| Revision as of 15:05, 25 March 2009 editSamllaws300 (talk | contribs)58 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:11, 25 March 2009 edit undoAvraham (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators49,247 edits Even if true we treat meats as socksNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :Note - Checkuser confirms that this is Sunholm. -- ] (]) 15:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | :Note - Checkuser confirms that this is Sunholm. -- ] (]) 15:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| I'm actually ]/] if you must know, '''not Sunholm'''. I've been ] with Sunholm, so not every account you think is him, really is. There, admitted it... --] (]) 15:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | I'm actually ]/] if you must know, '''not Sunholm'''. I've been ] with Sunholm, so not every account you think is him, really is. There, admitted it... --] (]) 15:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :Please see ]. Even if true, and ExHomey has not edited recently under that account, so it is hard to tell, meatpuppets are treated as sockpuppets and checkuser confirms Sunholm, Litherlandsand, Moorstone, yourself, etc. -- ] (]) 15:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:11, 25 March 2009
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Ex-Homey (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Please use this link to create the category page
(The page will be pre-loaded. All you need to do is save it)
Samllaws300 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
See below.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=See below. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=See below. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=See below. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Note - Checkuser confirms that this is Sunholm. -- Avi (talk) 15:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm actually User:Ex-Homey/User:ExHomey if you must know, not Sunholm. I've been tag-teaming with Sunholm, so not every account you think is him, really is. There, admitted it... --Samllaws300 (talk) 15:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Please see WP:SOCK. Even if true, and ExHomey has not edited recently under that account, so it is hard to tell, meatpuppets are treated as sockpuppets and checkuser confirms Sunholm, Litherlandsand, Moorstone, yourself, etc. -- Avi (talk) 15:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)