Revision as of 17:53, 19 June 2009 editDario D. (talk | contribs)617 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:17, 20 June 2009 edit undoJohn Vandenberg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users68,507 edits →some ideas: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
This is a test. | This is a test. | ||
== some ideas == | |||
I can understand your desire to draw attention to a product fault. If it was widely reported as a major fault, it could be added to the ] but that doesnt seem to be the case here, and the ] page isnt about a single product. My suggestion is to completely rethink your strategy: ignore the iPhone articles for the moment, continue to work on ] as a background task, and find other vectors to improve how readers can find this information. Here are some ideas that have come to me quickly. | |||
* ] - ] is a better venue to highlight specific issues. | |||
* {{tl|Infobox Information appliance}} - Articles about films have ratings; is there an opportunity to bring the same to products? Find other topical areas which have ratings in the infoboxes, and create ] ? | |||
* ] - comparison articles are intended to help the reader evaluate differing products. | |||
* ] - maybe there is room for a ]. | |||
Enjoy, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 03:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:17, 20 June 2009
purge server cache | edit count | edit summary usage
This is the Dario D. talk page. Click "new section", above, to post something.
Test SectionThis is a test. some ideasI can understand your desire to draw attention to a product fault. If it was widely reported as a major fault, it could be added to the WP:LEAD but that doesnt seem to be the case here, and the iPhone page isnt about a single product. My suggestion is to completely rethink your strategy: ignore the iPhone articles for the moment, continue to work on WP:CRIT as a background task, and find other vectors to improve how readers can find this information. Here are some ideas that have come to me quickly.
|