Misplaced Pages

North American Union: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:12, 25 April 2010 editThe Devil's Advocate (talk | contribs)19,695 editsm A Canadian-American union: fixed ref← Previous edit Revision as of 12:09, 25 April 2010 edit undoCanada Jack (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,048 edits History: Took out "then" for 2000 as it implies a set sequence of events. This is POV.Next edit →
Line 73: Line 73:
Since at least the mid-19th century, numerous concepts for a union between Canada, Mexico and the United States, some including ], ] and ] countries, have been proposed, such as the North American ]. Following the ] (NAFTA) and coinciding with the ] going into effect in 1993, which formed the European Union, there was speculation about the formation of a North American Union being a possible future step for the region.<ref>{{cite book|last=Bradshaw,|first=York W.| coauthors = Michael Wallace|title= |publisher=Pine Forge Press|year=1996|isbn=080399060X}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Kibel|first=Paul Stanton|title=|publisher=Routledge|year=1999|isbn=0415919959}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Fetzer|first=Joel S.|title=|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2000|isbn=0521786797}}</ref> Several concepts for continental integration of North America were developed in academic circles based on the European model, though few, if any, advocated or considered plausible moving to a ]-style system in the near term.<ref name="Toward a NAC">{{cite book |title=Toward a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New |last=Pastor |first=Robert |authorlink=Robert Pastor |coauthors= |year=2001 |publisher=] |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=0881323284 |pages=115}}</ref> Since at least the mid-19th century, numerous concepts for a union between Canada, Mexico and the United States, some including ], ] and ] countries, have been proposed, such as the North American ]. Following the ] (NAFTA) and coinciding with the ] going into effect in 1993, which formed the European Union, there was speculation about the formation of a North American Union being a possible future step for the region.<ref>{{cite book|last=Bradshaw,|first=York W.| coauthors = Michael Wallace|title= |publisher=Pine Forge Press|year=1996|isbn=080399060X}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Kibel|first=Paul Stanton|title=|publisher=Routledge|year=1999|isbn=0415919959}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Fetzer|first=Joel S.|title=|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2000|isbn=0521786797}}</ref> Several concepts for continental integration of North America were developed in academic circles based on the European model, though few, if any, advocated or considered plausible moving to a ]-style system in the near term.<ref name="Toward a NAC">{{cite book |title=Toward a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New |last=Pastor |first=Robert |authorlink=Robert Pastor |coauthors= |year=2001 |publisher=] |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=0881323284 |pages=115}}</ref>


