Revision as of 18:59, 24 June 2010 editJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 edits →Jack Lord#Filmography: +reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:16, 24 June 2010 edit undoChowbok (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,090 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:::::{{ec}} Jack Merridew, a neutral message: "This user previously edited as Davenbelle ()" would do, no? Oh, the RfC is only on colour, and nowt else? Would be good to get sortability and rowspan resolved too. Wildhartlivie: your concern about Jack Merridew apparently following you is noted and I am inclined to agree that he needs to stop interacting with you (and probably ''vice versa''). I'll read all this again, and see if I have any intelligent comments to make. ]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&</span>] 18:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC) | :::::{{ec}} Jack Merridew, a neutral message: "This user previously edited as Davenbelle ()" would do, no? Oh, the RfC is only on colour, and nowt else? Would be good to get sortability and rowspan resolved too. Wildhartlivie: your concern about Jack Merridew apparently following you is noted and I am inclined to agree that he needs to stop interacting with you (and probably ''vice versa''). I'll read all this again, and see if I have any intelligent comments to make. ]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&</span>] 18:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::::: briefly, I see her as attempting to run me off from 'her' articles because she does not want anyone with differing views editing her articles; see my interactions with Rossrs, who's adopted a lot of what I'm advocating. Cheers, ] 18:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC) | ::::::: briefly, I see her as attempting to run me off from 'her' articles because she does not want anyone with differing views editing her articles; see my interactions with Rossrs, who's adopted a lot of what I'm advocating. Cheers, ] 18:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::I see WHL's constant references to her poor health rather manipulative, not to mention irrelevant. Either editors' actions are within policy or they aren't. What another editor's health has to do with escapes me. If WHL's health is endangered by Misplaced Pages, then WHL should stop editing on Misplaced Pages, not try to get every other editor to change their behavior. —] ] 19:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Facepalm?== | ==Facepalm?== |
Revision as of 19:16, 24 June 2010
Misplaced Pages ads | file info – #198 |
Jack Lord#Filmography
Hi. Care to review this? There are threads related to it on the article talk page, User talk:Viriditas, User talk:Maile66, and User talk:Wildhartlivie. Cheers, Jack Merridew 18:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Looks OK and the sorting works, and the previous table was a mess. Why are you asking me, and why are you monitoring Wildhartlivie's editing? And re: their comments about you being a sock: "I told you so." Stop going on about it and "ArbCom commending you". Fences&Windows 18:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- My issue is that she's continuing to call her preferred approach the "standard". She's advocating the removal of the sorting, and it was Maile66 and Wildhartlivie who brought up my history, not I. I noticed this because the Jack Lord article perked-up on my watchlist. And I pinged you because you're reasonably familiar with this.
- I'm about to go out; will check-back laters. Cheers, Jack Merridew 18:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- You brought up your history with your "This user is a sockpuppet" notice. Everyone who looks at your userpage sees it. Wasn't there supposed to be an RfC on this? Fences&Windows 18:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- I trimmed the sock aspects of my user page back some months ago. I do see at as a part of my history and about transparency. There is a stub of a colour RfC at User talk:Moonriddengirl/RfC and I need to get focused on that. Cheers, Jack Merridew 18:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- The simple fact is that Jack shows up at many articles where he has never edited before, just as he did the Jack Lord one for the first time, less than an hour after I posted my reassessment comments at the article talk page. This goes on constantly and it's a real issue. His conduct regarding me tremendously inhibits my enjoyment of the site and is factually wikistalking. That Jack wants to change the standard to his preferred version does not take away from the fact that the use of that template had consensus at the first RfC on WT:ACTOR and he tends to fill his time with appearing at various articles soon after I edit there to "police" me or simply to announce that his eyes are on me. Whether he has 5000, 8000 or 100,000 articles on his watchlist where he has never previously edited, he invariably shows up at articles within a short time of my editing them. This needs to stop, really. Please. He's also well aware that this conduct is incredibly stressful to me and that my health is effected by it. Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:44, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Jack Merridew, a neutral message: "This user previously edited as Davenbelle ()" would do, no? Oh, the RfC is only on colour, and nowt else? Would be good to get sortability and rowspan resolved too. Wildhartlivie: your concern about Jack Merridew apparently following you is noted and I am inclined to agree that he needs to stop interacting with you (and probably vice versa). I'll read all this again, and see if I have any intelligent comments to make. Fences&Windows 18:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- briefly, I see her as attempting to run me off from 'her' articles because she does not want anyone with differing views editing her articles; see my interactions with Rossrs, who's adopted a lot of what I'm advocating. Cheers, Jack Merridew 18:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- I see WHL's constant references to her poor health rather manipulative, not to mention irrelevant. Either editors' actions are within policy or they aren't. What another editor's health has to do with escapes me. If WHL's health is endangered by Misplaced Pages, then WHL should stop editing on Misplaced Pages, not try to get every other editor to change their behavior. —Chowbok ☠ 19:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Jack Merridew, a neutral message: "This user previously edited as Davenbelle ()" would do, no? Oh, the RfC is only on colour, and nowt else? Would be good to get sortability and rowspan resolved too. Wildhartlivie: your concern about Jack Merridew apparently following you is noted and I am inclined to agree that he needs to stop interacting with you (and probably vice versa). I'll read all this again, and see if I have any intelligent comments to make. Fences&Windows 18:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Facepalm?
You might want to change need to needed? O Fenian (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Um. Yeah. Ironic, eh? Fences&Windows 18:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Certainly an inopportune moment to do that yes. O Fenian (talk) 18:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)