| Revision as of 02:49, 10 August 2009 editTheserialcomma (talk | contribs)3,804 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:58, 10 August 2009 edit undoJéské Couriano (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers40,295 edits →User:McJeff/BlockLog: KeepNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
| semi attack page, claims an unnamed editor has a "long history of using templates to bait and harass people, and was given a 5 day block for having done so (using templates to bait and harass people?)" which is a lie, but he does not provide evidence. what is the purpose of this page? how does it help wikipedia? what does one unnamed editor's block in july 2009 have to do with building an encyclopedia, and how does this warrant the usage of wikipedia's resources? this page should be deleted for its pointlessness. ] (]) 02:47, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | semi attack page, claims an unnamed editor has a "long history of using templates to bait and harass people, and was given a 5 day block for having done so (using templates to bait and harass people?)" which is a lie, but he does not provide evidence. what is the purpose of this page? how does it help wikipedia? what does one unnamed editor's block in july 2009 have to do with building an encyclopedia, and how does this warrant the usage of wikipedia's resources? this page should be deleted for its pointlessness. ] (]) 02:47, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :'''Weak Keep'''; this'd only be a personal attack if he named the editor and had no evidence to back up his claim. However, even unclaimed this has the potential to torque off others, so if he removes the claim from the page this'd be a-OK, as the page's purpose is very much legitimate (much like my ]). -<font color="32CD32">'']''</font> <font color="4682B4"><sup>(] ])</sup></font> 03:58, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:58, 10 August 2009
User:McJeff/BlockLog
semi attack page, claims an unnamed editor has a "long history of using templates to bait and harass people, and was given a 5 day block for having done so (using templates to bait and harass people?)" which is a lie, but he does not provide evidence. what is the purpose of this page? how does it help wikipedia? what does one unnamed editor's block in july 2009 have to do with building an encyclopedia, and how does this warrant the usage of wikipedia's resources? this page should be deleted for its pointlessness. Theserialcomma (talk) 02:47, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Keep; this'd only be a personal attack if he named the editor and had no evidence to back up his claim. However, even unclaimed this has the potential to torque off others, so if he removes the claim from the page this'd be a-OK, as the page's purpose is very much legitimate (much like my no-sockpuppet userbox). -Jeremy 03:58, 10 August 2009 (UTC)