Then President-Elect of Mexico ] went on ABC's "]" in 2000 and discussed his vision for an open U.S.-Mexico border in ten years.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2000/0728mexico_michaelidis.aspx|title=Open U.S.-Mexican Border|publisher=]|date=2000-07-28|accessdate=2010-4-19}}</ref> Some in the media saw this proposal for open borders as a call for or inevitable step towards a "North American Union" and received it with a mixture of praise and criticism, with critics like ] fearing it would mean an end to U.S. sovereignty.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/rbartley/?id=95000738|title=Open Nafta Borders? Why Not?|publisher=]|date=2001-07-02|accessdate=2010-4-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-krikorian070301.shtml|title=July Fourth in Post-America|publisher=]|date=2001-07-03|accessdate=2010-4-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080569/|title=Death of the West|publisher=]|date=2003-10-30|accessdate=2010-4-19}}</ref> Around this time a number of proposals were also put forward for an expansion of the NAFTA agreement, generically called "NAFTA-Plus." After taking office, Vicente Fox proposed one such plan to ] of the United States and Canadian Prime Minister ] that would move towards a supranational union in the form of the European Union. Fox's proposal was rejected by President Bush.<ref>{{cite book|last = Fox|first = Vicente|authorlink = Vicente Fox|title= |publisher=Viking|year=2007|isbn=0670018392}}</ref> Other proposals also advocated the creation of a North American union styled after the EU,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.alternet.org/globalization/12098/|title=A New Giant Sucking Sound|publisher=]|date=2001-12-18|accessdate=2010-4-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.clas.berkeley.edu/Events/fall2002/09-26-02-journalists/index.html|title=Perspectives on the United States and Mexico: A Journalists' Forum|publisher=]|date=2003-09-26|accessdate=2010-4-21}}</ref> though many academic and business groups advocated less dramatic changes involving the formation of a customs union or common market. The ] made security a high priority, particularly within the United States, and concerns about restrictions on North American trade also served as an impetus for greater integration. Amid this push for greater integration and concerns about the impact of heightened security on trade relations was an effort organized by the ], U.S. ], and the ] called the ].<ref>{{cite new|url=http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&EntryNo=10209|title=The Task Of Today's CCCE: Moving Multilateral Trade Forward|publisher=The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel|date=2009-10-04|accessdate=2009-12-01}}</ref> Several weeks before a meeting of North American leaders on March 23, 2005 the Task Force issued a press release and a statement from the Task Force's chairmen calling for deeper integration of NAFTA to form a North American Economic and Security Community by 2010.<ref>{{cite press release|title=Trinational Call for a North American Economic and Security Community by 2010|publisher=]|date=2005-03-14|url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/7914/|accessdate=2009-12-01}}</ref> In 2000, President-Elect of Mexico ] went on ABC's "]" and discussed his vision for an open U.S.-Mexico border in ten years.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2000/0728mexico_michaelidis.aspx|title=Open U.S.-Mexican Border|publisher=]|date=2000-07-28|accessdate=2010-4-19}}</ref> Some in the media saw this proposal for open borders as a call for or inevitable step towards a "North American Union" and received it with a mixture of praise and criticism, with critics like ] fearing it would mean an end to U.S. sovereignty.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/rbartley/?id=95000738|title=Open Nafta Borders? Why Not?|publisher=]|date=2001-07-02|accessdate=2010-4-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-krikorian070301.shtml|title=July Fourth in Post-America|publisher=]|date=2001-07-03|accessdate=2010-4-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080569/|title=Death of the West|publisher=]|date=2003-10-30|accessdate=2010-4-19}}</ref> Around this time a number of proposals were also put forward for an expansion of the NAFTA agreement, generically called "NAFTA-Plus." After taking office, Vicente Fox proposed one such plan to ] of the United States and Canadian Prime Minister ] that would move towards a supranational union in the form of the European Union. Fox's proposal was rejected by President Bush.<ref>{{cite book|last = Fox|first = Vicente|authorlink = Vicente Fox|title= |publisher=Viking|year=2007|isbn=0670018392}}</ref> Other proposals also advocated the creation of a North American union styled after the EU,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.alternet.org/globalization/12098/|title=A New Giant Sucking Sound|publisher=]|date=2001-12-18|accessdate=2010-4-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.clas.berkeley.edu/Events/fall2002/09-26-02-journalists/index.html|title=Perspectives on the United States and Mexico: A Journalists' Forum|publisher=]|date=2003-09-26|accessdate=2010-4-21}}</ref> though many academic and business groups advocated less dramatic changes involving the formation of a customs union or common market. The ] made security a high priority, particularly within the United States, and concerns about restrictions on North American trade also served as an impetus for greater integration. Amid this push for greater integration and concerns about the impact of heightened security on trade relations was an effort organized by the ], U.S. ], and the ] called the ].<ref>{{cite new|url=http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&EntryNo=10209|title=The Task Of Today's CCCE: Moving Multilateral Trade Forward|publisher=The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel|date=2009-10-04|accessdate=2009-12-01}}</ref> Several weeks before a meeting of North American leaders on March 23, 2005 the Task Force issued a press release and a statement from the Task Force's chairmen calling for deeper integration of NAFTA to form a North American Economic and Security Community by 2010.<ref>{{cite press release|title=Trinational Call for a North American Economic and Security Community by 2010|publisher=]|date=2005-03-14|url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/7914/|accessdate=2009-12-01}}</ref>


