Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wolfkeeper: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:09, 27 June 2009 editWDGraham (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,201 edits Rocket FAC: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 23:22, 27 June 2009 edit undoWolfkeeper (talk | contribs)31,832 edits Rocket FACNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:


Please can you not strike my comments. ''I'' will decide when the issues that I have raised have been addressed. --''''']]'''''] 23:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC) Please can you not strike my comments. ''I'' will decide when the issues that I have raised have been addressed. --''''']]'''''] 23:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

:Please can you not remove my strikes as it's a waste of my, and your time. If you wish to unstrike things you feel have not been adequately addressed, then that's fine.- (]) '''Wolfkeeper''' (]) 23:22, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:22, 27 June 2009

Template:Werdnabot

Click here to leave a new message

Hohmann Launch Windows

I notice you've participated in an article on Launch Windows. I'm hoping you'll regard http://www.clowder.net/hop/railroad/sched.html a useful resource. It gives departure and arrival dates from/to various planets. The page also allows download of the spreadsheet used to make the schedule. http://www.clowder.net/hop/railroad/Hohmann.xls User can type in destination and departure planets, periapsis and apoapsis of departure & arrival orbits. Spreadsheet returns launch windows, trip time, arrival time, and delta vees


Regards,

Hop David —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.52.34.250 (talk) 23:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Concorde

Thanks for your efforts in re-organising this.

However please remember to use an edit summary, especially on the last edit of the batch. As it was (from a watchlist) it looked all too much like the ubiquitous section-deletion vandals blanking a section and it then needs hunting through the edit history to see that it isn't. The vandals have time to burn, the people trying to stop them don't. Thanks. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Rocket FAC

Please can you not strike my comments. I will decide when the issues that I have raised have been addressed. --GW 23:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Please can you not remove my strikes as it's a waste of my, and your time. If you wish to unstrike things you feel have not been adequately addressed, then that's fine.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 23:22, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
User talk:Wolfkeeper: Difference between revisions Add topic