave me out of Sikh Extremism

I don't know how to contribute to it, they reject every source we bring, we are getting no where. And they check my userpage to see whatever you say to me, and then link each other to it, it's eerie. That's why I was trying to get you to confirm your e-mail, so I could e-mail you privately without our every word being scrutinized. I can't stand this, count me out of this article. Good luck, and please don't insult them or break rules, once you're banned that article may never make a return. --Enzuru 09:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Sikh Extremism, you will be blocked from editing. Leave the flags in the article. Stop the personal attacks. Now. sinneed (talk) 17:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Satanoid: Difference between revisions Add topic