The ] (SPP) was formed at the meeting of North American leaders. It was described by the leaders of Canada, Mexico and the United States as a dialogue to provide greater cooperation on security and economic issues.<ref> at www.whitehouse.gov</ref> In response to later concerns, a section was put up on the initiative's site clarifying the SPP was not a legal agreement, that the initiative "does not seek to rewrite or renegotiate NAFTA", and that the partnership itself "creates no NAFTA-plus legal status."<ref name="spp faq"/> A number of academics and government officials at the time viewed the SPP as moving North America towards greater integration.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache%3AT390zn3UTsUJ%3Awww1.american.edu%2Fia%2Fcnas%2Fpdfs%2Fworkingpaper2_celorio.pdf+SPP+integration&hl=en&gl=us|title=The Current Debate Regarding the SPP: The ] (SPP) was formed at the meeting of North American leaders. It was described by the leaders of Canada, Mexico and the United States as a dialogue to provide greater cooperation on security and economic issues.<ref> at www.whitehouse.gov</ref> In response to later concerns, a section was put up on the initiative's site clarifying the SPP was not a legal agreement, that the initiative "does not seek to rewrite or renegotiate NAFTA", and that the partnership itself "creates no NAFTA-plus legal status."<ref name="spp faq"/> A number of academics and government officials at the time viewed the SPP as moving North America towards greater integration.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache%3AT390zn3UTsUJ%3Awww1.american.edu%2Fia%2Fcnas%2Fpdfs%2Fworkingpaper2_celorio.pdf+SPP+integration&hl=en&gl=us|title=The Current Debate Regarding the SPP:

Revision as of 12:09, 25 April 2010

Map showing the theoretical union located in the world map.

The North American Union (NAU) is a theoretical economic union, in some instances also a political union, of Canada, Mexico, and the United States. It is based on several concepts, some similar in structure to the European Union, occasionally including a common currency called the Amero or the North American Dollar.

While the idea for some form of union has been discussed or proposed in academic, business and political circles for many decades, government officials from all three nations say there are no plans to create such a union and no agreement to do so has been signed. The formation of a North American Union has been the subject of various conspiracy theories.

History

Main articles: Independent Task Force on North America and Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America

Since at least the mid-19th century, numerous concepts for a union between Canada, Mexico and the United States, some including Caribbean, Central American and South American countries, have been proposed, such as the North American Technate. Following the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and coinciding with the Maastricht Treaty going into effect in 1993, which formed the European Union, there was speculation about the formation of a North American Union being a possible future step for the region. Several concepts for continental integration of North America were developed in academic circles based on the European model, though few, if any, advocated or considered plausible moving to a European Union-style system in the near term.

In 2000, President-Elect of Mexico Vicente Fox went on ABC's "This Week" and discussed his vision for an open U.S.-Mexico border in ten years. Some in the media saw this proposal for open borders as a call for or inevitable step towards a "North American Union" and received it with a mixture of praise and criticism, with critics like Pat Buchanan fearing it would mean an end to U.S. sovereignty. Around this time a number of proposals were also put forward for an expansion of the NAFTA agreement, generically called "NAFTA-Plus." After taking office, Vicente Fox proposed one such plan to President Bush of the United States and Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien that would move towards a supranational union in the form of the European Union. Fox's proposal was rejected by President Bush. Other proposals also advocated the creation of a North American union styled after the EU, though many academic and business groups advocated less dramatic changes involving the formation of a customs union or common market. The September 11th attacks made security a high priority, particularly within the United States, and concerns about restrictions on North American trade also served as an impetus for greater integration. Amid this push for greater integration and concerns about the impact of heightened security on trade relations was an effort organized by the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, U.S. Council on Foreign Relations, and the Mexican Council on Foreign Relations called the Independent Task Force on North America. Several weeks before a meeting of North American leaders on March 23, 2005 the Task Force issued a press release and a statement from the Task Force's chairmen calling for deeper integration of NAFTA to form a North American Economic and Security Community by 2010.

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) was formed at the meeting of North American leaders. It was described by the leaders of Canada, Mexico and the United States as a dialogue to provide greater cooperation on security and economic issues. In response to later concerns, a section was put up on the initiative's site clarifying the SPP was not a legal agreement, that the initiative "does not seek to rewrite or renegotiate NAFTA", and that the partnership itself "creates no NAFTA-plus legal status." A number of academics and government officials at the time viewed the SPP as moving North America towards greater integration.

The Task Force published a report in May of 2005 which praised the SPP initiative and pushed for greater economic integration by 2010. They repeated their call for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter." In the report the Task Force said that a North American Community, which would be similar to the European Community which preceded the EU, should not rely on "grand schemes of confederation or union" and did not suggest a supranational government or a common currency. The Task Force’s recommendations included developing a North American customs union, common market, investment fund, energy strategy, set of regulatory standards, security perimeter, border pass, and advisory council, among other common goals.

