Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wisesabre: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:27, 20 December 2005 editWisesabre (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users630 edits Warning← Previous edit Revision as of 10:09, 22 December 2005 edit undoDbachmann (talk | contribs)227,714 edits rājputNext edit →
Line 156: Line 156:
==rājput== ==rājput==
my transliteration was of the ], simply. I looked at ], but I didn't find any Romanization scheme. We do have ], which interestingly explains transliteration between the Arabic and the Devanagari scripts. If you know about Romanization of Urdu, please consider adding it to ]; regards, ] <small>]</small> 17:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC) my transliteration was of the ], simply. I looked at ], but I didn't find any Romanization scheme. We do have ], which interestingly explains transliteration between the Arabic and the Devanagari scripts. If you know about Romanization of Urdu, please consider adding it to ]; regards, ] <small>]</small> 17:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
:from the page you link to, it appears that Urdu in the Arabic alphabet is considered a transliteration of Hindi (Devanagari); so the Romanization used is probably identical to the Hindi one (i.e. don't romanize the Arabic letters, transliterate into Devanagari first, and romanize that, according to ]).
:your presence is sorely needed here. I don't expect you get many Hindu trolls on ur:, but they really seem to flock to en:. Ultimately, they will end up at ] if they go on like this. Their behaviour is more than enough for the arbcom to ban them, but somebody has to take the time for an arbitration case. I am committed to restoring a sane working environment at en:, where Hindus, Muslims and "whiteboys" can work together in peace. ] <small>]</small> 10:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:09, 22 December 2005

Warning

You have reverted more then thrice in a 24 hour period and you can be reported for 3RR. Shivraj Singh 20:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)


Shiv you may report it (you should)Wisesabre 06:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Apologies

اسلام دوست، از غلط کييا تا همنے، وه ديگر شخص بار بار خرابی کراتا. ته اُسے راست کرنا تا و اُسکے دراثنا مےنے اپ کی ترميم دوباره داخل کرنا فراموش کردياتا.


IDRIVE

[REDACTED]
Thank you for your support of This week's Improvement Drive.
This week Spice trade was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Map

Hi, I restored the old map because country level articles have a map showing location in the continent at the top infobox. If you have a better non-copyvio map, please add it to the subdivisions section. Thanks a lot. --Ragib 15:56, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

What's going on at Hindi and Urdu language

Basically, we have a recalcitrant editor, Happytime (talk · contribs), who puts in POV edits attempting to erase the connections between Hindi and Urdu, and then refuses to even attempt to reach a consensus with the editors who disagree with him. Sukh and I have been taking turns reverting his edits, but he just won't give up. Most recently, he's taken to deleting critical comments entirely - see the history of Talk:Urdu language, and his own talk page. It's clear that he's not acting in good faith; it's not at all apparent that he has any interest in cooperating with other people. We're probably heading towards formal dispute resolution soon. --skoosh (háblame) 20:35, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Wisabre, User Sukh has been persistently reverting to some unreasonable edits. Much discussion took place and an outcome was reached, then Sukhinder Sukh (talk · contribs) wasn't satisfied so he decided to start a war. He has formed an alliance now with User Skoosh (talk · contribs) to add these pro-Sikh anti-Muslim anti-Hindu changes throughout multiple pages. These must be neutral and based on fact, not whims and desires. They keep reverting my changes. Please revert their erroneous edits.---Happytime
Anybody who knows anything about Hindi and Urdu realise that their separation is based on three factors: script, religion and politics. The vernacular version of Hindi and Urdu are the same language. A language is defined by the people that speak it - not by government or religious propaganda.
  • that is wrong, A language is defined by the fundamentals. If you add something into a language, you can't call it the same language. It is true that at present times Urdu and Hindi are used mostly at professional levels. The slang that is mostly used however, (similar to what is used in Bollywood films) is referred to as Hindustani, which is a combination of languages.-----------Happytime
Also the user has been editing Sikhism and removing central parts of Sikh belief (i.e. reincarnation) and also making edits to Khalistan that are strikingly similar to edits made by User:thetruth (hence I believe the two users to be the same although I may be wrong).
  • this is just getting out of hand, you need to stop these claims you are adding everywhere.
As an Urdu speaker yourself I hope you agree with me. There is definately the need to document 'higher' Hindi and Urdu which both draw from very different vocabularies. But 'higher' Hindi and Urdu is not the main tongue for people in Northern India/Pakistan. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 22:15, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  • These pages are title HINDI and URDU respectively. This refers to the original language, not slang. You could create a page called slang Hindi-Urdu, then I would have no disagreement.
I am not a native urdu or hindi speaker, but having spoken to many Indians and Pakistanis, I find no spectacular differences between the languages, other than the choice of words. Considering the history of the Hindusthani language, I agree with Sukh (talk · contribs) and Skoosh (talk · contribs). I don't see any pro/anti Muslim/Hindu thing here. Thanks. --Ragib 22:23, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  • many Indians and Pakistanis often view Bollywood films, because of this and the slang that has developed in these countries, what they speak is similar. If you were to use compelte Urdu and complete Hindi in their purest forms, they would be unintelligble to each other.---HT
To me Urdu might not even have slang cause most of the people who speak Urdu are well educated.I donot expect from them Slang urdu.
Urdu and Hindi have same origin.
The only way we could say that urdu and hindi are different if there grammer rules are different.basic hindi and urdu words are same and i dont know hindi grammer rules and i think it would b hard for you to find anyone who knows both grammer rules.الثاقب (WiseSabre| talk) 23:20, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Urdu and Hindi have IDENTICAL grammar . Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 23:30, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Gah.. HT has been readin a lot of stuff from "Pakistan Studies" lately as it seems. I'm not a native speaker of Hindi. I live in Britain and have Urdu friends and Hindi friends. Their grammar seems to be exactly same. AMbroodEY 09:32, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Happytime

