| Revision as of 18:01, 31 May 2010 editLilv4t098 (talk | contribs)790 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:04, 31 May 2010 edit undoAnthony Bradbury (talk | contribs)25,053 edits decline unblockNext edit → | ||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=Your reason here, okay well I hope the other person on that same page, who kept reverting it was also blocked too. I dont see in the first place why my articles were "getting" changed. Let's say if your were editing an article, and it was legit, but somebody kept changing it, what would you do?|decline=No reason given for unblock. And your question has already been answered. --<font color="Red">]</font><sup><font color="Black">]</font></sup> 20:43, 30 May 2010 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|1=Your reason here, okay well I hope the other person on that same page, who kept reverting it was also blocked too. I dont see in the first place why my articles were "getting" changed. Let's say if your were editing an article, and it was legit, but somebody kept changing it, what would you do?|decline=No reason given for unblock. And your question has already been answered. --<font color="Red">]</font><sup><font color="Black">]</font></sup> 20:43, 30 May 2010 (UTC)}} | ||
| {{unblock|your reason here; haha okay ass hole im already using a different account on a different IP adress, and you'll never fuckin know what it is!! have a good life stupid ass!! :) }} | {{unblock reviewed|1=your reason here; haha okay ass hole im already using a different account on a different IP adress, and you'll never fuckin know what it is!! have a good life stupid ass!! :) |decline=No reason given to unblock. If you edit responsibly on your new account then we will all be happy. If not then we will take whatever action appears appropriate. --<font color="Red">]</font><sup><font color="Black">]</font></sup> 18:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)}} | ||
Revision as of 18:04, 31 May 2010
January 2010
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Revolver (T-Pain album), please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 02:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of All I Do Is Win
An article that you have been involved in editing, All I Do Is Win, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/All I Do Is Win. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Yappy2bhere (talk) 02:39, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 00:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of RevolveR
Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Yappy2bhere (talk) 16:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of I Am Carlos
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is I Am Carlos. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/I Am Carlos. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
RevolveR
Just stop it. Can be created once the time is ripe. Otherwise you'll be blcoked.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of RevolveЯ
A tag has been placed on RevolveЯ, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. tetraedycal, tetraedycal 19:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
February 2010
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 20:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|The single Reverse Cowgirl has been confirmed by [[T-Pain[[, so stop reverting it!! why should i get blocked?}}
Sockpuppetry case
|
Your name has been in mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lilv4t098 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Goodvac (talk) 06:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit that you made to the page Reverse Cowgirl has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Ronhjones 00:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Thank Me Later. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Blocked 1 week
You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.
{{67.173.135.8|Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Lilv4t098". The reason given for Lilv4t098's block is: "because he was editing what has been confirmed: And f|MuZemike|1813102}}
- You are not autoblocked, you have been blocked directly for the reasons clearly explained in the block notice at the top of this section. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Extended to 1 month
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
I have reset your block again and have blocked the IP you were using for 6 months. Evade your block again, and the next one will be indefinite. –MuZemike 23:28, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Lilv4t098 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Okay so I was blockled several times. But I didn't know I was doing something wrong! First it was because of "sockpuppetry" or something. which i have no idea what that is! Please explain to me.. And second time for abusing "multiple accounts" I only have 1 account and that is this one. I Think september is too long to wait. Can you do something about it!?
Decline reason:
Yes, but you logged out of this account, and edited anonymously in an attempt to avoid this block. If you did not wish to be blocked until september, you would have behaved differently some time ago. This did not happen overnight, there is a history here, and you were given ample opportunity to alter your behavior. Jayron32 02:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lilv4t098 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Alright i see what i did wrong, so "sockpuppet" is when someone keeps adding information after its been removed continuously? I was wondering why my info kept getting deleated! can I get one more chance since i now know what i'm doing wrong!? btw i just recently started editing on here, i have two other people on the IP adress using it to, except im not sure if they edit or just go to the website fo information. anyways please understand and make an exception for me, and i promise i wont make the same mistake! please and thanks!!
Decline reason:
It isn't at all clear that you understand how to write an appropriate article, or that you understand that you aren't allowed to edit when you are blocked; it is clear that you haven't yet read very many of Misplaced Pages's policies. Therefore, it isn't a good time to unblock this account, since you're likely to simply break the same rules again. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- No, "edit-warring" is the re-addition of information (whether "right" or not) after it has been rightfully reverted by someone else. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle. "sockpuppetry is editing the same article either using more than one account, or a combination of account and anonymously via an IP address.
- It appears that you actually did both: edit-war, and edit as a sock. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Candyo32 (talk) 19:29, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.Candyo32 (talk) 19:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Candyo32 (talk) 19:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Everbody Else
The article Everbody Else has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable song, fails WP:MUSIC.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Karppinen (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Undoing article cleanup, undoing redirects, recreating articles
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - eo (talk) 00:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Lilv4t098 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here; why did you block me? The page I was trying to fix up kept getting reverted back. The reason was because the "US Pop" charts has been discontinured, but it is now considered "top mainstream" and that is a currently exsisting chart. Unblock me.
Decline reason:
We've been through this before: re-read WP:BRD. If your edit gets reverted, it's up to YOU to obtain new WP:CONSENSUS before re-adding it. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:00, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lilv4t098 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here, okay well I hope the other person on that same page, who kept reverting it was also blocked too. I dont see in the first place why my articles were "getting" changed. Let's say if your were editing an article, and it was legit, but somebody kept changing it, what would you do?
Decline reason:
No reason given for unblock. And your question has already been answered. --Anthony.bradbury 20:43, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lilv4t098 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
your reason here; haha okay ass hole im already using a different account on a different IP adress, and you'll never fuckin know what it is!! have a good life stupid ass!! :)
Decline reason:
No reason given to unblock. If you edit responsibly on your new account then we will all be happy. If not then we will take whatever action appears appropriate. --Anthony.bradbury 18:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.