In a private round-table discussion on March 15, 2006 U.S. on the Security and Prosperity Partnership Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez advocated creating a North American Competitiveness Council composed of business leaders from all three NAFTA countries in order to ensure sustainable regional integration and address issue that might impede such integration. Just over two weeks later the council was formed as an SPP working group. It has submitted several reports suggesting new measures on deepening integration of the NAFTA region including a Regulatory Cooperation Framework and a trilateral tax treaty to "provide clear rules governing tax matters affecting trade and investment between the three countries".

Several advocates of integration saw the SPP as being insufficient. One criticism was that the governments lacked a "vision of what North America might become" and as such did not provide the proper context that would allow the initiative to deal with barriers to deeper integration. Another problem seen with the dialogue was that it operated from a federal perspective at the exclusion of state, provincial, and local government involvement. The separation between the security aspect of the initiative and the economic aspect was also seen as a failing of the initiative.

Former Mexican president Vicente Fox is the only leader involved in the SPP process who has expressed a desire for a North American Union-style body. He has noted the success countries like Ireland and Spain have had in modernizing their economies and bringing higher standards of living for their citizens by joining what is now the European Union and has expressed the hope that Mexico could have a similar experience in a trade body of comparable scope in North America. Fox has, however, expressed frustration with the lack of progress on measures such as immigration reform, which proved to be contentious within the United States.

A Canadian-American union

Several works have discussed a union of Canada and the United States as a North American union or a potential intermediary step towards such a union with Mexico to be included at a later date. The latter form has been likened to the European Union's multi-speed approach towards integration with the United States advancing in its integration with Canada faster than with Mexico.

In this scenario the border between the U.S. and Canada would be opened up to goods, services, and people. Part of this could include the formation of a security perimeter around the two countries with reduced focus on security along the national borders. The perimeter approach has been discussed publicly by officials of the U.S. and Canadian governments.

Pursuing a union between Canada and the United States could raise concerns that such an agreement would set a precedent for a later agreement of the same kind with Mexico. Another concern is that Canada would end up seeing its sovereignty severely contrained in such a relationship.

Conspiracy theories

In 2005, claims emerged from critics of North American integration that a "North American Union" was not only being planned, but was being implemented by the governments of Canada, Mexico and the United States. These critics cited the formation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and claimed it was an attempt to dramatically alter the economic and political status quo between the countries outside of the scrutiny of the respective national legislatures, a critique heightened by the subsequent publication of the Independent Task Force on North America report which praised the SPP initiative and called for greater economic integration by 2010.

While a broad spectrum of observers criticize the secrecy of the SPP and its dominance by business groups, the specific claim that its true aim was to expand NAFTA into a North American Union analogous to the European Union (EU), with open borders and a common currency among other features, was being made by the fall of 2006, when conservative commentators Phyllis Schlafly, Jerome Corsi and Howard Phillips started a website dedicated to quashing what they perceived as the coming North American "Socialist mega-state."

The belief that a North American Union was being planned and implemented in secret became widespread, so much so that the NAU was a topic of debate during the 2008 American presidential campaigns and the subject of various U.S. Congressional resolutions designed to thwart its implementation. Prominent critics such as CNN’s Lou Dobbs and Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul denounced the concept, joined by left-wing groups in Canada, Internet blogs, and widely viewed videos and films such as "Zeitgeist". Corsi’s 2007 book "The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger with Mexico and Canada" also helped bring the NAU discussion into the mainstream. Others who dismiss these beliefs maintain they are the latest example of a long line of erroneous conspiracy theories which suggest that the United States’ sovereignty is being eroded by a secret cabal of foreign and domestic players.

Some of these NAU skeptics, while expressing concern about the lack of transparency of the SPP, note that this is not evidence of a plot to create a North American Union:

The idea of a regional union that effaces U.S. sovereignty is light-years away from George W. Bush's foreign policy of unilateral action and disdain for international law and institutions.

— 

Some NAU critics claim the actual goals of the SPP were confirmed by the Task Force, and by the Task Force’s co-chair American University professor Robert Pastor. Critics often cite Pastor as being the “father” of the NAU and his 2001 book "Towards a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New" has been called a blueprint for the plan, and includes a suggestion to adopt a common North American currency called the amero. Professor Robert Pastor is a Vice Chair of the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America who has suggested forming a North American Commission similar to the European Commission and other governing institutions for North America.

