Revision as of 23:25, 4 February 2010 view sourceClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,385,862 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:TreasuryTag/Archives/2010/Feb. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:15, 6 February 2010 view source John Quincy Adding Machine (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,069 edits →Talk:Passport: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
{{POTD}} | {{POTD}} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== ] == | |||
Several weeks ago, you expressed support for removing visa-free articles from passport pages. This discussion has been continuing from that point on, on ], and eventually only between three users. Several days ago, {{user|Ozguroot}}, a suspected sockpuppet, ] 15 users, all who have expressed a negative viewpoint, to come to the discussion and utterly overwhelm a budding and tenuously reached compromise. This is the second time he has canvassed users to the dispute. Prior to the canvassing incident, I requested mediation at ], with no response. I have reported Ozguroot's canvassing at ], again with no response. I am utterly disheartened by the community apathy, it seems our dislike for the "dramafest at ANI" has become a disdain for dispute resolution of any kind, an apathy for processes of justice. To make sure the weeks' worth of discussion at ] aren't undermined by an egomaniacal nationalist, a sockpuppet, and their canvassed hordes, and in light of the utter apathy I have received from the community, I am notifying all editors who expressed support for the proposal. I am aware of the tenuous ledge on which I am pirouetting, but in the absence of better advice (as sought at ANI), I am sure you will agree it is only fair to attempt to balance the canvassed users who expressed a negative viewpoint. Not to be melodramatic, but to quote Edmund Burke: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing". —] 14:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:15, 6 February 2010
TreasuryTag is currently, or is going to be, away from Misplaced Pages, between April 14 and April 19, 2009, and may not be able to respond immediately to queries. He may, however, edit a little unless he's using the splendid Wikibreak enforcer. |
User talk:TreasuryTag/Talkheader
Just to fix the formatting...
Talk:Passport
Several weeks ago, you expressed support for removing visa-free articles from passport pages. This discussion has been continuing from that point on, on Talk:Passport, and eventually only between three users. Several days ago, Ozguroot (talk · contribs), a suspected sockpuppet, canvassed 15 users, all who have expressed a negative viewpoint, to come to the discussion and utterly overwhelm a budding and tenuously reached compromise. This is the second time he has canvassed users to the dispute. Prior to the canvassing incident, I requested mediation at Misplaced Pages:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-02-04/Passport, with no response. I have reported Ozguroot's canvassing at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Ozguroot_canvassing_again, again with no response. I am utterly disheartened by the community apathy, it seems our dislike for the "dramafest at ANI" has become a disdain for dispute resolution of any kind, an apathy for processes of justice. To make sure the weeks' worth of discussion at Talk:Passport aren't undermined by an egomaniacal nationalist, a sockpuppet, and their canvassed hordes, and in light of the utter apathy I have received from the community, I am notifying all editors who expressed support for the proposal. I am aware of the tenuous ledge on which I am pirouetting, but in the absence of better advice (as sought at ANI), I am sure you will agree it is only fair to attempt to balance the canvassed users who expressed a negative viewpoint. Not to be melodramatic, but to quote Edmund Burke: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing". —what a crazy random happenstance 14:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)