| Revision as of 20:10, 10 December 2005 editJohn K (talk | contribs)Administrators59,945 edits explain decision to archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:22, 11 December 2005 edit undoEffK (talk | contribs)1,566 edits →Kenney bad faith Archiving and Kenney Censorship harassmentNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| I have archived the ongoing "discussion" which seems to amount to little more than ranting monologues by EffK. ] 20:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | I have archived the ongoing "discussion" which seems to amount to little more than ranting monologues by EffK. ] 20:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==Kenney bad faith Archiving and Kenney Censorship harassment== | |||
| Dear friendly Kenney, not withstanding your earliest errors and retractions and use of the words shit and bullshit, you now provoke me most severely with no justification whatever. If this is your idea of good faith, then you are indeed a mystery to me. I showed exactly that which needed to be addressed in the question of this article, and I regret more than these words can tell you the manner of you dismissal. Garbage I suppose is one up from '''shit''' you previously used. You are a disgrace to good faith, Sir, as you must presumably know. Only inability to deal with the valid points or intellectual laziness or pure spite can have motivated your actions which hide valid questions related to the incorrect. I shall not be induced by your wrongs, to join you in wrong. Any independant editor should open the Archive prior to battling with these ridiculous editors.] 01:22, 11 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:22, 11 December 2005
Previous discussions:
I have archived the ongoing "discussion" which seems to amount to little more than ranting monologues by EffK. john k 20:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Kenney bad faith Archiving and Kenney Censorship harassment
Dear friendly Kenney, not withstanding your earliest errors and retractions and use of the words shit and bullshit, you now provoke me most severely with no justification whatever. If this is your idea of good faith, then you are indeed a mystery to me. I showed exactly that which needed to be addressed in the question of this article, and I regret more than these words can tell you the manner of you dismissal. Garbage I suppose is one up from shit you previously used. You are a disgrace to good faith, Sir, as you must presumably know. Only inability to deal with the valid points or intellectual laziness or pure spite can have motivated your actions which hide valid questions related to the incorrect. I shall not be induced by your wrongs, to join you in wrong. Any independant editor should open the Archive prior to battling with these ridiculous editors.EffK 01:22, 11 December 2005 (UTC)