| Revision as of 03:28, 16 July 2009 editEdison (talk | contribs)Administrators53,898 editsm Reverted 1 edit by Erzebetsmith identified as vandalism to last revision by MiszaBot III. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:59, 16 July 2009 edit undoDrawn Some (talk | contribs)5,968 edits →Proposed deletion of Blue Ghost TunnelNext edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 23:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC) | Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 23:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :Note: I did not create or expand subject article. ] (]) 04:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | :Note: I did not create or expand subject article. ] (]) 04:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==Your opinion wanted== | |||
| Hi, Edison, I respect your opinion and I see you commented on a couple of AfDs for genealogical entries. They are related to this page: ]. I am not sure whether or not it would be appropriate to nominate it for deletion. The entries on a list don't have to be notable, but if neither the list itself nor any of the members of the list are notable, what then? Only one of the entries has any information asserting significance and the source doesn't appear reliable. Thanks. ] (]) 03:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:59, 16 July 2009
 Archives |
|
● Archive 1: 8 May 2006-31 Dec 2006
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
RfC Invitation
Within the past month or so, you appear to have commented on at least one AN/I, RS/N, or BLP/N thread involving the use of the term "Saint Pancake" in the Rachel Corrie article. As of May 24th, 2009, an RfC has been open at Talk:Rachel_Corrie#Request_for_Comments_on_the_inclusion_of_Saint_Pancake for over a week. As editors who have previously commented on at least one aspect of the dispute, your further participation is welcome and encouraged. Jclemens (talk) 23:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
William Parente
Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/William Parente (2nd nomination). Thank you. Alchaenist (talk) 19:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})}
Misplaced Pages Signpost: 6 July 2009
- News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
- Misplaced Pages in the news: Misplaced Pages and kidnapping, new comedy series
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Madame Ngô Đình Nhu a gunslinging Dragon Lady?
Good man. ;) Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 02:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Dragon Lady was from Terry and the Pirates, not to be confused with a hotty first lady. Edison (talk) 13:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Blue Ghost Tunnel
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Blue Ghost Tunnel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Article's subject is identical with an existing entry in the encyclopedia. See Merritton Tunnel. This article is unreferenced and redundant, in fact, a redirect already exists to the Merritton Tunnel article.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Deconstructhis (talk) 23:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I did not create or expand subject article. Edison (talk) 04:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Your opinion wanted
Hi, Edison, I respect your opinion and I see you commented on a couple of AfDs for genealogical entries. They are related to this page: List_of_New_Jersey_military_officers_in_the_American_Revolution. I am not sure whether or not it would be appropriate to nominate it for deletion. The entries on a list don't have to be notable, but if neither the list itself nor any of the members of the list are notable, what then? Only one of the entries has any information asserting significance and the source doesn't appear reliable. Thanks. Drawn Some (talk) 03:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)