Revision as of 23:39, 20 January 2006 editKittybrewster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,052 edits →Proper designation for Baronets?← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:58, 26 January 2006 edit undoPerfecto (talk | contribs)4,584 edits {{spam}}Next edit → | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Hello, Kittybrewster. I'm ], a ] that helps new members contribute to Misplaced Pages. You might like to edit these ] based on things you've edited in the past. Check it out -- I hope you find it useful. -- ] 14:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | Hello, Kittybrewster. I'm ], a ] that helps new members contribute to Misplaced Pages. You might like to edit these ] based on things you've edited in the past. Check it out -- I hope you find it useful. -- ] 14:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Kittybrewster == | |||
Please do not add commercial links — ''or links to your own private websites'' — to Misplaced Pages. ] a vehicle for ] or a mere collection of ]. See the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. <!-- {{spam}} --> ] ] 01:58, 26 January 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:58, 26 January 2006
Welcome!
Hi Kittybrewster! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Herostratus 04:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Alexander Dundas Young Arbuthnott
Hi. In the article on Alexander Dundas Young Arbuthnott, the birth and death dates in the article are different than those in the Categories. Also, events in the article indicate a lifespan from the very early 19th century (or earlier) to at least 1942. Perhaps you have conflated two persons? More details on article's talk page. Thanks! Herostratus 04:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, OK, got it. The later dates and some of the honors properly belonged to Geoffrey Schomberg Arbuthnot. Fixed that. Some other questions remain about A.D.Y. Arbuthnot, listed on the talk page. Herostratus 17:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Re: Dalrymple Arbuthnot
Oh, and let me congratulate you on the Arbuthnot family series! Didn't mean to just jump in with questions. But I do have some on Dalrymple Arbuthnot such that I felt I had to put a verify tag on the article. The questions are on the article's talk (discussion) page, looking forward to working with you on clearing up these questions. Herostratus 21:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Proper designation for Baronets?
I'm given to understand that the usual designation in the UK (and the Commonwealth, I suppose) for Baronets is:
- Sir Arbuthnot, Bt
However, for the edification of our American readers (of which I am one), I would like to spell out the title, as shown below. I assume that this is OK since it is just enlarging an abbreviation, right? Like this:
- Sir Arbuthnot, Baronet
But, I would to be even more specific. I guess that Baronets don't have a geographic designation as part of their name? Which seems very confusing to me. So, are any of these designations proper?:
- Sir Arbuthnot, Baronet of Edinburgh
- Sir Arbuthnot, nth Baronet of Edinburgh
- Sir Arbuthnot, Baronet Arbuthnot of Edinburgh
- Sir Arbuthnot, nth Baronet Arbuthnot of Edinbburgh
Or is there another convention that can be used to differentiate (say) a Baronet of Edinburgh from a Baronet of Kittybrewster? Get back to me when you can! Thanks! Herostratus 17:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
All Baronetcies have a territorial designation (as do all peerages except, I think, Royal ones). So the correct description would be
- Sir Arbuthnot, 2nd Baronet of Edinburgh
and/or * Sir Arbuthnot of Edinburgh, 2nd Baronet User:Kittybrewster 23:32, 20 January 2006
Ludlow or Edinburgh?
In the article Baronet Arbuthnot of Edinburgh, it speaks of the "Arbuthnot Baronetcy of Edinburgh", but the article Arbuthnot Baronets, it uses the name "Arbuthnot Baronetcy of Ludlow", to speak of what clearly is the same title. Is one wrong, or are they interchangable, or what? Herostratus 17:56, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Arbuthnot of Ludlow is an error. Arbuthnot of Edinburgh is correct. User:Kittybrewster
Looking for articles to work on?
Hello, Kittybrewster. I'm SuggestBot, a Misplaced Pages bot that helps new members contribute to Misplaced Pages. You might like to edit these articles I picked for you based on things you've edited in the past. Check it out -- I hope you find it useful. -- SuggestBot 14:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Kittybrewster
Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Misplaced Pages. Misplaced Pages is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Perfecto Canada 01:58, 26 January 2006 (UTC)