Revision as of 16:44, 28 April 2010 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 240h) to User talk:Shell Kinney/Archive 14.← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:15, 30 April 2010 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,657 edits →WP:AE#Result concerning Pmanderson: clarification requestNext edit → | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Hi - as explained in that section, I'm unsure whether was made in the exercise of the Arbitration Committee's binding dispute resolution authority. Could you please comment there? Thank you, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:00, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | Hi - as explained in that section, I'm unsure whether was made in the exercise of the Arbitration Committee's binding dispute resolution authority. Could you please comment there? Thank you, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:00, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks for letting me know. I've left a detailed note on the AE thread. ] <sup>]</sup> 01:56, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | :Thanks for letting me know. I've left a detailed note on the AE thread. ] <sup>]</sup> 01:56, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I've . <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 07:15, 30 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Message to All == | == Message to All == |
Revision as of 07:15, 30 April 2010
|
Evidence talk pageI think we need to discuss our Evidence and started this section to allow input from others: . I hope this is fully consistent with the purpose of Discussion page. Thank you for your previous comment.Biophys (talk) 21:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Not sure where/how to address thisI would like to note regarding your comment that EEML dealt only with accusations against members of the list. Evidence which was piled on myself and others by our antagonists, and my and others' evidence pointing to myself/others NOT being the source of WP disruption (rather, my accusers being the source of disruption) was never dealt with. I regret that I see the same pattern of involvement of aligned-by-POV editors and their production of mind-numbing litanies of charges as occurred at EEML. My Photo Uploads=Hi. Thanks for your interest and help. All The photos I've uploaded were either taken by me personally, or belong to my family. I will upload the non-croped photo of Sgt. Hyman "Hank" Bergman which is an original photo. Thanks.Legwarmers1980 (talk) 03:59, 18 April 2010 (UTC)legwarmers1980 Ping
Shell Kinney -- Your comment here in Request for clarification: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 is relevant in the currently open Tang Dynasty thread: You explained that "You're back on the right path - give it some time before immersing yourself in a difficult environment again." Whether viewed from the starting point over a year ago, or construed in the terms of this one "clarification" thread, I have undoubtedly satisfied whatever anyone might mean by "'give it some time' before immersing yourself in a difficult environment again." Arguably, the effort to locate mentors and their comments in this thread was progress along "the right path" and yet, there is no joy in Mudville. Why? What distinguishes this Tang Dynasty thread from "the right path?" If this is not a "the right path", please explain it to those who have volunteered to explain such things to me.
I look forward to your further comments; and I continue to hope for action. --Tenmei (talk) 20:37, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
WP:AE#Result concerning PmandersonHi - as explained in that section, I'm unsure whether your extension of Pmanderson's topic ban was made in the exercise of the Arbitration Committee's binding dispute resolution authority. Could you please comment there? Thank you, Sandstein 17:00, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Message to AllA great problem solver and a wonderful person. Edwin Black Washington DC (talk) 16:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC) |