Various positive comments about a North American Union concept and an eventual common currency for the Americas by Vicente Fox, in particular some made during a promotional tour for a book in 2007, have been cited by critics as evidence that the body is in fact being enacted or planned.

Features of the NAU

States, Provinces, or Territories within North America.

Concepts of a North American Union share a number of common elements between them. NASCO and the SPP have both denied that there are any plans to establish a common currency, a "NAFTA Superhighway", or a North American Union in "Myths vs Facts" pages on their websites.

Amero

Main article: North American currency union

The amero is the appellation given to what would be the North American Union's counterpart to the euro. It was first proposed in 1999 by Canadian economist Herbert G. Grubel. A senior fellow of the Fraser Institute think-tank, he published a book entitled The Case for the Amero in September 1999, the year that the euro became a virtual currency. Robert Pastor, vice-chairman of the Independent Task Force on North America, supported Grubel's conclusions in his 2001 book Toward a North American Community, stating that: "In the long term, the amero is in the best interests of all three countries." Another Canadian think-tank, the conservative C.D. Howe Institute, advocates the creation of a shared currency between Canada and the United States. Although then-Mexican President Vicente Fox had expressed support for the idea, when Grubel brought up the idea to American officials, they said they were not interested, citing lack of benefits for the U.S.

The Director of International Economics at the Council on Foreign Relations, Benn Steil, has called monetary nationalism and globalization a dangerous combination. Furthermore, he's recommended that, in order to safely globalize, the world must "abandon unwanted currencies, replacing them with dollars, euros, and multinational currencies as yet unborn." Lending support for the end of national currencies, an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Eric van Wincoop, coauthored a journal article that argued the economical prudence of a common currency between nations, "The use of different moneys across borders can form a barrier as there are costs in exchanging currencies in spot and forward markets and traders face uncertainty about currency movements that cannot always be hedged. A common currency also leads to greater transparency of price differentials." Cross border trade costs are likened to that of a tariff roughly equivalent to 170%. Forty-four percent of that "tariff" is attributed to "border related trade barriers" which breaks down as follows, "a 8% policy barrier, a 7% language barrier, a 14% currency barrier (from the use of different currencies), a 6% information cost barrier, and a 3% security barrier."

On August 31, 2007, Internet broadcaster and conspiracy theorists Hal Turner and Ace Sabau claimed to have arranged for a United States Government minted amero coin to be smuggled out of the U.S. Treasury Department by an employee of that organization. Snopes has assessed both Turner's story and the existence of the amero as "false."

NAFTA superhighway

Main article: NAFTA superhighway
Interstate 29 and Interstate 35.

The Trans-Texas Corridor was first proposed by Texas Governor Rick Perry in 2002. It consists of a 1,200 foot (366 m) wide highway that also carries utilities such as electricity, petroleum, and water, as well as railway track and fiber-optic cables. In July 2007, U.S. Representative and candidate for the Republican nomination in the 2008 presidential election Duncan Hunter successfully offered an amendment to House Resolution 3074, the FY2008 Transportation Appropriations Act, prohibiting the use of federal funds for U.S. Department of Transportation participation in the activities of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP). Hunter stated that:

Unfortunately, very little is known about the NAFTA Super Highway. This amendment will provide Congress the opportunity to exercise oversight of the highway, which remains a subject of question and uncertainty, and ensure that our safety and security will not be compromised in order to promote the business interests of our neighbors.

— 

Fellow Republican Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul brought the issue to mainstream prominence during the December 2007 CNN-YouTube GOP debate, where he rejected the concept and also called it "the NAFTA Superhighway" and, like Hunter, framed it within "the ultimate goal" of creating a North American Union.

The Ministry of Transportation for the province of Alberta displays a diagram on their website that labels I-29 and I-35 as "NAFTA Trade Corridors".

