Misplaced Pages

U haz a sekrit admirererer

. Don't know who this guy is, but he sure has a thing for you! --Jayron32.talk.contribs 17:53, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... I wonder if my parents would fund a bewb job for me... I hadn't thought to ask... I doubt it, but that would be boss. O, but don't feed the trolls, Jayron, especially the stupid ones with weird fetishes. I mean, rape me with his foot long sub? That's just weird. لennavecia 19:26, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

You never did answer his question, either. – iridescent 19:30, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

ROFL. I never see this stuff. I don't have my own page watchlisted. Uhm... hahahaha... hold on, "blojobbbing" has to be the funniest looking non-word word I've seen in a long time. It looks like a snow sport, though... don't know why. O, but to answer the questions, uhm... no, more than you've got, yes, I thought it was already established that I'm a lady of the night? Sigh, he can't keep up with his own conversations. Sad, really. That reminds me, I have to go turn on my crimson porch light. لennavecia 19:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

And by the way, this was not necessarily vandalism... ;) Haaaay-eee! لennavecia 19:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Holy shit. I was clicking back and I hit the edit where Jay protected my page for excessive vandalism, so I hit the history tab and BLADOW! A whole page of vandalism and reverts! Hahahaha, that's hilarious. I had no idea. لennavecia 19:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

It's worse for girls. I assume most vandals are guys. So they vandalize, get reverted, go to the userpage of the user who warned them, and if it's a guy sometimes they ignore, sometimes they say "fuck you", or something similar. When the person who reverted them is a girl, their "Internet male"-ness kicks in and they are compelled by their subconscious instincts to either show off by being all "macho" and vandalizing, or they talk about sex. J.delanoy_adds 19:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't think that's just vandals; you just summed up the way Misplaced Pages talkpages work. – iridescent 20:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

(ec) Thanks for the Psychoanalysis, Dr. Delanoy. Hahaha... you're probably right, though. And it's quite amusing if you look through the IP vandalism, there's one that talks about women being inferior to men, about how women are stupid, blah blah, whatever. And there's one that says I should get a life. The irony is great... I've got male vandals that probably can't spell their own name right, telling me that women are stupid and I need to get a life, meanwhile, they're spending their time vandalizing an encyclopedia and showing signs of an inferiority complex by exaggerating the size of their presumably unimpressive member. لennavecia 20:10, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

To pile on the irony still further, looking at the last fifty edits to your user page only one vandalism lasted more than ten minutes and on average they were reverted within two minutes; and usually by blokes without you even needing to know it happened. I wonder whose page gets cleaned quicker, yours or Jimbo's?... ϢereSpielChequers 00:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Good question. I checked. His. Vandalism usually gets reverted in a minute or less on his talk user page. The longest standing vandalism that I noted was four minutes with one exception. Someone added, as if it were Jimbo's words referring to the community, "I love you guys." That stood for 44 minutes. Still, it's good to know that my page has been vandalized a couple dozen times in the past couple of weeks or so, and I had no idea. :D لennavecia 00:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm 44 minutes. May I have your permission to do the obvious experiment? ϢereSpielChequers 01:05, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha. لennavecia 01:27, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Voting

I do not repond positively to threats on my talk page from ST47 or anyone else. Why should I? I was told by an admin that I could place my votes on the ballot, understanding they will not be counted. There was discussion and agreement about this on the Elections talk page before it was done. You can check. NOBODY told me to mark them in any particular manner, so I copied what I found in the ballot.

According to ST47, it appears almost anybody but me can say almost anything they choose, no matter how offensive, on the ballot. I have been an active contributor to Misplaced Pages and to the Elections talk page. You can check. So far I have found mostly hostility and incivility here, despite my considerable efforts. The only exceptions are a Barn Star, three editors and two admins since I started here in late September. Is this how civility is encouraged in Misplaced Pages? Surely there must be some standard of reasonableness here? Mervyn Emrys (talk) 20:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you're upset with me. I just clarified something for Elonka. You're not eligible to vote. You realize this, correct? Elonka told you to make your opinions know anyway, knowing that they won't count toward to vote, and your previous votes have been indented by changing the # to #:. This leaves your comment while removing it from the count. You understand that, correct? Assuming all those things are understood, why then do you continue to make your comments using a # when you know that includes the vote in the count, alerts admins that you are not eligible, and then forces those admins to stop what they are doing to go indent your vote, when all this is avoided by you simply placing the : after the # as you have been requested?

I don't think it's a matter of incivility. ST47, from what I read on your page, was very civil in his requests, which you have apparently ignored. I also see no hostility, rather frustration. It's really as simple as just putting a colon after the pound sign. Please do that for future votes and you'll encounter no more issues. لennavecia 20:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Please look at the statement above: "NOBODY told me to mark them in any particular manner" before those votes were posted, which was some time ago, if you look.

Please see comments of UltraExactzz on Eligibility at ACE2008. This is nothing to threaten anybody about. ST47 was aware of the discussion about my eligibility BEFORE he made his recent threatening post on my talk page, because ST47 participated in those discussions. I'm getting a bit tired of having people jump on me for doing what I was told to do here, and for not doing what I was not told to do. I'm not stupid, and don't much care for being lectured to as if I am. See my user page. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't think you're stupid, and didn't intend to give such an impression. I'm discussing the matter with Elonka now to get a better understanding of what's going on. لennavecia 20:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

My apologies. Having gotten some of the back story, I realize you've had a rough ride here at Misplaced Pages so far. Personally, I think you should be eligible to vote considering the combined edit counts of your two accounts and your reason for having had to create a second account to begin with. Again, my apologies for adding to your stress. لennavecia 22:04, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry I snapped at you. Please accept my sincere apology (I grovel in mortification...). I assume you were only trying to be of some assistance, and I appreciate that. I offer no excuse, because there is none, but if you wish to see reasons, just look at the current RfC for Talk:Law, or the recent RfC on SlrubensteinII, both of which affected me greatly. Things seem to have a way of snow-balling in Misplaced Pages. Again, I hope you will find a way to forgive my transgression. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 00:33, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Seriously, I understand. No need to apologize to me. Let me know if you need anything. It would be my pleasure to help out any way I can. لennavecia 00:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

False edits and accusations

What a moron. I came back to sign the page on that sillyrabbit guy's talk page the same minute cause I forgot to, that is NOT vandalism. Get a life girl man Ill go out with you if you stop threatening people without basis yo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfvace (talk • contribs) 04:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

O, I can has date?! \o/ لennavecia 04:24, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

¿Qué se dijo? J.delanoy_adds 04:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

¿El quiere a chicas mudas? لennavecia 04:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

I meant, the men have to be.... men. J.delanoy_adds 04:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

If you made that edit technically you can't block me for personal attacks because I would be stating a fact ;)So if I made a bogus deletion and called it vandalism, YOU could be blocked for "name calling"? Wtf? I knew editors had too much power and abused it on here but come on. You should block whoever hacked your account to make that edit (or was it you?)

Thanks for taking my offer seriously. If it were serious I'd probably first ask for info and exchange myspace profiles or something. Hopefully your reply is a joke and not vanity. By the way what's with all those Q date posts in various langauges on this same talk page?? Take care Sfvace (talk) 06:30, 11 December 2008 (UTC)