Revision as of 00:25, 25 July 2009 editCaldorwards4 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers57,055 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:30, 25 July 2009 edit undoJeandré du Toit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers18,693 editsm →Today (Gary Allan song): clNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Since it charted, it should be kept, as said above. I know for sure that it won't be a failure. However, a redirect might be fine. ] (]) 23:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | * Since it charted, it should be kept, as said above. I know for sure that it won't be a failure. However, a redirect might be fine. ] (]) 23:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
* '''Keep''' per TenPoundHammer - charted, referenced, and not a stub ] (]) 23:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | * '''Keep''' per TenPoundHammer - charted, referenced, and not a stub ] (]) 23:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
*''']''': "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation." The 2 new refs are also blogs, one of which doesn't even have a copy editor to fix spelling mistakes. The genre chart is not referenced, and there's no mention of a major chart. -- ] (]), 2009-07-25t15:29z |
Revision as of 15:30, 25 July 2009
Today (Gary Allan song)
- Today (Gary Allan song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails wp:music: the only source is a wordpress blog. There's nothing at . -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-07-22t11:38z 11:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect until it gets higher on the charts or Keep and yes this article meets WP:MUSIC by charting on a major chart (Billboard). --Caldorwards4 (talk)
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Meets the notability criteria for songs, as it's charted on a major chart, and has been reviewed by The 9513 and Roughstock, both of which are considered reliable as well. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 16:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Charted, has reliable sources, don't see any problem with it. Rlendog (talk) 19:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Since it charted, it should be kept, as said above. I know for sure that it won't be a failure. However, a redirect might be fine. Ryanbstevens (talk) 23:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per TenPoundHammer - charted, referenced, and not a stub CloversMallRat (talk) 23:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- wp:v: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation." The 2 new refs are also blogs, one of which doesn't even have a copy editor to fix spelling mistakes. The genre chart is not referenced, and there's no mention of a major chart. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-07-25t15:29z