Official statements

In 2001, President of Mexico Vicente Fox said in an interview for Commanding Heights: The Battle for the World Economy that in the long term he sought with the United States a "convergence of our two economies, convergence on the basic and fundamental variables of the economy, convergence on rates of interest, convergence on income of people, convergence on salaries." He suggested this might take as long as 20 years to be realized, but the ultimate "convergence" he saw between the United States and Mexico would allow them to "erase that border, open up that border for free flow of products, merchandises, capital as well as people". After leaving office, he continued to support the concept, while expressing his disappointment with the changed American political situation which made it seem more difficult to come to fruition. In an online discussion of his book Revolution of Hope: The Life, Faith, and Dreams of A Mexican President Fox cited the process of European integration and asked a questioner, "Why can't we be not only partners in the long term, but a North American Union?"

In September 2006, U.S. Representative Virgil Goode proposed with six co-sponsors non-binding House Concurrent Resolution 487, which specifically outlined opposition to a North American Union or a NAFTA Superhighway as a threat to U.S. sovereignty. The bill never left committee. The same resolution was reintroduced by Goode in January 2007 for the 110th Congress as House Concurrent Resolution 40, this time with forty-three cosponsors, including 2008 Republican presidential candidates Duncan Hunter, Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo, who have all expressed opposition to a North American Union during their campaigns.

U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez stated in 2007: "There is no secret plan to create a North American union, or a common currency, or to intrude on the sovereignty of any of the partner nations".

Regarding the NAFTA superhighway, officials from the Federal Highway Administration have denied such a scheme. Also, the NASCO denies a new proposal for a "NAFTA superhighway" saying, "it exists today as I-35."

In an August 2007 press conference in Montebello, Quebec, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper stated that he didn't believe that the NAU was a "generally expressed concern", while U.S. President George W. Bush called concerns of a North American Union "political scare tactics" and described as "comical" the "difference between reality and what some people are talking on TV about."

In popular culture

Literature

Some form of North American Union is a common trope in science fiction literature. Examples include:

  • In the space opera the Lensman series by E.E. Smith, in Volume Two of the series, the 1950 book First Lensman, one of the heroes, Roderick Kinnison (a member of the Galactic Patrol), wins election as President of North America on the "Cosmocratic Party" ticket against the corrupt Witherspoon, who ran on the "Nationalist Party" ticket. North America still uses the electoral college system. The President of North America has a five year term. North America is a republic composed of the former nations of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Its constituent states are the former provinces of Canada, states of the United States, and states of Mexico. (This would make a total of 91 states, assuming the Canadian territories had not yet become states by that time.) The novel takes place several hundred years in the future after Earth has recovered from the late 20th century World War III and has developed interstellar travel using the inertialess drive.
  • Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace takes place in the near future with a common North American currency, and a strong US-led North American confederation.
  • Montezuma Strip and The Mocking Program, both by Alan Dean Foster, take place along the U.S.-Mexican border in a North American Union. The Union police are called Federales.

Television

See also

Trilateral relations of Canada, Mexico, and the United States
North American integration
Enacted Treaties
Official bodies
Active
Defunct
Lobby groups
Theorized projects
Miscellaneous
Global governance and identity
Proposals
Theories
Organisations
Provisional government
World portal
Conspiracy theories
List of conspiracy theories
Overview
Core topics
Psychology
Astronomy and outer space
UFOs
Hoaxes
Deaths and disappearances
Assassination /
suicide theories
Accidents / disasters
Other cases
Body double hoax
Energy, environment
False flag allegations
Gender and sexuality
Health
Race, religion and/or ethnicity
Antisemitic
Christian / Anti-Christian
Islamophobic
Genocide denial /
Denial of mass killings
Regional
Asia
Americas
(outside the United States)
Middle East / North Africa
Russia
Turkey
Other European
United States
2020 election
Other
Pseudolaw
Satirical
See also

