| Revision as of 10:39, 5 March 2009 editTycoon24 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,169 edits →RE: SEC Subpoena← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:05, 5 March 2009 edit undoTycoon24 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,169 edits →RE: SEC SubpoenaNext edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| Then add your sentence to the ] or ] article. The problem is that it doesn't belong in the Jim Cramer biography article. It has nothing to do with him. Unless your article somehow references that the very reason the SEC changed the rule was because of Jim Cramer, then by adding it to Jim Cramer's biography you are creating a libelous perception that he is the cause of the rule change. Your article doesn't state that as a reason, so it belongs elsewhere. Not in Jim Cramer's biography. ] (]) 10:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | Then add your sentence to the ] or ] article. The problem is that it doesn't belong in the Jim Cramer biography article. It has nothing to do with him. Unless your article somehow references that the very reason the SEC changed the rule was because of Jim Cramer, then by adding it to Jim Cramer's biography you are creating a libelous perception that he is the cause of the rule change. Your article doesn't state that as a reason, so it belongs elsewhere. Not in Jim Cramer's biography. ] (]) 10:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Matt, I didn't create any perception that the SEC changed their position at least in part because of Cramer's actions. Like you said, we can only use sources that are associated with the person. This is especially true (and more strict) when editing a live person's biography. You should know this. The only available source that uses Jim Cramer's name in association with the SEC Subpoena is the one that is currently on Jim Cramer's page. If I (or you) were to add more information regarding the SEC subpoena onto Jim Cramer's biography article, it is creating a perception that Jim Cramer is somehow in a conspiracy with the SEC's actions to drop the charges. Jim Cramer's biography is not a place for conspiracy theorists. Unless there is evidence from reputable sources that Jim Cramer is a part of the SEC's actions, it doesn't belong there. If you want to add the SEC information to Misplaced Pages, add it to the ] article or the ] page. ] (]) 20:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:05, 5 March 2009
If you leave a message here, I will respond on your talk page. Please respond to my messages on my talk page as well.
 Archives |
Diabetes Mellitus
Sorry It wont happen again I have seen what was wrong with my copyright and admit that the lisencing was incorrect. sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctor Incarnate6 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
- Hi Matt, I just wanted to say thank you very much for giving me the barnstar. It was a very nice gesture. Cheers :-)) Marek.69 20:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- My pleasure. :-) Matt (talk) 20:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
External link
I did not add new external link, it was the same link but moved, see links and - which are moved links. Doorvery far (talk) 03:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Crown Point, Indiana
hey unless you live in crown point, i really don't see how you can tell who is or is not a notable person —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrick kvachkoff (talk • contribs) 04:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated you for adminship
Neutralle would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Neutralle to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Mikaey . If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.Nissan 350Z
why would you delete that usefull info i put on the 350z? this is all true. are you made because the 350z is faster than your car? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.1.64 (talk) 07:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
The Caine Mutiny
Hi Matt, I did intend to make a constructive edit, and still think I did--I thought the previous version of what was revealed about Lt. Keefer's character was original research-like as well as possibly untrue, therefore we shouldn't say one way or another about it.(who knows, it's a novel). Unless there is some major critic's opinion or Wouk's hmself, published somewhere, in support of the pprevious version, then I prefer my version. Best wishes, Richard L. Peterson75.45.122.222 (talk) 04:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Rich (talk) 04:48, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- I myself don't know much about wine, and didn't know yellow wine existed, but that's what they had in the novel. Best wishes75.45.122.222 (talk) 04:52, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
RE: Crown Point
I know, I was just dicking around with my friend, and then I bitched at you cause I enjoy pissing people off. I mean come on though, you couldn't have just left it? My family really is a pretty prominent family in crown point. It was kind of just a joke that only crown point citizens would get. It's not like anyone goes around looking up crown point anyway. Except for I guess you. What drew your attention to that article anyway? Do you have a little random town fetish? :D
RE: SEC Subpoena
- Hey, Matt, you're not a machine, you are allowed to respond to me like a human. Instead of repeating what you've already told me, you can say "thanks" since I pointed out the broken link that was re-added to the SEC subpoena section. I simply re-edited the section to take out the broken link you (or whomever) added. If I went over the three-revert rule in order to fix what was broken - I apologize. But stop adding the broken link if that's you. It's no longer funny. Thanks. Tycoon24 (talk) 09:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Matt, there is absolutely nothing in the article link that you added to the SEC subpoena section that mentions Jim Cramer. My removal of that link is justified for that reason. Your source is not only irrelevant, but it doesn't belong in Jim Cramer's biography. This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, I will report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. Thanks. Tycoon24 (talk) 09:42, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Then add your sentence to the SEC or Christopher Cox article. The problem is that it doesn't belong in the Jim Cramer biography article. It has nothing to do with him. Unless your article somehow references that the very reason the SEC changed the rule was because of Jim Cramer, then by adding it to Jim Cramer's biography you are creating a libelous perception that he is the cause of the rule change. Your article doesn't state that as a reason, so it belongs elsewhere. Not in Jim Cramer's biography. Tycoon24 (talk) 10:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Matt, I didn't create any perception that the SEC changed their position at least in part because of Cramer's actions. Like you said, we can only use sources that are associated with the person. This is especially true (and more strict) when editing a live person's biography. You should know this. The only available source that uses Jim Cramer's name in association with the SEC Subpoena is the one that is currently on Jim Cramer's page. If I (or you) were to add more information regarding the SEC subpoena onto Jim Cramer's biography article, it is creating a perception that Jim Cramer is somehow in a conspiracy with the SEC's actions to drop the charges. Jim Cramer's biography is not a place for conspiracy theorists. Unless there is evidence from reputable sources that Jim Cramer is a part of the SEC's actions, it doesn't belong there. If you want to add the SEC information to Misplaced Pages, add it to the Christopher Cox article or the SEC page. Tycoon24 (talk) 20:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)