| Revision as of 03:21, 19 May 2009 edit69.238.165.217 (talk) →Clint Catalyst← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:52, 19 May 2009 edit undoRicky81682 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users161,010 edits →Clint CatalystNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| ] (]) 03:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | ] (]) 03:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| : First, see ]. Second, see ]. Third, I don't know why, but I also have an issue with that group of LA artists if it looks like they are bringing in friends, editors, and the like to make their articles into basically MySpace pages. Regardless of his attitude, for the most part, he's right on policy grounds, and it would be nice if people would discuss that instead of personal attacks, on both sides. Fourth, as to the source, a one-line mention isn't that much, and please don't describe it as a "certain LA movement...brought together an eclectic group of of artists, musicians, models, and photographers in LA." I know you don't edit outside of a very small set of articles, but in the grand scheme of the entire encyclopedia, a single wedding done in Los Angeles is not notable or significant (and his speech is not either), and this is from a guy who lives in LA and knows the scene. Not being a jerk here, but all those articles are full of people who discuss these individuals in such grandiose terms which looks completely nonsensical and frankly ridiculous to people who edit in the full encyclopedia. Look at my talk page alone, the last few articles I was working on include ], ], ]. I think that's clear why some people have issues with these articles when fans seem intend of ignoring policies which govern 2 million articles and berating everyone who doesn't agree why these people are so special. -- ] (]) 03:52, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:52, 19 May 2009
Yesterday you removed images from Kyle_Justin claiming they were improperly used fair use images. The images were GFDL-licensed, and the license was granted by a person you have been in conflict with. You provided no basis for concluding the license was invalid. Your edits were vandalism, and any repetition would be grounds for blocking. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:04, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello
Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Intuitive guide to Misplaced Pages
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (69.238.165.217) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!
Hi! :) I like the contributions you have been making and I want to invite you:
|
Hello 69.238.165.217! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to feminism. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Feminism, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles dealing with feminism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Feminism page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". Thanks! |
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Womanpower_logo.svg){kind=link}
--Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 04:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Clint Catalyst
Why would you add this when (1) mere attendance at a wedding is at best trivial and not important and (2) based on a source that doesn't mention him at all? I've removed it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
"There was a pause in the action for speeches from the best man, maid of honor and author Clint Catalyst, who waxed lyrical. ("Jessicka and Christian's union is an integral part of an ancient umbilical cord, connecting multi-talented musicians to visual artists to writers to performers to designers, in a symbiotic relationship that academics of future days will pigeonhole as a 'movement. . ." That quote is on the last page.
He didn't just attend, he gave a speech about a certain LA movement that was gathered. Even though there's an obvious bias here, the wedding in question was an event that brought together an eclectic group of of artists, musicians, models, and photographers in LA. It's definitely worth a mention in my opinion.
And no matter how much everybody wants me to be, I am NOT Xtian1313.
I just logged into a computer here that he had not logged out of. Doesn't matter I am not him. Nor am I his wife. I'd like to log in as an actual user but I fear that the articles I have the most knowledge about, I won't be allowed to edit. I am trying to help articles not blank sections because I have some bias against them. Look at my history you'll see I am trying to be helpful.
- Also this place is supposed to be for everybody. All I am doing is trying to set the record straight. I find articles. I add references. I don't understand why what I do isn't constructive and what users like Hullaballoo Wolfowitz does is not destructive?
Why are is he attacking a certain group of LA artists' pages over and over? Why is that ok? Basically, I want help. Not just another admin siding with somebody because they know more about wiki then I do about wiki policy.
69.238.165.217 (talk) 03:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- First, see WP:OUTING. Second, see Misplaced Pages:AN#COI_User:Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz. Third, I don't know why, but I also have an issue with that group of LA artists if it looks like they are bringing in friends, editors, and the like to make their articles into basically MySpace pages. Regardless of his attitude, for the most part, he's right on policy grounds, and it would be nice if people would discuss that instead of personal attacks, on both sides. Fourth, as to the source, a one-line mention isn't that much, and please don't describe it as a "certain LA movement...brought together an eclectic group of of artists, musicians, models, and photographers in LA." I know you don't edit outside of a very small set of articles, but in the grand scheme of the entire encyclopedia, a single wedding done in Los Angeles is not notable or significant (and his speech is not either), and this is from a guy who lives in LA and knows the scene. Not being a jerk here, but all those articles are full of people who discuss these individuals in such grandiose terms which looks completely nonsensical and frankly ridiculous to people who edit in the full encyclopedia. Look at my talk page alone, the last few articles I was working on include Rachel Corrie, ǀXam and ǂKhomani heartland, Judicial corporal punishment. I think that's clear why some people have issues with these articles when fans seem intend of ignoring policies which govern 2 million articles and berating everyone who doesn't agree why these people are so special. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:52, 19 May 2009 (UTC)