| Revision as of 18:42, 29 May 2009 editArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators46,424 edits →Li Yong (Tang Dynasty): Interim reply.← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:24, 30 May 2009 edit undoIce Cold Beer (talk | contribs)5,759 edits →Arbitration request regarding Wowest: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| ::Because if the discussion is just gone, the editors who commented there have to repeat raising the same topic and concerns. Even after Awadewit rejected the request, the discussion between her and others was still going on, and raised various ideas and discussed about where to move the discussion. If you need some agreement from involved editors as to this request, I will ask their opinion that. If they think my request is unnecessary, I would not ask you further on this.--] 17:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | ::Because if the discussion is just gone, the editors who commented there have to repeat raising the same topic and concerns. Even after Awadewit rejected the request, the discussion between her and others was still going on, and raised various ideas and discussed about where to move the discussion. If you need some agreement from involved editors as to this request, I will ask their opinion that. If they think my request is unnecessary, I would not ask you further on this.--] 17:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::: I'm heading out presently and will probably be unable to edit until tomorrow, so I'll look at it then. Thanks for your patience, ] 18:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | ::: I'm heading out presently and will probably be unable to edit until tomorrow, so I'll look at it then. Thanks for your patience, ] 18:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Arbitration request regarding Wowest == | |||
| I am notifying you of this thread per your request. Thanks, ] (]) 03:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:24, 30 May 2009
|
"For the dancers to appear at once ridiculous – stop up our ears to the sound of music, in a room where people are dancing."
This is the user talk page for AGK. You can also send this user an internal email. I have taken 68,260 actions on Misplaced Pages: 54,362 edits, 3,301 deletions, 2,661 blocks, and 7,936 protections. You are welcome to reverse any of them, except if my reason mentioned "checkuser", "arbitration", or "oversight". |
Misplaced Pages Signpost: 25 May 2009
- License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
- News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
- Misplaced Pages in the news: Misplaced Pages: threat or menace?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Li Yong (Tang Dynasty)
Hi, AGK, I saw you delete the meditation pages, but could you temporarily restore the pages? Because an editor rejected to proceed it via the mean of Mediation because s/he thought the matter can be dealt on the RS board or elsewhere. But unfortunately the discussion was halted for Nlu's inactiveness and Mattisse' ArbCom, but the discussion there is very valuable. That is not just a matter of DYK featuring but also whether ancient Chinese sources should be labeled as "primary sources" or "secondary sources". I want to copy-and paste the discussion to the talk page of Li Yong (Tang Dynasty) if you allow me to do so. Thanks.--Caspian blue 17:02, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- The rejected cases are indexed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Rejected/41. As for the talk pages, I'm uncomfortable releasing formal mediation proceedings without information as to specifically why access to them is desired; I'd therefore ask that you be more specific as to why you'd like the mediation's talk page restored. AGK 17:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Because if the discussion is just gone, the editors who commented there have to repeat raising the same topic and concerns. Even after Awadewit rejected the request, the discussion between her and others was still going on, and raised various ideas and discussed about where to move the discussion. If you need some agreement from involved editors as to this request, I will ask their opinion that. If they think my request is unnecessary, I would not ask you further on this.--Caspian blue 17:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm heading out presently and will probably be unable to edit until tomorrow, so I'll look at it then. Thanks for your patience, AGK 18:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Because if the discussion is just gone, the editors who commented there have to repeat raising the same topic and concerns. Even after Awadewit rejected the request, the discussion between her and others was still going on, and raised various ideas and discussed about where to move the discussion. If you need some agreement from involved editors as to this request, I will ask their opinion that. If they think my request is unnecessary, I would not ask you further on this.--Caspian blue 17:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration request regarding Wowest
I am notifying you of this thread per your request. Thanks, Ice Cold Beer (talk) 03:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC)