| Revision as of 19:16, 16 February 2010 editBrews ohare (talk | contribs)47,831 editsm →Modification of Brews' sanctions← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:41, 22 February 2010 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,631 edits →Your edit to WP:AE: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Hi Clayt85: | Hi Clayt85: | ||
| :Thank for your support during this action. Unfortunately, despite your sensible observations, the effort appears likely to fail, with no attempt made to confront the issues, just a knee-jerk "me too" reaction to support the ]. Unfortunately, another blow to confidence in the arbitration process and its willingness to actually ''assess''. ] (]) 19:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | :Thank for your support during this action. Unfortunately, despite your sensible observations, the effort appears likely to fail, with no attempt made to confront the issues, just a knee-jerk "me too" reaction to support the ]. Unfortunately, another blow to confidence in the arbitration process and its willingness to actually ''assess''. ] (]) 19:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Your edit to ] == | |||
| I've rolled back your edit - please do not edit archived sections. If you disagree with the outcome of an enforcement, you may appeal it to the Arbitration Committee. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:41, 22 February 2010
Help
Hi, I'm posting this on your (and other members of the Maths Wikiproject) talk as we need editors who are knowledgeable about Mathematics to evaluate the following discussion and check out the editors and articles affected. Please follow the link below and comment if you can help.
Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Block_review_-_uninvolved_admin_request.
Thankyou. Exxolon (talk) 18:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Modification of Brews' sanctions
Hi Clayt85:
- Thank for your support during this action. Unfortunately, despite your sensible observations, the effort appears likely to fail, with no attempt made to confront the issues, just a knee-jerk "me too" reaction to support the status quo. Unfortunately, another blow to confidence in the arbitration process and its willingness to actually assess. Brews ohare (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Your edit to WP:AE
I've rolled back your edit - please do not edit archived sections. If you disagree with the outcome of an enforcement, you may appeal it to the Arbitration Committee. Thanks, Sandstein 19:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)