Misplaced Pages

User talk:IIIIIIIIIIP-OIIIIIIIIII: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:50, 15 May 2009 editIIIIIIIIIIP-OIIIIIIIIII (talk | contribs)33 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:01, 15 May 2009 edit undoAthanasius1 (talk | contribs)833 edits Blog Link: resp at WP:EARNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:





Line 21: Line 20:
And you still havent answered the question. Thank you very much for you false accusations and the nonchalance in not taking responsability for the false accusations. Can you see the question? And you still havent answered the question. Thank you very much for you false accusations and the nonchalance in not taking responsability for the false accusations. Can you see the question?
] (]) 16:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC) ] (]) 16:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

:As per earlier comment, at ]. '''] • '']'' ''' 17:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:01, 15 May 2009


Welcome

Greetings...

Hello, IIIIIIIIIIP-OIIIIIIIIII, and welcome to Misplaced Pages!

To get started, click on the green welcome.
I hope you like it here and decide to stay!
MBisanz
Happy editing! MBisanz 04:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Blog Link

Thank you for your note on my talk page. I removed the link in question because it does not appear to meet the standards of wikipedia's policy about self-published sources: self-published media, whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, Internet forum postings, tweets etc., are largely not acceptable. While I hope you will re-consider your assesment of my edit as vandalism, I have not reverted your re-insertion of the link. As a general rule, I try to avoid reverting good-faith edits by others whenever possible. Instead, I have asked for input from others about the viability of using your blog as a source, here. If you would like to continue this conversation, please do so on that page. Thanks, and happy editing. AthanasiusQuicumque vult 15:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


The questions was why you did come with the false accusations. "someone apparently tagged their blog onto a bunch of existing refs" And you still havent answered the question. Thank you very much for you false accusations and the nonchalance in not taking responsability for the false accusations. Can you see the question? IIIIIIIIIIP-OIIIIIIIIII (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

As per earlier comment, responded at Requests for editor assistance. AthanasiusQuicumque vult 17:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
User talk:IIIIIIIIIIP-OIIIIIIIIII: Difference between revisions Add topic