| Revision as of 10:23, 5 July 2010 editEdgeNavidad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,523 edits →About billions and millions: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:29, 5 July 2010 edit undoToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,765 edits →Civility Warning: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| In my edit on ], I was thinking of ]. I was not aware of the guideline ] that you gave, that the short scale should be used, so your revert was justified (although not strictly necessary, because my edit still followed WP:ORDINAL). But in your edit summary, you mentioned an "accusation". I don't know who you think I was accusing of what, I was just trying to improve the article. --] (]) 10:23, 5 July 2010 (UTC) | In my edit on ], I was thinking of ]. I was not aware of the guideline ] that you gave, that the short scale should be used, so your revert was justified (although not strictly necessary, because my edit still followed WP:ORDINAL). But in your edit summary, you mentioned an "accusation". I don't know who you think I was accusing of what, I was just trying to improve the article. --] (]) 10:23, 5 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Civility Warning == | |||
| Your comment on ] was far from ] and rather unconstructive. You may be blocked if this continues. ] <small>(])</small> 18:29, 5 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:29, 5 July 2010
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
| Archives
|
| Archive 1 2007-01-30 |
| Archive 2 2010-03-31 |
| Archive 3 2010-06-28 |
Plural wikilinks
Thanks for the note regarding the proper way to link plurals in wikilinks, as indicated on the edit history of Stryper. I appreciate the heads up. Every little bit helps. ;) Cindamuse (talk) 04:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
??
Hi there WALTER, VASCO from Portugal here,
Really did not understand your reaction at this discussion (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#User:Zombie433). The last sub-section which i added, was clearly of no use to the discussion, it was just written out of frustration, i admit it but:
1 - User:Zombie433's English is appalling, as other users have attested to (using this same word), as appalling as my German would be if i attempted to write coherent stuff in articles, so i don't edit in that WP. Also, his level of (lack of) cooperation is beyond this world, hence my frustration most of the times (his lack of cooperation is also addressed to in the discussion, nothing i am making up).
2 - You immediately jumped to his defense, with the counter-effect of attacking me (since you said "compared to the current structure, Zombie's edit is not bad", then emphasized some words, i assume the words in black are my errors, failed to see at least ONE therein). On a related note, why do you took ofense to the word "sold"? Yes, i am fully aware that slavery has ended, but players are sold to teams for an amount of money or, in american sports, exchanged for other players (the PLAYER is sold, not the HUMAN BEING). The Major League Soccer reference really got me confused, maybe you could explain it to me...
Really, Walter, i would really appreciate some feedback, so that no bad stuff remains unsolved, and that we can have a good wiki-relationship, as i want with all the (well-intended) users.
Again, i apologize for any incovenience (even tough you are not directly involved in the situation which resulted in this), keep up the good work - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 23:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Convinced of? I will gladly explain and/or clarify any doubts that you may have, just ask - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 00:10, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Another editor which does not wish to converse with me, even when i apologize and act friendly...You said you were not convinced of something, i offer to clear out any doubts you might have - as i also have - also asking what did you mean by that MLS reference, really did not understand it, and zero response? OK (yes i see by your edits you have been busy with stuff from the 2010 FIFA World Cup, but i still three or four minutes to send some minor feedback would be not be a great deal in your "wiki-schedule").
OK, rest assured, will not bother you anymore, happy life and editing, keep up the good work - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:55, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- I responded on your talk page. I'm not convinced that this user needs to be monitored. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes Walter, i had already read that reply, thank you for that. Now, i understand what do you mean by "i am not convinced". Take care - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 00:08, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Fifa World Cup Squads
Hey Walter - are you certain of that? I've shifted the edit to the section later so at least it has less prominence... Gavinio (talk) 01:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
2010 FIFA World Cup knockout stage
The FIFA.com result is from the views of fans who simply vote for Honda because he is the most popular player from either squad. This page has expert views, but I am sorry for putting Morel's name, I meant to put Lucas Barrios as MoM. M-R-Schumacher (talk) 16:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
Wow, that was a very pleasant surprise... thanks very much, glad you found it useful! Just hope that other editors agree that it's an improvement, as some are quite fond of wiki-syntax window-dressing. Time will tell, I guess. Knepflerle (talk) 19:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Minister-Präsident
Does Minister-Präsident mean Minister-President and Erste Minister mean Prime Minister or First Minister? Kingjeff (talk) 02:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
So, the head of a German state in english would be Minister-President? Kingjeff (talk) 02:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Still waiting...
"So now we are to believe that you are addressing me in the first sentence, and then refer to John as "you" in the next sentence. Be honest, admit you have been caught out..." Still wiaing: you've made about 40 other edits since, and you haven't usually been slow to respond. Kevin McE (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- You are happy then to be seen as an editor who makes false accusations, lies about it, and then refuses to acknowledge it or apologise when caught out? Kevin McE (talk) 07:45, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- It really is no more than a matter of simple adult responsibility ... Kevin McE (talk) 06:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Re: FC Bayern Munich
Some time ago i used a similare squad list on Halmstads BK and it was changed by another user back to the original, i took it up on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Football, where several other agreed on that the original was the better choice and i went along with the major opinion. If their is a new consensus that it will/should be used i would not mind using that style of squad list. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 18:50, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Contemporary worship music
Are you aware of this discussion?--Bhuck (talk) 14:22, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- No because I don't follow the German wikiepdia discussions. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- When making Interwiki-Links to the German Misplaced Pages, it would be helpful if you would follow the German Misplaced Pages discussions.--Bhuck (talk) 06:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
About billions and millions
In my edit on 2010 FIFA World Cup, I was thinking of WP:ENGVAR. I was not aware of the guideline WP:ORDINAL that you gave, that the short scale should be used, so your revert was justified (although not strictly necessary, because my edit still followed WP:ORDINAL). But in your edit summary, you mentioned an "accusation". I don't know who you think I was accusing of what, I was just trying to improve the article. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 10:23, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Civility Warning
Your comment on User talk:PeeJay2K3 was far from WP:CIVIL and rather unconstructive. You may be blocked if this continues. Toddst1 (talk) 18:29, 5 July 2010 (UTC)