Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:11, 16 August 2010

I do tend to delete messages when they are no longer relevant, so don't take offence if/when your message goes the way of the dodo

Animal attacks

I would suggest that edit warring with regard to the content of these articles on your part is irresponsible - several other articles of the same type by the same user with the same basic problems were deleted at AfD by the user (several more than once, as the user tried a few times to sneakily recreate the articles, and got blocked for it ultimately). There were also noticeboard discussions supporting the conclusion the AfDs reached, and AN/Is involving neutral, non-Australian admins agreeing that James's behaviour was disruptive. Misplaced Pages is not a bureaucracy, and I think Caesia's actions in redirecting were entirely reasonable given that existing gauging of consensus. If it is so much of a problem I will nominate the five articles for deletion in their own right, but I'm disappointed that you think it's acceptable or even appropriate to re-add hysterical, unsupportable OR to the encyclopaedia without any sense of responsibility. Orderinchaos 21:59, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Before you get too stressed about this, I have no idea about the previous history of these articles, all I saw was a single purpose account that seems to have been created solely to redirect these articles - http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Caesia . I have no idea who James is and was certainly not going to check through the entire history of Misplaced Pages, on the chance that there was an ANI report in the past. I assume you have had previous history with these articles, but I have not and it might be nice if you assumed good faith regarding my edits and modified your tone a little. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! 또라이 (talk) 16:28, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I was responding to a noticeboard post by someone who had noticed the reversion on one article, and when I followed up, discovered the other four - after your reversion of my first one, I concluded you had been canvassed by the banned SPA to do the reversions (this does happen - I get approaches from such users by email or talk page sometimes). Obviously this was an erroneous assumption on my part, and I apologise for that. Orderinchaos 13:17, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate the reply. I don't respond to users canvassing me, I get in enough trouble on my own, without letting other editors make trouble for me. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! 또라이 (talk) 15:04, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Check this out

Since you are interested in Korea-related topics (nationalism related topics) too, and this "article" also talks about Japan and Korea. The article was created few days ago and was recently nominated for deletion at here Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pure blood theory in Korea, It would be nice if you can join the discussion since we need different opinions from different perspective. --LLTimes (talk) 07:04, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, after looking at the article and the validity of the sources, I suggested that the article was kept. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! 또라이 (talk) 15:30, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

About your signature

Can you erase "또라이" from your signature, please? It is very offensive, bad word. I don't want to see that word here. - Chugun (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

I don't think it is that offensive. I like having a bit of Japanese and a bit of Korean in my signature, it looks kinda cool. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! 또라이 (talk) 16:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)