| Revision as of 01:31, 11 August 2009 editThinking of England (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers14,533 edits →Equador, Rio Grande do Norte: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:27, 13 August 2009 edit undoThinking of England (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers14,533 edits →Equador, Rio Grande do Norte: What the mind reads; other sins; consider a "Delete"; speedy opportunity lostNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| Hello Victor. Back in February, you this article with a de/do typo in the title (as "Equador, Rio Grande <b>de</b> Norte"). I just noticed that yesterday and to ]. I have also ] the resulting redirect (from the original title). We would welcome you input at that discussion. -- ] (]) 01:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | Hello Victor. Back in February, you this article with a de/do typo in the title (as "Equador, Rio Grande <b>de</b> Norte"). I just noticed that yesterday and to ]. I have also ] the resulting redirect (from the original title). We would welcome you input at that discussion. -- ] (]) 01:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :You wrote, "That was an unforgivable typo for a Brazilian like me" Bah! Two small, roundish letters looking much alike. It is amazing what the brain will read when it ''knows'' what is written. I'm not trying to rub it in, but you might be amused to look at the article's . You it in February, moments after creating ], but using that article as boilerplate you forgot to change ''Tibau'' to ''Equador'' in the map caption and the first word in the lead. Within a few minutes you recognized half your mistake and , but the first word in the lead remained ''Tibau'' until it was in July. | |||
| :I assume that your note at the ] was in support of deletion. In that case, I'd appreciate you prefacing it with a '''Delete'''. (I hope you don't mind that I outdented you comment there to better respond to another editor.) | |||
| :This was my first move ever, and had I been more familiar with issues surrounding the resulting redirect I would have notified you of the title typo allowing you to do the move yourself and speedy deleting the redirect under ] (Author requests deletion). I apologize for dragging this into RfD, but there's no way out now but for slogging through. -- ] (]) 02:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:27, 13 August 2009
class="wikitable "
 | Victor Lopes (talk) is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
| Please leave a new message. |
- Please, be civil. Uncivil comments and personal attacks will be answered with a single {{uw-npa1}} and a personal request for more polite words.
- Sign your posts with ~~~~ (four tildes).
- I will reply anything you post here on your talk page, by creating a new section on it, unless you ask me not to do so, or unless you have something written on your talk page instructing me about replying to you.
- I never edit what others have written here. However, if you place a comment on the wrong place, I will quickly place it on the right place. Also, if you just write any nonsense thing, I will erase it mercilessly. Heavy offenses and stuff will be erased too.
- Any post notifying me about AfD, speedy deletion, orphaned images, fair-use problems, etc, will be removed once the problem is solved. It includes the ones in the archives.
- Btw, this page will be archived every three months.
Fauna of West Virginia your EDIT
Firstly, may I apologize that my local dialect of American English is not up to your apperant level of worthy. You changed the terminology in the article, Fauna of West Virginia. You changed, for example to the term, "Geology (basically study of dirt and rocks), whereby the meaning in the terminology as I used, using the terminology, instead of geology, but, meaning the "life zones" (proper) of West Virginia which means more to the environment beyond simply dirt. Life zones in the Department of Natural Resources' terminiolgy is more accurate in the context of animals living in these various environments here in the state. Geology study's "dirt" and Rck" formations that go down into the earth beyond the crust. You have completely changed the meaning of this and other sentenses about our fauna. "Life Zones" include our particular vegitation as well. Clearly, some of us West Virginian's dialect of "American English" is different than Brasillian English. Your edits have completely changed the meaning of some sentenses. I admit I am not a scholar in the the studies of communication and literature, however it seems, one needs not a Doctorites Degree or a least a class in Literature from one of our local universities to make edits. Thankyou for changing our definitions within the text of the article. Cheers Conaughy (talk) 18:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I see... definitions are a big thing with me--Your style edits are appreciated and thanks for assistance. Conaughy (talk) 23:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
AN
You have been mentioned on the administrators' noticeboard. Please see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Victor Lopes for more. NW (Talk) 16:49, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
UFO sightings in New Jersey 1978 restored
I have restored UFO sightings in New Jersey 1978 per your request since it was deleted via prod. It will, however, need to establish notability through references in third party reliable sources if it is going to stand up more scrutiny.
If you need any further assistance (such as copies of other articles you had deleted), let me know.
Have a nice day, ThaddeusB (talk) 02:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Equador, Rio Grande do Norte
Hello Victor. Back in February, you created this article with a de/do typo in the title (as "Equador, Rio Grande de Norte"). I just noticed that yesterday and moved it to Equador, Rio Grande do Norte. I have also listed for deletion the resulting redirect (from the original title). We would welcome you input at that discussion. -- Thinking of England (talk) 01:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- You wrote, "That was an unforgivable typo for a Brazilian like me" Bah! Two small, roundish letters looking much alike. It is amazing what the brain will read when it knows what is written. I'm not trying to rub it in, but you might be amused to look at the article's history. You created it in February, moments after creating Tibau, but using that article as boilerplate you forgot to change Tibau to Equador in the map caption and the first word in the lead. Within a few minutes you recognized half your mistake and fixed the caption, but the first word in the lead remained Tibau until it was fixed in July.
- I assume that your note at the RfD was in support of deletion. In that case, I'd appreciate you prefacing it with a Delete. (I hope you don't mind that I outdented you comment there to better respond to another editor.)
- This was my first move ever, and had I been more familiar with issues surrounding the resulting redirect I would have notified you of the title typo allowing you to do the move yourself and speedy deleting the redirect under G7 (Author requests deletion). I apologize for dragging this into RfD, but there's no way out now but for slogging through. -- Thinking of England (talk) 02:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)