Hi,

I see you've been involved in the revert wars at Hindi, Urdu and Hindustani. I believe there is must more to these changes than initially meets the eye and I would appreciate it if you could add evidence against this user at User:Sukh/Revert_War_Evidence. I'm compiling this for a RFC. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 21:32, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Saqib Saud

It doesn't take a brain surgeon to find out who you are, especially if you know people in Lahore. Anyways, you and your friends were pretty vicious on the discussion page. I should it to a few co-workers who are of the Wahabbi Jamaat-i-Islami believers and they were so pissed with you, they began lecturing me that Islam doesn't believe in caste and that a muslim claiming a caste and that to a Hindu one is Haram. I showed them that Muslims do believe in Caste and this discussion shows that its alive and well in Pakistan. Then they got all excited and said they were going to bring this to the attention of the orginisation at the next meeting (of the Jamaat-i-Islami). I found it hillarious since it seems no one is ever happy. Hope all is well, and take care Gorkhali 05:50, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Dear Saqib

I was always trying to be polite but things started getting personal which is usually the case in a lot of discussions where people cannot meet face to face and have time to discuss topics instead of typing away.

Because of this discussion, I was able to give to my Muslim friends to bring more awareness that the Hindu Caste system is alive and well in Islamic Pakistan. I know you got upset but you have understand that Caste is not simply who your father is, people can loose their Caste. However, I appreciate your cooling down and leaving me a civil message.

No ill will, hope all is well, Take care Gorkhali 18:53, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:World 5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:World 5.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Misplaced Pages (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Secretlondon 08:36, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

absolutely

imperative that you take a look at this ] BrandonYusufToropov 15:38, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Eid Mubarak

Eid Mubarak to you and best wishes. --a.n.o.n.y.m 02:48, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Eid Mubarak

Best wishes to you and yours, BrandonYusufToropov 16:53, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

And Eid Mubarak from me, too. Wish you all the best. --Ragib 17:19, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Eid Mubarak

Eid Mubarak and best wishes from my side . F.a.y. 18:59, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

BTW are you from Pakistan . F.a.y. 19:03, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Re: Rajput

Hello; I recently rolled back your edits to this article because they appear to remove a substantial amount of the information from it. If you'd care to explain what you're doing on the talk page, I would be grateful - the article in question undergoes a number of revert wars and is the subject of much discussion. Rob Church 19:38, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Shiv

Saqib,

This guy is impossible. I think not until he matures can we expect any sensible behavior from him. I am trying to calm him down and tell him that his concerns are being answered in the article. If he still doesn't agree then I would say let's see how long will it take us to involve the mods in the Sher Shah Suri article.

خرم Khurram 16:26, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Maybe you are right bro. I think we need to file for it since he is just impossible to put sense into.

خرم Khurram 15:01, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Help

Please vote to merge and redirect Islamofascism to Neofascism and religion...

... which is where it belongs. Vote here: BrandonYusufToropov 21:07, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Terrorism in Kashmir

Thanks for removing POV and inaccurate material from the article. Cheers and happy editing --Deepak|वार्ता 19:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Civility

In regards to this edit summary, please keep WP:CIV in mind. I know about Shivraj, and I know he has his own civility problems, but there is no justification for incivility. Do not bait him, either. This is just to let you know that that is not acceptable, and I hope you'll think more before speaking in the future. Dmcdevit·t 22:55, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Ok!, I'd keep that in mind. Thanks Wisesabre 03:10, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

You noticed the inclusion of copyright material in the Khalistan article?

The copyright violation material says you should merely have reverted to a version that predated the inclusion of the copyright material. -- Geo Swan 17:27, 4 December 2005 (UTC)


Urdu Encyclopaedia

I would love to contribute, but I am ignorant as to how I can actually type in Urdu, please let me know or direct me to where I can find out. Thanks DigiBullet 19:59, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Shiv

Saqib please wait about half an hour before reverting Shiv's edits. He is somehow trying to be accomodating and I think we shall give him a chance no matter how thin the hopes are. Don't you agree my brother?

خرم Khurram 22:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

OK, agreed. I'm going to sleep. FeImmanUllah Wisesabre 22:14, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks bro. Sweet dreams :)
خرم Khurram 22:21, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


Who are you?

And why are you pushing garbage on to rajput page? --DPSingh 10:58, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

rājput

my transliteration was of the Arabic alphabet, simply. I looked at Urdu, but I didn't find any Romanization scheme. We do have Image:Urdu_alphabets.png, which interestingly explains transliteration between the Arabic and the Devanagari scripts. If you know about Romanization of Urdu, please consider adding it to Urdu; regards, dab () 17:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

from the page you link to, it appears that Urdu in the Arabic alphabet is considered a transliteration of Hindi (Devanagari); so the Romanization used is probably identical to the Hindi one (i.e. don't romanize the Arabic letters, transliterate into Devanagari first, and romanize that, according to IAST).
your presence is sorely needed here. I don't expect you get many Hindu trolls on ur:, but they really seem to flock to en:. Ultimately, they will end up at WP:RFAr if they go on like this. Their behaviour is more than enough for the arbcom to ban them, but somebody has to take the time for an arbitration case. I am committed to restoring a sane working environment at en:, where Hindus, Muslims and "whiteboys" can work together in peace. dab () 10:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
User talk:Wisesabre: Difference between revisions Add topic