Revision as of 20:06, 27 July 2009 editVanished User 1004 (talk | contribs)24,859 edits →Warning - July 2009: Actually...no.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:10, 27 July 2009 edit undo144.160.130.16 (talk) Undid revision 304538634 by Sinneed (talk) - I Do not agree, Warning should stay. It shows proofs of your vandalismNext edit → | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
== Please add new sections at the BOTTOM == | == Please add new sections at the BOTTOM == | ||
] (]) 01:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC) | ] (]) 01:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Warning - July 2009 == | |||
] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits of ]. <br> The next time you do vandalisms you did at ], you '''will''' be ] for disruptive editing and vandalism. | |||
In , you have deleted two very important references and the related text without any discussion. , third paragraph clearly says "Police said Sukhdev Singh, himself a former police constable, was responsible for a string of murders and a '''Major Bank Robbery''' | |||
and clearly says "Labh Singh masterminded a bank robbery of Rs. 6 crore from a branch of Punjab | |||
National Bank in Ludhiana. This is reputed to be the largest ever bank robbery"<ref>http://books.google.com/books?ei=GTtcSpnDHYrklATB-NCpBw&q=labh+singh+largest+ever+Punjab+national+bank&btnG=Search+Books</ref>. I would advice you to read the references thoroughly and if you have any issues then please use talk page to resolve any issues. But deleting such imporatant text and valuable references constitute vandalism. Also your edit statement "Source is already a named source in the article, and it doesn't mention the bank robbery. Warning...if I can figure out which of the IP herd made that change easily" was a complete lie. Because, as proved above, reference does talk about the bank robbery. | |||
In , you have added useless "CN" (alongwith a threat "Brief CN for the association with Bhindranwale. I'll drop it today without a source" for Labh Singh's association with ]), when clearly says that in in "early 80s, he came under the influence of Bhindranwale and resigned from the police force", clearly says that ..."Labh Singh, a close confederate of (Sant) Bhindranwale's", and in the same page Labh Singh says "I can't show my back to Sant Ji, I will fight with him and face martyrdom in this place". you have simply changed the section "Association with Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale" to "Joining Sikh militants to further your ].--] (]) 19:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
you have lied by saying "source is about that person but doesn't tie to the murder of the publisher" eventhough the reference clearly say that "In Punjab his name figured in the 38 cases of violence taking place between 1983 and 86, including the one in which the editor of the Hind Samachar group of newspaper Ramesh Chander was gunned down in Jalandhar"--] (]) 19:27, 27 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Please note that your vandalism is huge. You are destroying the article, killing the references and hard work of other editors. STOP IT NOW. --] (]) 19:27, 27 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Since, all these points prove that you lied repeatedly to push your ], you killed the legitimate references, hence this article will be restored to your pre-vandalism form as soon as it is unprotected.--] (]) 19:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:10, 27 July 2009
I have decided that posts here will generally be answered both here, and on the poster's talk page. I will generally include a copy of the post I am answering as well. I spend a bit of time patrolling recent changes. When I make a mistake, please note:
|
Archive 1 - 2008 September - 2009 February 15 - any previous, see History, sorry
Archive 2 - 2009 February 15 - 2009 July 25
Please add new sections at the BOTTOM
- sinneed (talk) 01:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Warning - July 2009
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits of Labh Singh.
The next time you do vandalisms you did at Labh Singh, you will be blocked for disruptive editing and vandalism.
In edit 1, you have deleted two very important references and the related text without any discussion. in first reference, third paragraph clearly says "Police said Sukhdev Singh, himself a former police constable, was responsible for a string of murders and a Major Bank Robbery and 2nd reference clearly says "Labh Singh masterminded a bank robbery of Rs. 6 crore from a branch of Punjab National Bank in Ludhiana. This is reputed to be the largest ever bank robbery". I would advice you to read the references thoroughly and if you have any issues then please use talk page to resolve any issues. But deleting such imporatant text and valuable references constitute vandalism. Also your edit statement "Source is already a named source in the article, and it doesn't mention the bank robbery. Warning...if I can figure out which of the IP herd made that change easily" was a complete lie. Because, as proved above, reference does talk about the bank robbery.
In edit 2, you have added useless "CN" (alongwith a threat "Brief CN for the association with Bhindranwale. I'll drop it today without a source" for Labh Singh's association with Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale), when this reference clearly says that in in "early 80s, he came under the influence of Bhindranwale and resigned from the police force", reference 2 clearly says that ..."Labh Singh, a close confederate of (Sant) Bhindranwale's", and in the same page Labh Singh says "I can't show my back to Sant Ji, I will fight with him and face martyrdom in this place". here you have simply changed the section "Association with Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale" to "Joining Sikh militants to further your POV.--144.160.130.16 (talk) 19:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Here you have lied by saying "source is about that person but doesn't tie to the murder of the publisher" eventhough the reference clearly say that "In Punjab his name figured in the 38 cases of violence taking place between 1983 and 86, including the one in which the editor of the Hind Samachar group of newspaper Ramesh Chander was gunned down in Jalandhar"--144.160.130.16 (talk) 19:27, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Please note that your vandalism is huge. You are destroying the article, killing the references and hard work of other editors. STOP IT NOW. --144.160.130.16 (talk) 19:27, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Since, all these points prove that you lied repeatedly to push your POV, you killed the legitimate references, hence this article will be restored to your pre-vandalism form as soon as it is unprotected.--144.160.130.16 (talk) 19:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)