Misplaced Pages

Difficulty of learning languages: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:35, 30 November 2009 editRjanag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users58,857 edits References: no need for extra columns← Previous edit Revision as of 00:38, 3 December 2009 edit undo71.233.11.117 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{refimprove|date=November 2009}} {{refimprove|date=November 2009}}


Many languages are claimed to be the '''hardest language''' to learn. Assessments have been used to determine language difficulty based on: the ease with which infants learn a language as their ] and how challenging language is to learn as a ] by older children or adults. Many languages are claimed to be the '''hardest language''' to learn. Assessments have been used to determine language difficulty based on: the ease with which infants learn a language as their ] and how challenging language is tas a ] by older children or adults.


==Natural acquisition== ==Natural acquisition==
Line 8: Line 8:


==As a second language== ==As a second language==
Learning a language as an adult strongly depends on the learner's ]. Because ] strongly depends on the learner's ] it is difficult to make a universal ranking of difficulty. For example, a native English speaker will learn ] much easier than a native Japanese speaker would - and vice versa. In general, the closer the second language is in relation to vocabulary, sentence structure and other factors to the learner's native tougue the easier acquisition will be. This "proximity" of the target language is not necessarily a function of ] but may also be ], such as a chance similarity of ]. Differences in phonology are often insurmountable for the learner, and will be apparent in an ] in non-native speakers even after many years of proficient use of the learned language. Acquisition of native phonology is also complete very early in children's language acquisition, before the age of one year: that is, what is the "easiest" part of language acquisition for infants (completed first) is the "hardest" part for adult learners (completed last, if ever). Learning a language as an adult strongly depends on the learner's ]. Because ] strongly depends on the learner's ] it is difficult to make a universal ranking of difficulty. For example, a native English speaker will learn ] much easier than a native Japanese speaker would - and vice versa. In general, the closer the second language is in relation to vocabulary, sentence structure and other factors to the learner's native tougue the easier acquisition will be. This "proximity" of the target language is not nece

The question which of two given languages A and B is more difficult to learn may be considered by comparing the performance of native speakers of A learning B with that of native speakers of B learning A. For example, a study on speech comprehension by German immigrants to the USA and American immigrants to Germany found that native English speakers learning ] as adults had a disadvantage on certain grammatical tasks, while they had an advantage in lexical tasks compared to their native German-speaking counterparts learning ].<ref>Scherag, A., Demuth, L., Rösler, F., Neville, H.J., Röder, B., ''The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspects''. Cognition 93 (2004),B97-B108.</ref> The question which of two given languages A and B is more difficult to learn may be considered by comparing the performance of native speakers of A learning B with that of native speakers of B learning A. For example, a study on speech comprehension by German immigrants to the USA and American immigrants to Germany found that native English speakers learning ] as adults had a disadvantage on certain grammatical tasks, while they had an advantage in lexical tasks compared to their native German-speaking counterparts learning ].<ref>Scherag, A., Demuth, L., Rösler, F., Neville, H.J., Röder, B., ''The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspects''. Cognition 93 (2004),B97-B108.</ref>

Revision as of 00:38, 3 December 2009

This article may require cleanup to meet Misplaced Pages's quality standards. No cleanup reason has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (November 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Difficulty of learning languages" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Many languages are claimed to be the hardest language to learn. Assessments have been used to determine language difficulty based on: the ease with which infants learn a language as their first language and how challenging language is tas a second language by older children or adults.

Natural acquisition

The question of the most difficult language to acquire can be considered by determining when children are able to speak grammatically correctly, as judged by adult speakers.

As a second language

Learning a language as an adult strongly depends on the learner's native language. Because second language acquisition strongly depends on the learner's native language it is difficult to make a universal ranking of difficulty. For example, a native English speaker will learn Frisian much easier than a native Japanese speaker would - and vice versa. In general, the closer the second language is in relation to vocabulary, sentence structure and other factors to the learner's native tougue the easier acquisition will be. This "proximity" of the target language is not nece The question which of two given languages A and B is more difficult to learn may be considered by comparing the performance of native speakers of A learning B with that of native speakers of B learning A. For example, a study on speech comprehension by German immigrants to the USA and American immigrants to Germany found that native English speakers learning German as adults had a disadvantage on certain grammatical tasks, while they had an advantage in lexical tasks compared to their native German-speaking counterparts learning English.

Diplomats and defense language training gives some interesting data, although it covers a limited selection of languages:

  • The Foreign Service Institute (FSI) of the US Department of State has compiled approximate learning expectations for a number of languages. Of the 63 languages analyzed, the five most difficult languages to reach proficiency in speaking and proficiency in reading (for native English speakers who already know other languages), requiring 88 weeks, are: "Arabic, Cantonese, Mandarin, Japanese, Korean", with Japanese being the most difficult.

See also

References

  1. Scherag, A., Demuth, L., Rösler, F., Neville, H.J., Röder, B., The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspects. Cognition 93 (2004),B97-B108.
  2. (2007) National Virtual Translation Center

External links

Categories:
Difficulty of learning languages: Difference between revisions Add topic