References

  1. Building a North American Community - Council on Foreign Relations (PDF)
  2. Pastor, Robert A.; Hills, Carla A.; Jones, James R.; Manley, John P.; Niles, Thomas M.T.; Cunningham, Nelson W.; Weld, William F.; Yzaguirre, Raul H. (2005). Building a North American Community (Task Force Report #53). Council on Foreign Relations Press. ISBN 0876093489. Retrieved 2009-02-07. {{cite book}}: Check |authorlink2= value (help); Check |authorlink3= value (help); Check |authorlink4= value (help); Check |authorlink5= value (help); Check |authorlink6= value (help); Check |authorlink7= value (help); Check |authorlink8= value (help); Check |authorlink= value (help); External link in |authorlink2=, |authorlink3=, |authorlink4=, |authorlink5=, |authorlink6=, |authorlink7=, |authorlink8=, and |authorlink= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-highway30nov30,1,4646522.story
  4. http://www.spp.gov/myths_vs_facts.asp
  5. ^ Dine, Philip (2007-05-19). "Urban legend of "North American Union" feeds on fears". The Seattle Times. Retrieved 2007-07-16.
  6. ^ Braun, Steven (2007-11-30). "Paul believes in threat of North American superhighway". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2007-12-06. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  7. "Diverted by jelly-beans". The Economist. 2007-08-23. Retrieved 2007-12-06.
  8. ^ Kovach, Gretel (2007-12-10). "Highway to Hell?". Newsweek. Retrieved 2007-12-07.
  9. ^ Bennett, Drake (2007-11-25). "The amero conspiracy". International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 2007-12-20.
  10. Bradshaw,, York W. (1996). Global inequalities. Pine Forge Press. ISBN 080399060X. {{cite book}}: External link in |title= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  11. Kibel, Paul Stanton (1999). The earth on trial: environmental law on the international stage. Routledge. ISBN 0415919959. {{cite book}}: External link in |title= (help)
  12. Fetzer, Joel S. (2000). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States, France, and Germany. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521786797. {{cite book}}: External link in |title= (help)
  13. ^ Pastor, Robert (2001). Toward a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New. Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute. p. 115. ISBN 0881323284. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  14. "Open U.S.-Mexican Border". The Brookings Institution. 2000-07-28. Retrieved 2010-4-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  15. "Open Nafta Borders? Why Not?". The Wall Street Journal. 2001-07-02. Retrieved 2010-4-21. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  16. "July Fourth in Post-America". The National Review. 2001-07-03. Retrieved 2010-4-21. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  17. "Death of the West". MSNBC. 2003-10-30. Retrieved 2010-4-19. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  18. Fox, Vicente (2007). Revolution of hope: the life, faith, and dreams of a Mexican president. Viking. ISBN 0670018392. {{cite book}}: External link in |title= (help)
  19. "A New Giant Sucking Sound". AlterNet. 2001-12-18. Retrieved 2010-4-21. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  20. "Perspectives on the United States and Mexico: A Journalists' Forum". University of California, Berkeley. 2003-09-26. Retrieved 2010-4-21. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  21. "The Task Of Today's CCCE: Moving Multilateral Trade Forward". The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel. 2009-10-04. Retrieved 2009-12-01.
  22. "Trinational Call for a North American Economic and Security Community by 2010" (Press release). Council on Foreign Relations. 2005-03-14. Retrieved 2009-12-01.
  23. Joint Statement by President Bush, President Fox, and Prime Minister Martin at www.whitehouse.gov
  24. ^ "SPP Myths vs Facts". Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. Retrieved 2007-12-07.
  25. "The Current Debate Regarding the SPP: Security and the Integration of North America". Center for North American Studies. 2009-12-24. Retrieved 2009-12-24. {{cite web}}: line feed character in |title= at position 38 (help)
  26. ^
  27. 83799$CH2A
  28. "Security & Prosperity Partnership" (PDF). Council of the Americas. 2006-03-15. Retrieved 2010-04-23.
  29. "ENHANCING COMPETITIVENESS IN CANADA, MEXICO, AND THE UNITED STATES" (PDF). North American Competitiveness Council. 2007-02. Retrieved 2010-04-23. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  30. "SPP and the Way Forward for North American Integration" (PDF). Lubin School of Business. 2006-03. Retrieved 2010-04-24. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  31. ^ "Toward a New Frontier Improving the U.S.-Canadian Border" (PDF). The Brookings Institution. 2009-07-13. Retrieved 2010-04-24.
