Misplaced Pages

User talk:Doctorfluffy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:58, 8 November 2009 editDalejenkins (talk | contribs)6,182 edits Chronology of Star Wars: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 20:14, 16 November 2009 edit undoNuclearWarfare (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,665 edits Belial in popular culture: new sectionNext edit →
Line 33: Line 33:


An AFD discussion that you have previously participated in has been reignited. See ] for more the new discussion. ''']''' 10:58, 8 November 2009 (UTC) An AFD discussion that you have previously participated in has been reignited. See ] for more the new discussion. ''']''' 10:58, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

Please stop unilaterally redirecting this article. You have ] on the talk page. Thank you, <font color="navy">''']</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 20:14, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:14, 16 November 2009

Archives
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8

RFA spam

Thank you for participating in WP:Requests for adminship/Kww 3
Sometimes, being turned back at the door isn't such a bad thing
Kww(talk) 18:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
I hope you stick with it. I read the crat discussion and it really was a close call. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 18:46, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Moved discussion to Misplaced Pages talk:Notability

I moved the discussion to the Misplaced Pages talk:Notability as it's more appropriate for the survey. Any concerns please direct over there. Robert9673 (talk) 05:41, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Robert Bunsen

Like you I do not understand why there is constant vandalism on this page: a while ago I made a request for some protection for the page but it seems nothing has happened. A lot of time is being wasted when each occurrence of vandalism needs to be reverted.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 09:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

regarding Cairhien

The reason for my undoing of your blanking was due to references from Places in the Wheel of Time series, in which I mean that they all need to be taken into consideration of deletion and not only one of them which have own articles. AzaToth 19:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Chronology of Star Wars

An AFD discussion that you have previously participated in has been reignited. See here for more the new discussion. Dale 10:58, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Belial in popular culture

Please stop unilaterally redirecting this article. You have been bold and have been reverted, now it is time to discuss on the talk page. Thank you, NW (Talk) 20:14, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Doctorfluffy: Difference between revisions Add topic