Misplaced Pages

User talk:Badanagram: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:59, 22 February 2010 editBadanagram (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users596 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:53, 2 October 2010 edit undoToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,765 edits NPA and sockpuppetry - only warning: new sectionNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
Now, the article does need work so if you do have interest in this subject I encourage you to add more content to it. I have added a tag myself requesting that it be expanded which might help the article get attention. But I just wanted to leave you a message, letting you know not to give up on articles you want to see created, there are other editors who will support you if your article has merit. -- ''']]''' 18:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Now, the article does need work so if you do have interest in this subject I encourage you to add more content to it. I have added a tag myself requesting that it be expanded which might help the article get attention. But I just wanted to leave you a message, letting you know not to give up on articles you want to see created, there are other editors who will support you if your article has merit. -- ''']]''' 18:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks, I will have a go, but this person is quite enigmatic! To create a suitable article will take a lot of research and learning more about proper[REDACTED] editing. :Thanks, I will have a go, but this person is quite enigmatic! To create a suitable article will take a lot of research and learning more about proper[REDACTED] editing.

== NPA and sockpuppetry - only warning ==

{{{icon|] }}}This is the '''only warning''' you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

It's clear you know that ] will get you blocked, hence you logged out to make your comments, thinking your IP wouldn't give your identity away. No worries, you've left plenty of evidence of your actions and your cowardice, but logging out to make your attacks will get you blocked as well. This is your only warning. ] <small>(])</small> 17:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:53, 2 October 2010


Lucy Mangan

Hello Pigeonshouse, I am a Proposed Deletion Patroller and I noticed that the proposed deletion of Lucy Mangan was about to expire. The article was going to be deleted because she is not "notable" enough, however it's clear that she is regularly published in a major newspaper so I deleted the proposal. Just to let you know, according to the policy regarding proposed deletions, they can only be deleted if the deletion is non-controversial. That means that if someone wants to delete an article, and you don't think it should be deleted, it is automatically ineligible. All you have to do is edit the article, delete the tag that was added, and you should explain in the edit summary why you don't want it deleted. If you do this, any further attempts to delete the article are deemed controversial because someone (you) object to it, and the only way to delete it is through a formal process where you can defend the article's value.

Now, the article does need work so if you do have interest in this subject I encourage you to add more content to it. I have added a tag myself requesting that it be expanded which might help the article get attention. But I just wanted to leave you a message, letting you know not to give up on articles you want to see created, there are other editors who will support you if your article has merit. -- Atama 18:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I will have a go, but this person is quite enigmatic! To create a suitable article will take a lot of research and learning more about proper[REDACTED] editing.

NPA and sockpuppetry - only warning

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

It's clear you know that WP:NPA will get you blocked, hence you logged out to make your comments, thinking your IP wouldn't give your identity away. No worries, you've left plenty of evidence of your actions and your cowardice, but logging out to make your attacks will get you blocked as well. This is your only warning. Toddst1 (talk) 17:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Badanagram: Difference between revisions Add topic