  32. ^ Etzioni, Amitai (2001). Political unification revisited: on building supranational communities. Lexington Books. ISBN 0739102737. {{cite book}}: External link in |title= (help)
  33. ^ Andreas, Peter (2003). The Rebordering of North America: Integration and Exclusion in a New Security Context. Routledge. ISBN 0415944678. {{cite book}}: External link in |title= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthor= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  34. Behind Closed Doors: What they're not telling us about the Security and Prosperity Partnership
  35. http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc110/hc40_ih.xml
  36. http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc109/hc487_ih.xml
  37. "North American Union?". CNN. 2006-06-21. Retrieved 2008-06-25.
  38. A North American United Nations? at www.house.gov
  39. Call for a Referendum on the SPP at www.canadianactionparty.ca
  40. Laura Carlsen (2008-03-03). "The North American Union Farce". Global Research. Retrieved 2009-09-09.
  41. ^ Herbert G. Grubel (1999). "The Case for the Amero: The Economics and Politics of a North American Monetary Union" (PDF). The Fraser Institute. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  42. ^ Herbert G. Grubel (1999). "The Case for the Amero: The Economics and Politics of a North American Monetary Union". The Fraser Institute. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  43. Pastor, Robert. "North America's Second Decade". Foreign Affairs. January/February 2004. Retrieved 2008-02-26.
  44. ^ "NASCO Congressional - Myths vs Facts December 2007" (PDF). North American SuperCorridor Coalition. Retrieved 2007-12-06.
  45. "Canada Should Pursue North American Currency Union" (PDF). C. D. Howe Institute. June 22, 1999. Retrieved 2007-09-25.
  46. Steil, Benn (May/June 2007). "The End of National Currency". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 86, no. 3. Council on Foreign Relations. pp. 83–96. ISSN 0015-7120. Retrieved 2009-02-02. {{cite news}}: Check |author-link= value (help); Check date values in: |publication-date= (help); External link in |author-link= (help)
  47. Anderson, James E.; Van Wincoop, Eric (September 8, 2001). "Borders, Trade and Welfare" (PDF). Brookings Trade Forum. Washington: Brookings Institution Press: 207–244. ISSN 1520-5479. Retrieved 2009-02-02. {{cite journal}}: Check |author-link= value (help); Check |author2-link= value (help); External link in |author-link= and |author2-link= (help)
  48. Anderson, James E.; Van Wincoop, Eric (2004). "Trade Costs" (PDF). Journal of Economic Literature. 42 (3). Nashville: American Economic Association: 691–751. doi:10.1257/0022051042177649. Retrieved 2009-02-02. {{cite journal}}: Check |author-link= value (help); Check |author2-link= value (help); External link in |author-link= and |author2-link= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  49. "Amero Uproar". Snopes.com. Retrieved 2009-06-24.
  50. Congressman Duncan Hunter - Proudly Serving the 52nd District of California : Press Release/Statement
  51. Government of Alberta: NAFTA Trade Corridors & State Truck Standards Accessed 2008-07-16
  52. "Commanding Heights: Vicente Fox". PBS. 2001-04-04. Retrieved 2008-02-26.
  53. Fox, Vicente (guest) Stewart, Jon (host). The Daily Show October 8, 2007. Comedy Central. {{cite AV media}}: External link in |title= (help)
  54. "Book World: Vicente Fox's 'Revolution of Hope'". Washington Post. 2007-11-06. Retrieved 2008-02-26.
  55. "H. Con. Res. 487". Legislation of the 109th United States Congress. GovTrack.us. 2006-09-28. Retrieved 2007-12-27. Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada.
  56. "H. Con. Res. 40". Legislation of the 110th United States Congress. GovTrack.us. 2007-12-09. Retrieved 2007-12-27. Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada.
  57. The Official Site of Duncan Hunter for US President in 2008 | Core Principles
  58. Ron Paul 2008 › Issues › American Independence and Sovereignty
  59. http://teamtancredo.org/stands/
  60. McKenna, Barrie (2007-06-11). "Security and prosperity?". Globe and Mail. Retrieved 2007-12-06. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  61. Remarks to U.S. and Canadian Chambers of Commerce. United States Department of Commerce. 2007-10-30. Retrieved 2007-12-06.
  62. President Bush Participates in Joint Press Availability with Prime Minister Harper of Canada, and President Calderón of Mexico. White House.gov. 2007-08-21. Retrieved 2007-12-06.
  63. Ellik, Ron and Evans, Bill (Illustrations by Bjo Trimble) The Universes of E.E. Smith Chicago:1966 Advent Publishers Page 138
  64. Smith, E.E. First Lensman Reading, Pennsylvania, USA:1950 -- Fantasy Press Chapter 13 "Candidate Kinnison" Pages 182-200 and Chapter 20 "The Election" Pages 292-302

External links

Categories:
North American Union: Difference between revisions Add topic